ent between tests (and test
> iterations)
> -
>
> Key: LUCENE-5916
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5916
> Project: Lucene - Core
>
5916:
-
Commit 1621892 from [~erickoerickson] in branch 'dev/branches/branch_4x'
[ https://svn.apache.org/r1621892 ]
LUCENE-5916: Static scope test components should be consistent between tests
(and test iterations)
> Static scope test components should be consistent between tests (and t
ope test components should be consistent between tests (and test
> iterations)
> -
>
> Key: LUCENE-5916
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5916
>
5916:
-
Commit 1621889 from [~erickoerickson] in branch 'dev/trunk'
[ https://svn.apache.org/r1621889 ]
LUCENE-5916: Static scope test components should be consistent between tests
(and test iterations)
> Static scope test components should be consistent between tests (and t
nts should be consistent between tests (and test
> iterations)
> -
>
> Key: LUCENE-5916
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5916
> P
Dawid Weiss created LUCENE-5916:
---
Summary: Static scope test components should be consistent between
tests (and test iterations)
Key: LUCENE-5916
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5916
8 PM
> To: dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Test iterations
>
> Slightly improved patch:
> forbidding tests.iters is not needed. It still makes sense to beast 20 rounds
> and each test repeated (with same static class seed) 20 times, too -> 400
> reps. Also more groovy-like
.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> -Original Message-
> From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:u...@thetaphi.de]
> Sent: Saturday, August 09, 2014 8:08 PM
> To: dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Test iterations
>
> Hi,
>
> attached you will find the beaster:
>
> - O
hi.de]
> Sent: Friday, August 08, 2014 8:13 PM
> To: dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Test iterations
>
> Hi,
>
> I will look into that as a Groovy Skript: The main problem is: You cannot
> simply
> use in a loop, because this would also execute the dependenci
Mail: u...@thetaphi.de
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Ryan Ernst [mailto:r...@iernst.net]
>> Sent: Friday, August 08, 2014 5:08 PM
>> To: dev@lucene.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Test iterations
>>
>> Thanks for the extremely thorough ans
, 2014 5:08 PM
> To: dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Test iterations
>
> Thanks for the extremely thorough answer, Dawid! Entertaining as always. :)
>
> > Should we provide this "beaster" in common-build?
>
> I would use it! It sounds like there is
ers -
>> and comes embedded...
>>
>> Uwe
>>
>> -
>> Uwe Schindler
>> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
>> http://www.thetaphi.de
>> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
>>
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> Fro
akes it easier to use for the python haters - and
> comes embedded...
>
> Uwe
>
> -
> Uwe Schindler
> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
> http://www.thetaphi.de
> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Michael McCandless [mailto
Original Message-
> From: Michael McCandless [mailto:luc...@mikemccandless.com]
> Sent: Friday, August 08, 2014 3:48 PM
> To: Lucene/Solr dev
> Subject: Re: Test iterations
>
> On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 9:35 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
> > Hi Dawid,
> >
> > Thanks for
On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 9:35 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
> Hi Dawid,
>
> Thanks for the very good explanation! Indeed the main problem with
> tests.iters is the static initializers. Maybe put that explanation into the
> Wiki! I sometimes also need to remember it, so it should be documented.
>
> One
@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Test iterations
>
> Hi Ryan,
>
> So. I discussed this a while ago, but here it comes again. Let me first clear
> a
> few things from what you said.
>
> > Only in the last month or so did I learn that -Dtests.iters doesn't really
Hi Ryan,
So. I discussed this a while ago, but here it comes again. Let me
first clear a few things from what you said.
> Only in the last month or so did I learn that -Dtests.iters doesn't really
> "work". What I mean is in regards to randomization.
This is not true. It works (as I will expla
It is a longer story, Ryan. And *not* a trivial change to the runner. I
will reply tomorrow. I am at a pub right now. To you, cheers :)
On Aug 7, 2014 11:36 PM, "Ryan Ernst" wrote:
> Only in the last month or so did I learn that -Dtests.iters doesn't
> really "work". What I mean is in regards to
Only in the last month or so did I learn that -Dtests.iters doesn't
really "work". What I mean is in regards to randomization. Each
iteration currently is *exactly* the same as far as randomization
(each iteration uses the same master seed). And because of this, I
understand that different peopl
19 matches
Mail list logo
