Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.5.0 RC1

The maven wagon issue looks like https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9170 which doesn’t seem to affect everybody. SystemCollectionCompatTest failures are already tracked in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14128

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.5.0 RC1

I you installed python3 through homebrew it can be that SSL root certificates are not updated. There seems to be a few workarounds here https://stackoverflow.com/questions/44649449/brew-installation-of-python-3-6-1-ssl-certificate-verify-failed-certificate Or simply download and install python3

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.5.0 RC1

smoke tester failed for me with "SSL: CERTIFICATE_VERIFY_FAILED" although curl is able to retrieve the dist.apache.org URL. Possibly there is some problem with my Python's CA bundle, but if so I'm not sure how to resolve at the moment. I checked out the 8.5 branch and ran "ant nightly-smoke"

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.5.0 RC1

+1 Tested with Java 8. Smoke tester also did not work for me, as random unit tests would fail each time. Looked into each, and none looked like blockers. Manually ran the tests as well and got one failure that passed when running individually. On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 3:08 AM jim ferenczi

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.5.0 RC1

+1 SUCCESS! [1:18:55.683704] Le mar. 17 mars 2020 à 01:35, Mike Drob a écrit : > +1 (non-binding) > > All testing was with Java 11.0.5 > > Smoke tester didn't work (expected) > > Manually ran lucene and solr tests, had a few solr failures but they > passed when rerunning individually. > Went

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.5.0 RC1

+1 (non-binding) All testing was with Java 11.0.5 Smoke tester didn't work (expected) Manually ran lucene and solr tests, had a few solr failures but they passed when rerunning individually. Went through the tutorial, have a few minor updates to make that I'll take care of in the next few days

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.5.0 RC1

+1 SUCCESS! [1:20:34.327672] On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 12:59 PM Kevin Risden wrote: > +1 > > SUCCESS! [1:24:43.574849] > > Kevin Risden > > On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 3:40 PM Nhat Nguyen > wrote: > > > > +1 > > > > SUCCESS! [0:52:39.991003] > > > > On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 11:14 AM Cassandra

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.5.0 RC1

+1 SUCCESS! [1:24:43.574849] Kevin Risden On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 3:40 PM Nhat Nguyen wrote: > > +1 > > SUCCESS! [0:52:39.991003] > > On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 11:14 AM Cassandra Targett > wrote: >> >> I pushed the Solr Ref Guide DRAFT up this morning (thought I did it on >> Friday, sorry):

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.5.0 RC1

+1 SUCCESS! [0:52:39.991003] On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 11:14 AM Cassandra Targett wrote: > I pushed the Solr Ref Guide DRAFT up this morning (thought I did it on > Friday, sorry): https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/8_5/. > > Cassandra > On Mar 15, 2020, 6:06 PM -0500, Uwe Schindler , wrote: >

RE: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.5.0 RC1

I pushed the Solr Ref Guide DRAFT up this morning (thought I did it on Friday, sorry): https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/8_5/. Cassandra On Mar 15, 2020, 6:06 PM -0500, Uwe Schindler , wrote: > Hi, > > I instructed Policeman Jenkins to automatically test the release for me, the > result

RE: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.5.0 RC1

Hi, I instructed Policeman Jenkins to automatically test the release for me, the result (Java 8 / Java 9 combined Smoketesting): SUCCESS! [1:24:47.422173] (see https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-Release-Tester/30/console) I also downloaded the artifacts and tested manually: - Solr

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.5.0 RC1

+1 SUCCESS! [1:04:09.647360] Jan > 13. mar. 2020 kl. 15:26 skrev Alan Woodward : > > Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene/Solr 8.5.0 > > The artifacts can be downloaded from: >

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.5.0 RC1

Hi, +1 (non-binding) SUCCESS! [1:32:51.320515] Andras On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 3:31 PM Alan Woodward wrote: > Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene/Solr 8.5.0 > > The artifacts can be downloaded from: > >