Before we start, I almost forgot, we need to make sure that it can actually
be ported into the project, according to ASF guidelines. I *think* it
should be okay, because it's licensed under the Apache 2.0 license, but we
should get some feedback from our mentors, on whether this is okay.
Stefan,
Thanks for your reply.
> Aside from the original port which had many divergences from java, the
> only other issue applied to spatial is LUCENENET-431, which would be easy
> to include.
>
>
That is not correct. LUCENENET-431 was committed, but some fixed from Java
Lucene 3.0.3 are in as well. Th
> > >
> > > I'm having trouble finding chained filter in the java lucene svn...
> > >
> >
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/lucene/dev/branches/branch_3x/lucene/contrib/?pathrev=990167amIlooking
> around in the wrong place?
> > > > Date:
the wrong place?
> > > Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 11:19:51 +0300
> > > Subject: Re: Spatial contrib bug fixing
> > > From: ita...@code972.com
> > > To: lucene-net-...@lucene.apache.org
> > >
> > > One more thing - what's the deal with ChainedFil
I'm having trouble finding chained filter in the java lucene svn...
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/lucene/dev/branches/branch_3x/lucene/contrib/?pathrev=990167
am I looking around in the wrong place?
> Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 11:19:51 +0300
> Subject: Re: Spatial contrib bug fixing
When 3.0.3 was ported, there were lots of changes and so we have to work with
re-porting all the contrib packages. (I think..)
> Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 11:19:51 +0300
> Subject: Re: Spatial contrib bug fixing
> From: ita...@code972.com
> To: lucene-net-...@lucene.apache.org
>
&
