[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-5.x-Solaris (multiarch/jdk1.7.0) - Build # 323 - Failure!

Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-5.x-Solaris/323/ Java: multiarch/jdk1.7.0 -d32 -server -XX:+UseSerialGC 1 tests failed. FAILED: junit.framework.TestSuite.org.apache.solr.handler.TestSolrConfigHandlerCloud Error Message: ObjectTracker found 3 object(s) that were not

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-NightlyTests-trunk - Build # 908 - Still Failing

Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-NightlyTests-trunk/908/ 3 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.cloud.CollectionsAPIDistributedZkTest.test Error Message: Captured an uncaught exception in thread: Thread[id=17222, name=collection5, state=RUNNABLE,

Re: Moving Lucene / Solr from SVN to Git

I don't think there is a current plan to change how we do business. Just a change in where the master copy is hosted. We already have JIRA, dev, commit procedures, and integration with GitHub pull requests. All that will stay the same. No need to overthink it. - Mark On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at

[jira] [Assigned] (SOLR-8522) ImplicitSnitch to support IPv4 based tags

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8522?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Noble Paul reassigned SOLR-8522: Assignee: Noble Paul > ImplicitSnitch to support IPv4 based tags >

[jira] [Created] (SOLR-8533) Raise default maxUpdateConnections and maxUpdateConnectionsPerHost to 100k each.

Mark Miller created SOLR-8533: - Summary: Raise default maxUpdateConnections and maxUpdateConnectionsPerHost to 100k each. Key: SOLR-8533 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8533 Project: Solr

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-8531) ZK leader path changed in 5.4

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8531?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15091427#comment-15091427 ] Jeff Wartes commented on SOLR-8531: --- I just looked again, and 5.4 is indeed writing the leader data to

[JENKINS-EA] Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux (32bit/jdk-9-ea+95) - Build # 15511 - Failure!

Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux/15511/ Java: 32bit/jdk-9-ea+95 -client -XX:+UseParallelGC -XX:-CompactStrings 1 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.handler.TestReplicationHandler.doTestIndexAndConfigAliasReplication Error Message: Index: 0, Size: 0 Stack Trace:

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-8097) Implement a builder pattern for constructing a Solrj client

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8097?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15091375#comment-15091375 ] Shawn Heisey commented on SOLR-8097: Code written and compiled with a particular version of SolrJ

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-trunk-MacOSX (64bit/jdk1.8.0) - Build # 3009 - Failure!

Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-MacOSX/3009/ Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0 -XX:-UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseG1GC 1 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.cloud.DistribDocExpirationUpdateProcessorTest.test Error Message: There are still nodes recoverying - waited for 30 seconds

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SOLR-8097) Implement a builder pattern for constructing a Solrj client

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8097?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15091375#comment-15091375 ] Shawn Heisey edited comment on SOLR-8097 at 1/11/16 4:03 AM: - Code written and

[JENKINS-EA] Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux (64bit/jdk-9-ea+95) - Build # 15512 - Still Failing!

Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux/15512/ Java: 64bit/jdk-9-ea+95 -XX:-UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseSerialGC -XX:-CompactStrings 1 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.cloud.HttpPartitionTest.test Error Message: Didn't see all replicas for shard shard1 in c8n_1x2 come

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-5.x-MacOSX (64bit/jdk1.8.0) - Build # 2955 - Failure!

Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-5.x-MacOSX/2955/ Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0 -XX:-UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseG1GC 1 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.cloud.CollectionsAPIDistributedZkTest.test Error Message: Stack Trace: java.lang.AssertionError at

[JENKINS-EA] Lucene-Solr-5.x-Linux (32bit/jdk-9-ea+95) - Build # 15217 - Failure!

Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-5.x-Linux/15217/ Java: 32bit/jdk-9-ea+95 -server -XX:+UseG1GC -XX:-CompactStrings 1 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.lucene.analysis.cn.smart.TestSmartChineseAnalyzer.testRandomHugeStrings Error Message: Stack Trace: java.lang.AssertionError

RE: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-SmokeRelease-5.x - Build # 430 - Still Failing

Hi, > >> Looks like ASF Jenkins's lucene slave is running out of disk space (again): > >> > >>> [smoker][junit4] java.io.IOException: No space left on device > >> > >> Uwe, opinions on what to do? Should we ask Infra for more disk space > >> (again)? > > I’m guessing you must have done the

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-NightlyTests-5.3 - Build # 10 - Still Failing

Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-NightlyTests-5.3/10/ 2 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.cloud.CollectionsAPIDistributedZkTest.test Error Message: Captured an uncaught exception in thread: Thread[id=53068, name=collection2, state=RUNNABLE,

[JENKINS-EA] Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux (32bit/jdk-9-ea+95) - Build # 15513 - Still Failing!

Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux/15513/ Java: 32bit/jdk-9-ea+95 -server -XX:+UseParallelGC -XX:-CompactStrings 3 tests failed. FAILED: junit.framework.TestSuite.org.apache.solr.cloud.SaslZkACLProviderTest Error Message: 5 threads leaked from SUITE scope at

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-Tests-5.x-Java7 - Build # 3917 - Failure

Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-Tests-5.x-Java7/3917/ 3 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.cloud.CollectionsAPIDistributedZkTest.test Error Message: Error from server at https://127.0.0.1:53099/awholynewcollection_0: non ok status: 500, message:Server Error Stack Trace:

Re: Moving Lucene / Solr from SVN to Git

A few unrelated answers: 1) I would remove everything from SVN, add a commit informing about the move to git, then import all this up-to-date history into git (I volunteer to do this) and revert the last commit (in git). This way the history is complete, including SVN->git move. Note this would

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-8475) Some refactoring to SolrIndexSearcher

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8475?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15090950#comment-15090950 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-8475: --- Commit 1723910 from [~shaie]

[JENKINS-EA] Lucene-Solr-5.x-Linux (32bit/jdk-9-ea+95) - Build # 15206 - Failure!

Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-5.x-Linux/15206/ Java: 32bit/jdk-9-ea+95 -client -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC -XX:-CompactStrings 2 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.cloud.CustomCollectionTest.test Error Message: expected:<3> but was:<0> Stack Trace: java.lang.AssertionError:

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-NightlyTests-5.x - Build # 1071 - Still Failing

Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-NightlyTests-5.x/1071/ 1 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.cloud.CollectionsAPIDistributedZkTest.test Error Message: Captured an uncaught exception in thread: Thread[id=11471, name=collection1, state=RUNNABLE,

[jira] [Resolved] (SOLR-8475) Some refactoring to SolrIndexSearcher

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8475?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Shai Erera resolved SOLR-8475. -- Resolution: Fixed Committed to trunk only, since 6.0 seems very close, no point back porting this issue

Re: Moving Lucene / Solr from SVN to Git

Hi Dawid, The problem I've had with Git is not that the basic model is hard to understand -- it's that the basic model seems inadequate for many things, so there's been a huge proliferation of mysterious switches that are poorly documented and also very very powerful. svn has a few of these, but

[JENKINS-EA] Lucene-Solr-5.x-Linux (64bit/jdk-9-ea+95) - Build # 15208 - Failure!

Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-5.x-Linux/15208/ Java: 64bit/jdk-9-ea+95 -XX:+UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseSerialGC -XX:-CompactStrings 1 tests failed. FAILED: junit.framework.TestSuite.org.apache.solr.handler.TestReplicationHandler Error Message: ObjectTracker found 2

RE: Breaking Java back-compat in Solr

can you also add this to lucene pom.xml ? Martin __ From: ser...@gmail.com Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2016 07:57:26 + Subject: Re: Breaking Java

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-5.x-Solaris (64bit/jdk1.8.0) - Build # 321 - Failure!

Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-5.x-Solaris/321/ Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0 -XX:+UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseG1GC 3 tests failed. FAILED: junit.framework.TestSuite.org.apache.solr.core.TestLazyCores Error Message: ObjectTracker found 4 object(s) that were not released!!!

Re: Breaking Java back-compat in Solr

I think that our Maven integration only publishes Lucene/Solr artifacts to Maven central, but I don't think the POMs actually produce the artifacts? I could be wrong though ... If that's the case, then we'd need to only add these to Solr's build.xml, like it's done in Lucene. Shai On Sun, Jan

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-NightlyTests-5.3 - Build # 9 - Still Failing

Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-NightlyTests-5.3/9/ 2 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.cloud.CollectionsAPIDistributedZkTest.test Error Message: Error from server at http://127.0.0.1:45328: Error CREATEing SolrCore 'halfcollection_shard1_replica1': Unable to create core

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-6955) The release smoke tester inappropriately requires back compat index testing for versions not less than the one being smoke tested

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6955?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15091110#comment-15091110 ] Steve Rowe commented on LUCENE-6955: bq. Testing this patch now. {noformat} [smoker] confirm

Re: Moving Lucene / Solr from SVN to Git

So Karl, are you really the one who gave Monroe this idea? https://xkcd.com/1597/ don't forget hover the mouse for the pop-up ;) On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 1:52 AM, Karl Wright wrote: > Hi Dawid, > > The problem I've had with Git is not that the basic model is hard to >

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-5.x-Linux (64bit/jdk1.8.0_66) - Build # 15210 - Failure!

Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-5.x-Linux/15210/ Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0_66 -XX:-UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC 1 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.lucene.codecs.lucene54.TestLucene54DocValuesFormat.testSparseDocValuesVsStoredFields Error Message: Invalid vInt detected

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-5.x-Windows (32bit/jdk1.7.0_80) - Build # 5408 - Failure!

Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-5.x-Windows/5408/ Java: 32bit/jdk1.7.0_80 -client -XX:+UseParallelGC 1 tests failed. FAILED: junit.framework.TestSuite.org.apache.solr.handler.TestSolrConfigHandlerCloud Error Message: ObjectTracker found 3 object(s) that were not released!!!

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-6955) The release smoke tester inappropriately requires back compat index testing for versions not less than the one being smoke tested

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6955?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15091196#comment-15091196 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-6955: - Commit 1723961 from

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-6955) The release smoke tester inappropriately requires back compat index testing for versions not less than the one being smoke tested

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6955?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Steve Rowe updated LUCENE-6955: --- Fix Version/s: Trunk 5.5 5.2.2 4.10.5

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SOLR-8492) Add LogisticRegressionQuery and LogitStream

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8492?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15091233#comment-15091233 ] Joel Bernstein edited comment on SOLR-8492 at 1/10/16 8:57 PM: ---

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-8492) Add LogisticRegressionQuery and LogitStream

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8492?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15091233#comment-15091233 ] Joel Bernstein commented on SOLR-8492: -- [~caomanhdat], I was comparing the algorithm in the patch you

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-8492) Add LogisticRegressionQuery and LogitStream

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8492?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Joel Bernstein updated SOLR-8492: - Attachment: SOLR-8492.patch New patch which moves the test for LogitStream from StreamingTest to

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-8492) Add LogisticRegressionQuery and LogitStream

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8492?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Joel Bernstein updated SOLR-8492: - Attachment: (was: SOLR-8492.patch) > Add LogisticRegressionQuery and LogitStream >

Re: Moving Lucene / Solr from SVN to Git

Erick, I found this tutorial really helped me to get my head around git: http://pcottle.github.io/learnGitBranching/ You get to play making commits directly via that web UI, which shows you how commits happen, merges, etc. Upayavira On Sun, Jan 10, 2016, at 06:15 PM, Erick Erickson wrote: >

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-6955) The release smoke tester inappropriately requires back compat index testing for versions not less than the one being smoke tested

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6955?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15091178#comment-15091178 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-6955: - Commit 1723956 from

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-SmokeRelease-5.3 - Build # 11 - Still Failing

I committed a fix: LUCENE-6955. - Steve > On Jan 9, 2016, at 3:29 PM, Apache Jenkins Server > wrote: > > Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-SmokeRelease-5.3/11/ > > No tests ran. > > Build Log: > [...truncated 53068 lines...] >

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-trunk-Solaris (64bit/jdk1.8.0) - Build # 326 - Failure!

Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Solaris/326/ Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0 -XX:+UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseG1GC 1 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.cloud.BasicDistributedZkTest.test Error Message: IOException occured when talking to server at:

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-8492) Add LogisticRegressionQuery and LogitStream

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8492?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Joel Bernstein updated SOLR-8492: - Attachment: SOLR-8492.patch > Add LogisticRegressionQuery and LogitStream >

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-6955) The release smoke tester inappropriately requires back compat index testing for versions not less than the one being smoke tested

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6955?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15091200#comment-15091200 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-6955: - Commit 1723963 from

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-6955) The release smoke tester inappropriately requires back compat index testing for versions not less than the one being smoke tested

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6955?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15091199#comment-15091199 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-6955: - Commit 1723962 from

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-6955) The release smoke tester inappropriately requires back compat index testing for versions not less than the one being smoke tested

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6955?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15091203#comment-15091203 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-6955: - Commit 1723964 from

