Re: Solr RefGuide Errata page wrong link

Do we have Google analytics stats for how often the Errata page in the online refGuide is visited? Eh, since the link from PDF is broken that number may be 0 :-) I agree that most people may be unaware of that page, and perhaps the page is not needed since we tend to release new minor versions

Re: Solr RefGuide Errata page wrong link

The Errata page isn't the place for "We released 7.3 and then found a bug" IMO. There would be hundreds of candidates for that. SOLR-12321 isn't an issue that we missed documenting - it was a bug that was not discovered until later. But you missed my point - if people have had ideas for how to use

Re: Solr RefGuide Errata page wrong link

One candidate for an errata entry could be https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12321 do document that 7.3 broke back compat with 7.2. This should normally have been documented in CHANGES Upgrade Notes. Perhaps there should be a link to

Re: Solr RefGuide Errata page wrong link

Yeah, you're right - it's parameterized using a bad parameter. I've often thought, though, that it should go away - we never update it and having a page that refers to itself online is weird. Thoughts? Anyone really want this page and intend to update it? I likely won't ever unless I get a ton of e

Solr RefGuide Errata page wrong link

See https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/7_3/errata.html The link on that page says /7.3/… but should be /7_3/… so it is a 404 now, and probably also in the PDF. PS: The Apache Comments section is not active -- Jan Høydahl, search solution architect Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com ---