Re: Separate Solr build: help with the remaining last mile needed.

2021-03-04 Thread Dawid Weiss
> ./gradlew -Dskip.lucene=true assemble check -x test -x documentation > -x checkBrokenLinks -x checkLocalJavadocLinksSite I made Solr documentation compile last night. Some of the generated links point at void (and thus the broken links checker fails) but I think it's enough to make the

Modify Lucene to make it an inverted index suitable for cloud native environment

2021-03-04 Thread f...@lucene.cn
With the landing of lxdb, I always feel that there is something missing. Before lxdb started, I took a pen and drew what kind of database is the perfect database in my mind. Now that the main design goal has been completed, I still feel that it is not perfect. In essence, Lucene, the core of

Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 8.8.1

2021-03-04 Thread Phil
+1 from me Tested the extension args output in JCC 3.9 - looks good! Thanks, Phil. Andi Vajda writes: > The PyLucene 8.8.1 (rc1) release tracking the recent release of > Apache Lucene 8.8.1 is ready. > > A release candidate is available from: >

Re: Separate Solr build: help with the remaining last mile needed.

2021-03-04 Thread Dawid Weiss
Thanks, Houston! On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 7:54 PM Houston Putman wrote: > > Aha it's broken independently of your PR. I'll try to fix it, sorry for the > noise. > > - Houston > > On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 1:48 PM Dawid Weiss wrote: >> >> Thanks. I might have broken something... but it seems

Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 8.8.1

2021-03-04 Thread Dawid Weiss
Apologies for being late to the party: +1 from me. D. On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 3:35 AM Andi Vajda wrote: > > > The PyLucene 8.8.1 (rc1) release tracking the recent release of > Apache Lucene 8.8.1 is ready. > > A release candidate is available from: >

Re: Separate Solr build: help with the remaining last mile needed.

2021-03-04 Thread Houston Putman
Aha it's broken independently of your PR. I'll try to fix it, sorry for the noise. - Houston On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 1:48 PM Dawid Weiss wrote: > Thanks. I might have broken something... but it seems unlikely. I > merely shuffled some things around - it should be an identical build. > > D. > >

Re: Separate Solr build: help with the remaining last mile needed.

2021-03-04 Thread Dawid Weiss
Thanks. I might have broken something... but it seems unlikely. I merely shuffled some things around - it should be an identical build. D. On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 7:45 PM Houston Putman wrote: > > It worked as of 10 days ago: >

Re: Separate Solr build: help with the remaining last mile needed.

2021-03-04 Thread Houston Putman
It worked as of 10 days ago: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/actions/workflows/docker-test.yml I created a test PR to see if it works based on master: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2454 On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 1:39 PM Dawid Weiss wrote: > Thanks Houston. Is this failure on

Re: Separate Solr build: help with the remaining last mile needed.

2021-03-04 Thread Dawid Weiss
Thanks Houston. Is this failure on the branch only (does it work on master)? Dawid On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 6:48 PM Houston Putman wrote: > > I'm not sure why the docker github action is failing... I've tried it locally > and it works fine. I'll do some more investigation. > > On Thu, Mar 4,

Re: Separate Solr build: help with the remaining last mile needed.

2021-03-04 Thread Houston Putman
I'm not sure why the docker github action is failing... I've tried it locally and it works fine. I'll do some more investigation. On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 3:25 AM Dawid Weiss wrote: > Hi folks, > > I'll need some help with some remaining tasks to make the transition > easier after the solr repo

Re: Configurable Postings Block Size?

2021-03-04 Thread Greg Miller
Thanks Robert. I've created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9822 and will attach a patch shortly. Cheers, -Greg On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 6:21 PM Robert Muir wrote: > I think its a good idea, especially if the assert can be in a good place > (ideally a not-so-hot place, e.g.

Re: Serializatio/Deserialization of Lucene objects like queries, sort fields etc

2021-03-04 Thread jitesh129
Thanks Mike for the quick response. Michael McCandless-2 wrote > Hello, > >> Recently we upgraded our Lucene core libraries from v2.9.4 to v8.7.0 > >>Wow! That is the biggest version jump I have heard of in some time :) Did > you have to also migrate an index all that way? Or, you fully

Re: Serializatio/Deserialization of Lucene objects like queries, sort fields etc

2021-03-04 Thread Michael McCandless
Hello, > Recently we upgraded our Lucene core libraries from v2.9.4 to v8.7.0 Wow! That is the biggest version jump I have heard of in some time :) Did you have to also migrate an index all that way? Or, you fully re-indexed on you were on 8.7.0? > as all the lucene classes have been changed

Re: Solr webpage SEO

2021-03-04 Thread Uwe Schindler
I disagree with excluding older Java docs or refguide using robots! When I look for documentation of a class I generally enter class name and version number into google. We can maybe handle this with priorities inside a sitemap.xml or custom http headers (X-Robots) using a htaccess rule. I can

Re: Solr webpage SEO

2021-03-04 Thread Uwe Schindler
We can change the confluence redirects to use the url without Version number. The htaccess of Solr webpage redirects then automatically to latest version of refguide. This is done by the pelican variable on website deployment. This link redirects automatically, so if we change the confluence

Re: Solr webpage SEO

2021-03-04 Thread Jan Høydahl
Sure we could do robots. But I suspect that we put ourselves in this situation through https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10595 ourselves Check out the attachment solr_redirects.conf on that JIRA (also here https://gist.github.com/janhoy/a3149e1ed27df020194a2de1a7fa2c16) Here, we

Serializatio/Deserialization of Lucene objects like queries, sort fields etc

2021-03-04 Thread jitesh129
Hello All, Recently we upgraded our Lucene core libraries from v2.9.4 to v8.7.0 and as all the lucene classes have been changed to non-serializable and since we are using RPC for invoking the search queries we ran into bunch of NotSerializableException. I went through various forums which

Re: Solr webpage SEO

2021-03-04 Thread Ishan Chattopadhyaya
We can add robots.txt to stop Google from indexing/showing in results. On Thu, 4 Mar, 2021, 2:34 pm Jan Høydahl, wrote: > Hi, sending to this list since dev@solr list is not yet announced > properly. > > We have a few days of traffic to the new site and can see the most visited > pages at

Solr webpage SEO

2021-03-04 Thread Jan Høydahl
Hi, sending to this list since dev@solr list is not yet announced properly. We have a few days of traffic to the new site and can see the most visited pages at https://uls.apache.org/exports/solr.apache.org.yaml (see copy below). When I search google for "solr query parser", I get the 6.6 guide

Separate Solr build: help with the remaining last mile needed.

2021-03-04 Thread Dawid Weiss
Hi folks, I'll need some help with some remaining tasks to make the transition easier after the solr repo split. I've made some changes to allow building just Solr or just Lucene on master -- https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2448 1. I really don't know much about docker testing and