I just disabled the Apache Jenkins builds for 8.5. On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 2:04 PM Adrien Grand <[email protected]> wrote:
> Solr doesn't use addIndexes(Directory) so this is not relevant to Solr > indeed. > > On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 11:40 AM Ignacio Vera <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I updated the Solr's release announcement so there is no changes. I think >> the Lucene's bug fix is not relevant for Solr. >> >> On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 11:23 AM Jan Høydahl <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> If RC1 is released with a non-working SOLR-14359, then please change >>> Solr’s release announcement. Not sure whether the Lucene-bugfix is valid >>> for Solr users, in that case it can be highlighted instead? >>> >>> Jan >>> >>> 7. apr. 2020 kl. 10:13 skrev Ignacio Vera <[email protected]>: >>> >>> Here are the drafts for the release notes, let me know if there is >>> something you wish to change: >>> >>> Lucene: >>> >>> >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/resumedraft.action?draftId=148645634&draftShareId=e835ddb5-3bb9-4b33-b6ad-1770e0a95327&src=shareui&src.shareui.timestamp=1586247034772 >>> >>> Solr: >>> >>> >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/resumedraft.action?draftId=148645636&draftShareId=c4a8eb5f-08d0-40db-a877-b94adb383061&src=shareui&src.shareui.timestamp=1586247001694 >>> >>> As I reminder I am planning to build the first RC tomorrow, Wednesday >>> April 8th. >>> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 8:37 AM Ignacio Vera <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Thanks Jan, I see SOLR-14359 >>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14359> has already >>>> been back ported to branch 8.5, I am ok with SOLR-14317 >>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14317> backporting as >>>> well. I am planning to build the first RC this coming Wednesday. Let me >>>> know if that works for you. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sat, Apr 4, 2020 at 12:25 AM Jan Høydahl <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Also this coould be a backport candidate: SOLR-14317 >>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14317> >>>>> HttpClusterStateProvider >>>>> throws exception when only one node down >>>>> >>>>> Jan >>>>> >>>>> 3. apr. 2020 kl. 22:29 skrev Jan Høydahl <[email protected]>: >>>>> >>>>> I plan to merge this to branch_8_5 >>>>> >>>>> *SOLR-14359 >>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14359> Admin UI has "Select an >>>>> option" for collections and cores drop-downs* >>>>> >>>>> Jan >>>>> >>>>> 3. apr. 2020 kl. 14:15 skrev jim ferenczi <[email protected]>: >>>>> >>>>> +1, thanks Ignacio. >>>>> I merged the fix for LUCENE-9300 >>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9300> and backported to >>>>> the 8.5 branch. >>>>> >>>>> Le jeu. 2 avr. 2020 à 21:48, Adrien Grand <[email protected]> a >>>>> écrit : >>>>> >>>>>> My general take on this is that it's ok to upgrade a dependency in a >>>>>> patch release if the dependency upgrade itself is a new patch release of >>>>>> the same minor version. The changelog of Tika 1.24 seems to include not >>>>>> only bug fixes but also some enhancements[1], so I'd rather do a 8.6 >>>>>> release in the near future than backport this dependency upgrade to 8.5. >>>>>> >>>>>> [1] https://tika.apache.org/1.24/index.html >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 9:33 PM Cassandra Targett < >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Should we consider backporting SOLR-14367 (the most recent Tika >>>>>>> upgrade)? It addresses a CVE in Tika, and while I think we usually avoid >>>>>>> changing 3rd party component versions in patch releases, but maybe we >>>>>>> should in this case? The upgrade also looks like it was pretty >>>>>>> straightforward (drop-in replacement). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cassandra >>>>>>> On Apr 2, 2020, 12:47 PM -0500, Ignacio Vera <[email protected]>, >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I propose a quick 8.5.1 bugfix release and I volunteer as RM. The >>>>>>> main motivation for this release is LUCENE-9300 where Jim addressed a >>>>>>> serious bug that can lead to data corruption when merging indices via >>>>>>> IW#addIndices. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If there are no objections I am planning to create a RC early next >>>>>>> week. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Ignacio >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Adrien >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> > > -- > Adrien > -- Adrien
