Re: New logo

2017-05-06 Thread Ted Dunning
On Sat, May 6, 2017 at 2:43 PM, Scott C. Cote wrote: > Will you be wearing “one of those t-shirts” on Monday in Houston :) ? > Not likely. It is in the archive.

RE: New logo

2017-05-06 Thread Andrew Palumbo
+1 :) Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone Original message From: "Scott C. Cote" Date: 05/06/2017 2:43 PM (GMT-08:00) To: u...@mahout.apache.org Cc: Trevor Grant , Mahout Dev List Subject: Re: New logo Will you be wearing “one of those t-shirts” on

Re: New logo

2017-05-06 Thread Ted Dunning
I know where one of those t-shirts is. On Sat, May 6, 2017 at 7:13 AM, Isabel Drost-Fromm wrote: > The green logo was the very first design iteration before iirc Robin came > up with the yellow one. The should be like five TShirts world wide with the > old logo printed in 2009. > > > Am 1. Mai

Re: New logo

2017-05-06 Thread Isabel Drost-Fromm
The green logo was the very first design iteration before iirc Robin came up with the yellow one. The should be like five TShirts world wide with the old logo printed in 2009. Am 1. Mai 2017 20:41:43 MESZ schrieb Trevor Grant : >Thanks Scott, > >You are correct- in fact we're going even further

Re: New logo

2017-05-03 Thread Pat Ferrel
Unfortunately the rules of 99designs require super fast responses from us; they have their own schedule based rules. I dropped the contest because 2 of the 4 people responding that day were against continuing and we were only on the first phase of the design. Sorry if others wanted to continue

Re: New logo

2017-05-01 Thread Ellen Friedman
Just seeing this now, so maybe too late for my vote to count, but here goes. On Process: Pat thanks for organizing. +1 to continue to work on logo. Something without the blue man or elephant is good idea. Prefer not all blue logo. On designs: My favorites two from the second batch (both are blu

Re: New logo

2017-05-01 Thread Trevor Grant
Thanks Scott, You are correct- in fact we're going even further now, that you can do native optimization regardless of the architecture with native-solvers. Do you or anyone more familiar with the history of the website know anything about the origins/uses of this: https://mahout.apache.org/image

RE: New logo

2017-04-28 Thread Nikolai Sakharnykh
attachments/84/84070/attachment_84070656 -Original Message- From: Trevor Grant [mailto:trevor.d.gr...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2017 10:28 PM To: u...@mahout.apache.org Cc: Mahout Dev List Subject: Re: New logo It also bugs me when I can't suggest any alternatives, yet don&

Re: New logo

2017-04-27 Thread Trevor Grant
It also bugs me when I can't suggest any alternatives, yet don't like the ones in front of me... I became aware of a symbol a week or so ago, and it keeps coming back to me. The Enso. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ens%C5%8D Things I like about it: (all from wikipedia, since the only thing I knew

Re: New logo

2017-04-27 Thread Trevor Grant
I didn't mean to veto- I thought we were on release rules. (at least three positives and more positives than negatives). If we're treating this as code modification (any -1 stops it dead) then I'm somewhere in the ball park of -.75. Trevor Grant Data Scientist https://github.com/rawkintrevo htt

Re: New logo

2017-04-27 Thread Ted Dunning
I haven't been active enough to feel good about an out and out -1. Put me as -0 On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 3:54 PM, Pat Ferrel wrote: > Fair enough, I think Trevor feels the same. > > The blue man can continue, all it takes is a -1 > > > On Apr 27, 2017, at 3:50 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: > > I don

Re: New logo

2017-04-27 Thread Pat Ferrel
ok, the contest is cancelled On Apr 27, 2017, at 4:10 PM, Trevor Grant wrote: I'll revise to -1. Given blue man v. all the others, I'd be indifferent. None of the new possibilities give me enough hope of something worth displacing blue man (dated though he may be, has good recognition). ^^ As

