Hi, a marketing campaing by Microsoft has been start showing up
demostrating why Microsoft Office is cheaper why OOo. Is the new 'Get the
FUD' against OOo:
http://blogs.technet.com/ponicke/archive/2006/12/08/microsoft-office-office-sytem-2007-es-mas-barato-que-openoffice-2-03.aspx
On Sat, 20
Here is the OOo version for firefox... I know is smaller but we don't
manage screen real state as good as this guys and quite honestly we are
pretty boring in that regard. OOo should have menu like (we use at OOoES
http://es.openoffice.org/comunidad/) or
http://porting.openoffice.org/mac/
Here is a mockup for FF-to-OOo:
http://www.openoffice-mexico.org/img/ooofirefoxcrosspromotion.png
and
http://www.openoffice-mexico.org/img/ooofirefoxcrosspromotion-original.png
On Sat, 20 Oct 2007 10:46:30 -0500, Sean W. O'Quin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
And we should return the "favor" for
And we should return the "favor" for Firefox during OOo install
-Original Message-
From: RJ Gilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2007 9:51 AM
To: dev@marketing.openoffice.org
Subject: Re: [Marketing] MS Office 2007
Maybe a dialog box with a OOo description and dow
Maybe a dialog box with a OOo description and download
link during Firefox updates...
--- Alexandro Colorado <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Oct 2007 14:23:51 -0500, RJ Gilson
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > Last night I was upgrading to WinAmp 5.5, on the
> > download page I was
Personally, I'd consider PIM and browser essential apps with the OS,
but they don't seem like a natural part of an office suite. One is a
communications toolset, one is a document creation and analysis set...
Of course, it's all semantics. You need both, regardless of how you
divide up what
On Fri, 19 Oct 2007 21:04:00 -0500, andylockran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It's funny that Mozilla should be mentioned in this thread.
I should imagine an inclusion of a PIM & Browser be essential to a
forward-facing office suite.
PIM Browser is already included into most Linux operating sy
