If someone happens to step forward to be a release manager for 6.7,
someone (could be the same someone, or someone else) needs to also
step forward to do the Ref Guide for 6.7. I'm the one that usually
does most of the work for the Solr Ref Guide, and I don't have time in
the next 2 months to do 6.
Le jeu. 10 août 2017 à 15:52, Erick Erickson a
écrit :
> I've never understood this. Why? I realize we don't want to keep
> release 6.x forever, but what is it about a week in this case that's
> so horrible? We're not talking about introducing back-compat issues
> here.
>
We only have backward-c
Well, unfortunately I'm headed off on a 10 day vacation next week.
Mostly I'm trying to make sure we make a conscious decision about 6.7
rather than just let it slide until after 7.0 then regret not putting
the effort in now.
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 9:42 AM, Anshum Gupta wrote:
> Just out of c
Just out of curiosity, do we have a plan here? Erick, I assume you are
willing to work on the release?
As much as I am not convinced with the idea of the 6.7 release, I wouldn't
oppose it and would want to work with whoever is the release manager.
-Anshum
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 6:52 AM Erick Er
I've never understood this. Why? I realize we don't want to keep
release 6.x forever, but what is it about a week in this case that's
so horrible? We're not talking about introducing back-compat issues
here.
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 2:43 AM, Adrien Grand wrote:
> Releasing 6.7 means we cannot star
Releasing 6.7 means we cannot start the 7.0 release process until 6.7 is
out. Do we really want to delay 7.0 even more? I won't object to releasing
6.7 but if we want to do it let's get a vote started today.
Le mer. 9 août 2017 à 22:31, Jan Høydahl a écrit :
> +1
>
>
> Den 9. aug. 2017 kl. 20.18
+1
> Den 9. aug. 2017 kl. 20.18 skrev David Smiley :
>
> +1
> I think a 6.7 release would be very good.
>
>> On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 5:46 PM Mike Drob wrote:
>> +1
>>
>> Release early, release often!
>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 4:27 PM, Erick Erickson
>>> wrote:
>>> Solr and Lucene have
+1
I think a 6.7 release would be very good.
On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 5:46 PM Mike Drob wrote:
> +1
>
> Release early, release often!
>
> On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 4:27 PM, Erick Erickson
> wrote:
>
>> Solr and Lucene have had fixes backported to 6x (not 6.6) since the
>> 7.0 label was set, most in
+1
Release early, release often!
On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 4:27 PM, Erick Erickson
wrote:
> Solr and Lucene have had fixes backported to 6x (not 6.6) since the
> 7.0 label was set, most in Solr. Some of the fixes are useful "in the
> field", I've back-ported some of them myself.
>
> What objection
Solr and Lucene have had fixes backported to 6x (not 6.6) since the
7.0 label was set, most in Solr. Some of the fixes are useful "in the
field", I've back-ported some of them myself.
What objections are there to a 6.7 release? We'd always prefer to
release nothing except important bug fixes on a
10 matches
Mail list logo