Re: New logo

2017-04-27 Thread Trevor Grant
I'll revise to -1. Given blue man v. all the others, I'd be indifferent. None of the new possibilities give me enough hope of something worth displacing blue man (dated though he may be, has good recognition). ^^ Assuming it take 3 votes to pass either way? Trevor Grant Data Scientist https://gi

Re: New logo

2017-04-27 Thread Pat Ferrel
Fair enough, I think Trevor feels the same. The blue man can continue, all it takes is a -1 On Apr 27, 2017, at 3:50 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: I don't have any constructive input at all. None of the proposals showed any spark (to me). I hate it when I can't suggest a better path and I hate negat

Re: New logo

2017-04-27 Thread Ted Dunning
I don't have any constructive input at all. None of the proposals showed any spark (to me). I hate it when I can't suggest a better path and I hate negative feedback. But there it is. On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 3:48 PM, Pat Ferrel wrote: > Do you have constructive input (guidance or opinion is w

Re: New logo

2017-04-27 Thread Pat Ferrel
Do you have constructive input (guidance or opinion is welcome input) or would you like to discontinue the contest. If the later, -1 now. On Apr 27, 2017, at 3:42 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: I thought that none of the proposals were worth continuing with. On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 3:36 PM, Pat Fer

Re: New logo

2017-04-27 Thread Ted Dunning
I thought that none of the proposals were worth continuing with. On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 3:36 PM, Pat Ferrel wrote: > Yes, -1 means you hate them all or think the designers are not worth > paying. We have to pay to continue, I’ll foot the bill (donations > appreciated) but don’t want to unles

Re: New logo

2017-04-27 Thread Pat Ferrel
Yes, -1 means you hate them all or think the designers are not worth paying. We have to pay to continue, I’ll foot the bill (donations appreciated) but don’t want to unless people think it will lead to something. For me there are a couple I wouldn’t mind seeing on the web site or swag and yes w

Re: New logo

2017-04-27 Thread Andrew Musselman
I thought we were just voting on continuing this process :) On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 3:22 PM, Trevor Grant wrote: > Also Pat, thank you for organizing. > > +0 > > I don't love any of them enough to +1, I don't hate them all enough to -1 > > Most of them remind me of some spin on Apache Apex, Pyth

Re: New logo

2017-04-27 Thread Trevor Grant
Also Pat, thank you for organizing. +0 I don't love any of them enough to +1, I don't hate them all enough to -1 Most of them remind me of some spin on Apache Apex, Python, Numpy (a Python Library), or IBM's DSX. However, I realize a big part of that is the colors chosen. #143 is my favorite (

Re: New logo

2017-04-27 Thread Andrew Musselman
+1 to continue; thanks for organizing this Pat! My personal favorite is #38 https://images-platform.99static.com/I9quDzcBrtJXg_NMaIsH6ySQ7Ok=/filters:quality(100)/99designs-contests-attachments/84/84017/attachment_84017937 I like the stylized and simple "M" and it reminds me of diagrams showing v

Re: New logo

2017-04-27 Thread Pat Ferrel
We can treat this like a release vote, if anyone hates all these and doesn’t want to continue with shortlisted designers for 3 more days (the next step) vote -1 and say if your vote is binding (your are a PMC member) Otherwise all are welcome to rate everything on the polls below. In this case

Re: New logo

2017-04-27 Thread Pat Ferrel
Here is a second group, hopefully picked to be unique.https://99designs.com/contests/poll/vl7xed We got a lot of responses, these 2 polls contain the best afaict. On Apr 27, 2017, at 11:25 AM, Pat Ferrel wrote: Vote: https://99designs.com/contests/poll/rqcgif We asked for something “mathy” a

New logo

2017-04-27 Thread Pat Ferrel
Vote: https://99designs.com/contests/poll/rqcgif We asked for something “mathy” and asked for no elephant and rider. We have the rest of the week to tweak so leave comments about what you like or would like to change. We don’t have to pick one of these, so if you hate them all, make that known