Daniel Carrera wrote:
Personally I think that Jacqueline should state the reasons for sacking
Ryan. Other project volunteers need to know know what actions can lead
to dismissal. The MarCons would be especially interested.
+1
--Jean
---
Erwin Tenhumberg wrote:
As I said before, the CC was setup to be the mediating body for
community issues including the actions of any project lead.
Yes, I know Louis and Jacqueline are themselves members of the CC,
but the CC has nine members in total. Thus, I will wait for the
outcome of the ne
As I said before, the CC was setup to be the mediating body for
community issues including the actions of any project lead.
Yes, I know Louis and Jacqueline are themselves members of the CC,
but the CC has nine members in total. Thus, I will wait for the
outcome of the next CC meeting.
Erwin
Louis Suarez-Potts wrote:
On 1/2/06 1:03 AM Jean Hollis Weber wrote:
Has a decision been made about whether OOo will have a booth at
SCALE 4x in LA Feb 11-12?
Sort of. AFAIK, there is no money involved from OOo to go there. I
tend to think this conference has wider appeal than the DLS and
Erwin Tenhumberg wrote:
Since I don't know all the details about this incident I will
try to stay neutral by saying that my understanding is that any
elected project lead is empowered to do whatever he or she thinks
is necessary to run the project.
Does that extend to sacking MarCons without gi
Hi
On 1/2/06 1:03 AM Jean Hollis Weber wrote:
> Has a decision been made about whether OOo will have a booth at
> SCALE 4x in LA Feb 11-12?
Sort of. AFAIK, there is no money involved from OOo to go there. I
tend to think this conference has wider appeal than the DLS and is
promising and is no
FYI
Please reply to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list!
Thanks,
Erwin
--- Begin Message ---
Hi all,
As you most likely know, a close to final draft of the call for location
for OOoCon 2006 is available in our Wiki:
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/OOoCon_2006_Call_for_Location
I haven't
Claus Agerskov wrote:
First of all I agree with what Ian Lynch replied.
On Sat, 24 Dec 2005, Jacqueline McNally wrote:
Claus Agerskov wrote:
On Wed, 21 Dec 2005, Jacqueline McNally wrote:
The OpenOffice.org project guidelines suggest communications of
these types of decisi
Dnia 02-01-2006, pon o godzinie 23:38 -0800, Edward Buck napisał(a):
> It seems to me that Microsoft has finally gotten macro viruses under
> control. But is it possible for OOo to claim that it's more secure than
> MS Office? If so, we should be marketing the hell out of that. :-)
> IMO, nothin
Hi,
On 1/3/06 4:31 AM Claus Agerskov wrote:
> First of all I agree with what Ian Lynch replied.
>
Ian asked Laurent, CCR, to send his post to the council, and he did, via
the agenda@ list. [0] Adam Moore also sent a post via Laurent to the
agenda list, as did Jean Weber, regarding more new
Since I don't know all the details about this incident I will
try to stay neutral by saying that my understanding is that any
elected project lead is empowered to do whatever he or she thinks
is necessary to run the project.
In cases of disagreement between different parties, the Community
Counci
11 matches
Mail list logo
