Re: Inlining, virtual calls and BKDPointsTree

2024-03-06 Thread Anton Hägerstrand
> I tried this and also tried benchmarking the change on 2 other types of indexes, with slightly varying attributes. They roughly correlate to indexes for different categories of products. > Performance on both throughput and latency was flat. Thank you very much for running the benchmarks and

Re: Inlining, virtual calls and BKDPointsTree

2024-03-06 Thread Gautam Worah
> I'll try tweaking the query set to target queries with more Point hits during the week and see what comes out.. I tried this and also tried benchmarking the change on 2 other types of indexes, with slightly varying attributes. They roughly correlate to indexes for different categories of

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene » Lucene-Check-main (s390x big endian) - Build # 460 - Still Failing!

2024-03-06 Thread Uwe Schindler
See this issue: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13161 The s390x server (big endian) has no Java 21 yet. I'll keep the job enabled, should work soon. Uwe Am 06.03.2024 um 23:09 schrieb Apache Jenkins Server: Build:

Re: Query about the GitHub statistics for Lucene

2024-03-06 Thread Uwe Schindler
Hi, Yes, we should contact INFRA so they get all the repository links uptodate. They should maybe send us a list of tracked repos/issue trackers for us to review. There were also some crazy things like the temporary repository, that we used to migrate our issues from JIRA to Github, be used

Re: Query about the GitHub statistics for Lucene

2024-03-06 Thread Chris Hegarty
Hi Mike, > On 6 Mar 2024, at 10:47, Michael McCandless wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 6, 2024 at 4:41 AM Chris Hegarty > wrote: > > Seems that I’ve fallen into the newbie PMC Chair rabbit hole! ;-) - the > reporting tool has long standing issues. Maybe they’re fixable, maybe not, > but it’s

Re: Query about the GitHub statistics for Lucene

2024-03-06 Thread Michael McCandless
On Wed, Mar 6, 2024 at 4:41 AM Chris Hegarty wrote: Seems that I’ve fallen into the newbie PMC Chair rabbit hole! ;-) - the > reporting tool has long standing issues. Maybe they’re fixable, maybe not, > but it’s possible we don’t necessarily need it now. > Sorry :) Seems to be a

Re: Query about the GitHub statistics for Lucene

2024-03-06 Thread Chris Hegarty
Hi, Seems that I’ve fallen into the newbie PMC Chair rabbit hole! ;-) - the reporting tool has long standing issues. Maybe they’re fixable, maybe not, but it’s possible we don’t necessarily need it now. > On 5 Mar 2024, at 18:22, Michael McCandless wrote: > > ... > @Mike. Would it be