Hi Uwe,
The panama branch no longer reads unsafe so the new test on main fails
after the merge:
org.apache.lucene.core.tests.TestMMap.testUnmapSupported
I've allowed myself to correct it on your branch to shut up jenkins, but
please revert or tune to your liking.
D.
On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at
Am 21.12.21 um 18:49 schrieb Michael Sokolov:
interesting -- it always matches *something* I guess?
yes, but this is something I would like to improve, that it knows when
it does not know :-)
I understand Lucene provides a score, but just defining a threshold
doesn't really solve the
interesting -- it always matches *something* I guess? It might be
helpful to show not only the answer, but also the question that was
matched?
On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 5:05 AM Michael Wechner
wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I am working on a webapp called "Katie" in order to detect duplicated
> questions
>
>
> I wouldn't have thought to do such a change in a minor release, but I suppose
> for tests it's fine.
I think the benefits may outweigh the inconvenience in this case. It'd
be a killer for us in the long run - all the tests would require a
manual touch in backports. I don't see how this can be
I wouldn't have thought to do such a change in a minor release, but I
suppose for tests it's fine.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 9:10 AM Uwe Schindler wrote:
> Hi,
> TortoiseGit's Viewer for diffs also helps
Hi,
TortoiseGit's Viewer for diffs also helps well. But I just quicky skimmed
through it and only stopped at classes where different changes to imports were
done.
Thanks,
Uwe
Am 21. Dezember 2021 14:01:15 UTC schrieb Robert Muir :
>On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 8:20 AM Mark Jens wrote:
>>
>> You
On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 8:20 AM Mark Jens wrote:
>
> You can use
> https://patch-diff.githubusercontent.com/raw/apache/lucene/pull/551.diff to
> render plain text and keep the browser responsive.
> Another option is
> https://patch-diff.githubusercontent.com/raw/apache/lucene/pull/551.patch to
On Tue, 21 Dec 2021 at 15:19, Mark Jens wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 20 Dec 2021 at 17:24, Robert Muir wrote:
>
>> Thanks for doing this!! Give me a few minutes, I'll verify everything
>> passes on linux, and review it locally. And I agree, sooner than later
>> is better as it will conflict with
Hi,
On Mon, 20 Dec 2021 at 17:24, Robert Muir wrote:
> Thanks for doing this!! Give me a few minutes, I'll verify everything
> passes on linux, and review it locally. And I agree, sooner than later
> is better as it will conflict with anything and everything.
>
> Due to the expected noise of
This looks interesting.
I will open bug report and contact them directly. Looks like the new long
indexed loop opts are causing this. They were added to support 64 bit loop
variables by Roland Westrelin.
Uwe
Am 21. Dezember 2021 08:28:14 UTC schrieb Dawid Weiss :
>This is a JVM failure:
>
>#
This is a JVM failure:
#
# A fatal error has been detected by the Java Runtime Environment:
#
# SIGSEGV (0xb) at pc=0x7fc59e51c84b, pid=1722975, tid=1723672
#
# JRE version: OpenJDK Runtime Environment (18.0+26) (build 18-ea+26-1787)
# Java VM: OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (18-ea+26-1787, mixed
11 matches
Mail list logo
