Re: Solr Admin UI Refresh 2020

In phase 2, will the admin ui be running in the same jetty container as the solr application? On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 4:35 PM Marcus Eagan wrote: > SIP here: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SOLR/Updated+Solr+Admin+UI > > On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 9:32 AM Gus Heck wrote: > >> If

Re: 7.7.3 bugfix release

thanks Adrien On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 6:22 PM Adrien Grand wrote: > > FYI I just re-enabled 7.7 builds on the Apache Jenkins. > > On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 10:17 PM jim ferenczi wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Ì merged LUCENE-9300 in the 7.7 branch. >> >> > I shall cut the branch in a day or two >> >> I

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 7.7.3 RC1

+1 SUCCESS! [0:55:50.289256] On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 2:48 PM Atri Sharma wrote: > > +1 > > SUCCESS! [0:44:583254] > > On Wed, 22 Apr 2020 at 00:16, Gus Heck wrote: >> >> +1 (linux ubuntu 18.04) >> >> SUCCESS! [0:43:51.661530] >> >> On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 12:44 PM Houston Putman >> wrote:

Overseer documentation

Hello Solr devs, This is my first post here. I work at Salesforce in France, we're adopting SolrCloud and we need it to scale more than it currently does. I've looked at Overseer and documented my understanding. I'm sharing the result, it might help others and is a way to get feedback (I might

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 7.7.3 RC1

+1 SUCCESS! [0:44:583254] On Wed, 22 Apr 2020 at 00:16, Gus Heck wrote: > +1 (linux ubuntu 18.04) > > SUCCESS! [0:43:51.661530] > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 12:44 PM Houston Putman > wrote: > >> +1 >> >> >> SUCCESS! [1:23:37.392736] >> >> I also ran the multi-valued field performance test on

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 7.7.3 RC1

+1 (linux ubuntu 18.04) SUCCESS! [0:43:51.661530] On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 12:44 PM Houston Putman wrote: > +1 > > > SUCCESS! [1:23:37.392736] > > I also ran the multi-valued field performance test on 7.7.2 and 7.7.3 > (rc1) to make sure that the backport of SOLR-14013 >

Re: Require consistency between different data-structures sharing the same field name as of 9.0?

+1 We already have a minimal enforcement of consistent schema in IndexWriter. It checks that you are not trying to change the doc values type for a given field, e.g. from NUMERIC to SORTED. Maybe we could add these new checks there? E.g., if this field was previously indexed with both doc

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 7.7.3 RC1

+1 SUCCESS! [1:23:37.392736] I also ran the multi-valued field performance test on 7.7.2 and 7.7.3 (rc1) to make sure that the backport of SOLR-14013 was successful. Definitely looks like it was. *Indexing test* 7.7.2 0m0.558s 7.7.3

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 7.7.3 RC1

+1 SUCCESS! [0:48:12.629243] On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 12:29 PM Michael McCandless < luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: > +1 > > SUCCESS! [0:36:47.309043] > > Mike McCandless > > http://blog.mikemccandless.com > > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 12:22 PM Kevin Risden wrote: > >> +1 SUCCESS!

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 7.7.3 RC1

+1 SUCCESS! [0:36:47.309043] Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 12:22 PM Kevin Risden wrote: > +1 SUCCESS! [1:38:36.140929] > > Kevin Risden > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 10:09 AM Ignacio Vera wrote: > > > > No issues here > > > > +1 SUCCESS!

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 7.7.3 RC1

+1 SUCCESS! [1:38:36.140929] Kevin Risden On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 10:09 AM Ignacio Vera wrote: > > No issues here > > +1 SUCCESS! [1:20:57.847225] > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 3:33 PM Jan Høydahl wrote: >> >> SUCCESS! [1:05:02.194590] >> No issues >> >> +1 (did not additional manual checking

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 7.7.3 RC1

No issues here +1 SUCCESS! [1:20:57.847225] On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 3:33 PM Jan Høydahl wrote: > SUCCESS! [1:05:02.194590] > No issues > > +1 (did not additional manual checking than running the smoketester) > > Jan > > > 21. apr. 2020 kl. 12:27 skrev Andrzej Białecki : > > > > Hi, > > > > I’m

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 7.7.3 RC1

SUCCESS! [1:05:02.194590] No issues +1 (did not additional manual checking than running the smoketester) Jan > 21. apr. 2020 kl. 12:27 skrev Andrzej Białecki : > > Hi, > > I’m getting the following error, looks like the checksum doesn’t match the > file: > > Test Solr... > test basics... >

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 7.7.3 RC1

Did anyone else try the build? On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 8:31 PM Andrzej Białecki wrote: > > Hi, > > I’m getting the following error, looks like the checksum doesn’t match the > file: > > Test Solr... > test basics... > check changes HTML... > download solr-7.7.3-src.tgz... > 56.9 MB in

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 7.7.3 RC1

I didn't get the same error as Andrzej while running the smoketester. +1 SUCCESS! [3:49:55.694980] On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 12:31 PM Andrzej Białecki wrote: > Hi, > > I’m getting the following error, looks like the checksum doesn’t match the > file: > > Test Solr... > test basics... > check

Re: Require consistency between different data-structures sharing the same field name as of 9.0?

Thanks all, the initial feedback sounds positive so I opened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9334. As Mike pointed out, this could be a first step towards having something that looks more like a proper schema. I like the idea of exposing higher-level abstractions, like a field that

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 7.7.3 RC1

Hi, I’m getting the following error, looks like the checksum doesn’t match the file: Test Solr... test basics... check changes HTML... download solr-7.7.3-src.tgz... 56.9 MB in 586.29 sec (0.1 MB/sec) verify sha512 digest Traceback (most recent call last): File

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 7.7.3 RC1

sorry, the direct command is python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-7.7.3-RC1-rev1a0d2a901dfec93676b0fe8be425101ceb754b85/ On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 6:15 PM Noble Paul wrote: > > Please vote for release candidate ? for

Re: Lucene/Solr 8.5.1 bugfix release

I just disabled the Apache Jenkins builds for 8.5. On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 2:04 PM Adrien Grand wrote: > Solr doesn't use addIndexes(Directory) so this is not relevant to Solr > indeed. > > On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 11:40 AM Ignacio Vera wrote: > >> I updated the Solr's release announcement so

Re: 7.7.3 bugfix release

FYI I just re-enabled 7.7 builds on the Apache Jenkins. On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 10:17 PM jim ferenczi wrote: > Hi, > > Ì merged LUCENE-9300 in > the 7.7 branch. > > > I shall cut the branch in a day or two > > I guess you meant create the

[VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 7.7.3 RC1

Please vote for release candidate ? for Lucene/Solr 7.7.3 The artifacts can be downloaded from: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-7.7.3-RC1-rev1a0d2a901dfec93676b0fe8be425101ceb754b85 You can run the smoke tester directly with this command: python3 -u