Hi Roman,
Many thanks for your excellent mentorship!
Your #2 and #3 proposals sound good to me and I look forward to the
discussion on private@.
- Rahul
On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 10:47 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Hi!
>
> with the fifth (v1.11) release in the final stages of being cut,
> I thi
Thanks Roman.
I agree that this project is in the correct state to qualify as a TLP,
and would like to help move that forward.
In addition to the
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MADLIB/Graduation+Resolution
that you mention, we also created a check list
https://cwiki.apache.org/conflu
Thanks Ed for all your observations on RC-2 including product naming and
git revision inconsistencies.
Let us then cancel the RC-2 release. We will address issues, release RC-3
and put it up for a vote soon.
Thanks again,
Rashmi
On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 11:15 AM, Rahul Iyer wrote:
> Re: incorrec
GitHub user rvs opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-madlib/pull/130
MADLIB-1098. Corrections for MADlib naming consistency
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/rvs/incubator-madlib master
Altern
Github user njayaram2 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-madlib/pull/129#discussion_r114846053
--- Diff:
src/ports/postgres/modules/recursive_partitioning/decision_tree.py_in ---
@@ -157,25 +150,24 @@ def _classify_features(feature_to_type,
Github user rvs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-madlib/pull/130
Good point. Let me update the PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enab
Github user rvs closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-madlib/pull/130
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Is that the 5th release I see that just got posted?
Ya, time for MADlib to fly the incubator!
On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 10:48 AM, Frank McQuillan
wrote:
> Thanks Roman.
>
> I agree that this project is in the correct state to qualify as a TLP,
> and would like to help move that forward.
>
> In a
Hello MADlib community,
We have created a MADlib 1.11 RC-3, with the artifacts below (source and
convenience binaries) up for a vote.
Note that voting for the RC-2 release has been cancelled due to the need
for minor corrections based on community feedback. Sorry for the
inconvenience.
RC-3 repl