Re: Moving Lucene / Solr from SVN to Git

Will anybody be able to create a pull request and then only committers perform the merge operation? (I presume so, but... just for clarity, especially for those not git-savvy yet.) Would patches still be added to Jira requests, or simply a link to a pull request? (Again, I presume the latter, but

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-6955) The release smoke tester inappropriately requires back compat index testing for versions not less than the one being smoke tested

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6955?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15091180#comment-15091180 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-6955: - Commit 1723957 from

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-6955) The release smoke tester inappropriately requires back compat index testing for versions not less than the one being smoke tested

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6955?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15091192#comment-15091192 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-6955: - Commit 1723959 from

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-6955) The release smoke tester inappropriately requires back compat index testing for versions not less than the one being smoke tested

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6955?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15091189#comment-15091189 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-6955: - Commit 1723958 from

[jira] [Resolved] (LUCENE-6955) The release smoke tester inappropriately requires back compat index testing for versions not less than the one being smoke tested

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6955?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Steve Rowe resolved LUCENE-6955. Resolution: Fixed Committed to trunk, branch_5x, lucene_solr_5_4, lucene_solr_5_3,

Re: Moving Lucene / Solr from SVN to Git

> The problem I've had with Git is not that the basic model is hard to > understand -- it's that the basic model seems inadequate for many things, so > there's been a huge proliferation of mysterious switches that are poorly Can you give an example when it's "not adequate"? For what it's worth --

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-8097) Implement a builder pattern for constructing a Solrj client

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8097?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15091257#comment-15091257 ] Jason Gerlowski commented on SOLR-8097: --- My comment above implies some questions about the measures

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SOLR-8492) Add LogisticRegressionQuery and LogitStream

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8492?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15091233#comment-15091233 ] Joel Bernstein edited comment on SOLR-8492 at 1/10/16 10:11 PM:

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-8002) Add field alias support to Parallel SQL Interface

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8002?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Joel Bernstein updated SOLR-8002: - Summary: Add field alias support to Parallel SQL Interface (was: Field aliases support for SQL

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-8002) Add field alias support to the Parallel SQL Interface

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8002?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Joel Bernstein updated SOLR-8002: - Summary: Add field alias support to the Parallel SQL Interface (was: Add field alias support to

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-8492) Add LogisticRegressionQuery and LogitStream

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8492?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15091290#comment-15091290 ] Cao Manh Dat commented on SOLR-8492: He still use Gradient Descent {code} Gradient[i] =

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-6968) LSH Filter

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6968?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Cao Manh Dat updated LUCENE-6968: - Description: I'm planning to implement LSH. Which support query like this {quote} Find similar

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-5.x-Linux (64bit/jdk1.8.0_66) - Build # 15210 - Failure!

It reproduces! I haven't tried to dig ... Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 9:58 AM, Policeman Jenkins Server wrote: > Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-5.x-Linux/15210/ > Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0_66 -XX:-UseCompressedOops

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-8002) Field aliases support for SQL queries

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8002?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Joel Bernstein updated SOLR-8002: - Fix Version/s: 6 > Field aliases support for SQL queries > - >

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-8002) Field aliases support for SQL queries

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8002?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Joel Bernstein updated SOLR-8002: - Fix Version/s: (was: 6) 6.0 > Field aliases support for SQL queries >

[jira] [Assigned] (SOLR-8002) Field aliases support for SQL queries

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8002?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Joel Bernstein reassigned SOLR-8002: Assignee: Joel Bernstein > Field aliases support for SQL queries >

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SOLR-8492) Add LogisticRegressionQuery and LogitStream

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8492?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15091290#comment-15091290 ] Cao Manh Dat edited comment on SOLR-8492 at 1/11/16 12:10 AM: -- He still use

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-SmokeRelease-5.x - Build # 430 - Still Failing

Hi Uwe, > On Jan 7, 2016, at 5:20 PM, Uwe Schindler wrote: > > No, we should delete the deleted Job's workspaces. If you delete a job > without first deleting the workspace it is kept on disk (which is a bug in > older Jenkins versions as used by ASF). So you have to

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SOLR-8492) Add LogisticRegressionQuery and LogitStream

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8492?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15091290#comment-15091290 ] Cao Manh Dat edited comment on SOLR-8492 at 1/11/16 1:05 AM: - He still use

[jira] [Created] (SOLR-8532) Optimize GraphQuery when maxDepth is set

Kevin Watters created SOLR-8532: --- Summary: Optimize GraphQuery when maxDepth is set Key: SOLR-8532 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8532 Project: Solr Issue Type: Bug