Caio Tiago Oliveira wrote (26-08-10 22:19)
Another interesting news is that OpenSolaris won't get the code from
Oracle in real time.
As the licence allows, Oracle will release a binary with the new
development being closed and releasing the code on CDDL months latter.
That's not desired and
Caio Tiago Oliveira wrote (26-08-10 17:41)
There is an issue with the JCA/SCA. Some people complained when it was
still Sun, but with Oracle it's worse.
Can you pls. tell why it's worse? It is something I missed.
All code contributed to the project is shared with Oracle. Oracle owns
it and
Hi!
I updated the wikipage and put this line.
Who is who: Oracle Experts
http://ui.openoffice.org/VisualDesign/docs/Print/OOoSun_Poster.pdf |
Community members #1
http://ui.openoffice.org/VisualDesign/gifs/Images/NL_L10N_People_Poster_01.pdf
| Community members #2
On 08/26/2010 09:44 PM, Mirek M. wrote:
But it's a good starting point for a new branch.
No. It's not. The changes introduced in that one are introduced by
Microsoft affiliates with a bad history on standards and licensing.
There is a good reason it was forked.
Personally, I would like to
Hi, Russell,
On 08/25/2010 10:59 PM, WorldLabel.com wrote:
Regarding the application Icon, I see one with a TM here and others without:
http://www.openoffice.org/trademark/brandrefresh.html I am not sure but I
think that cannot be tradmarked but would have to be registered?
Pick one that
Cor Nouws, 29-08-2010 05:53:
Caio Tiago Oliveira wrote (26-08-10 17:41)
There is an issue with the JCA/SCA. Some people complained when it was
still Sun, but with Oracle it's worse.
Can you pls. tell why it's worse? It is something I missed.
Sun opened Solaris development, Oracle is
Caio Tiago Oliveira wrote (29-08-10 18:37)
Cor Nouws, 29-08-2010 05:53:
Caio Tiago Oliveira wrote (26-08-10 17:41)
There is an issue with the JCA/SCA. Some people complained when it was
still Sun, but with Oracle it's worse.
Can you pls. tell why it's worse? It is something I missed.
Sun
