Le 17.12.2008 10:24, Vikram Gaur a écrit :
Web version has limited future because of bandwidth. Google will take
care of that.
Still if we want to compete with that we can convert openoffice.org to
web version.
Hi all,
We had such kind of applications in France in the seventies with
Minite
FYI, here's my (detailed) take on the issue:
http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/2008/12/17/some-thoughts-on-the-microsofts-implementation-of-odf/
Cheers,
Charles.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@marketing.openo
On Wed, 2008-12-17 at 10:02 +, Richard Rothwell wrote:
> 2008/12/17 Ian Lynch :
> > On Wed, 2008-12-17 at 14:54 +0530, Vikram Gaur wrote:
> >> Web version has limited future because of bandwidth. Google will take
> >> care of that.
> >
> > That is like saying MS will take care of the desktop fo
Or like what the o...@www project is doing?
http://odf-at-www.openoffice.org/
John
--
John McCreesh
Marketing Project Lead
OpenOffice.org
On Wed, December 17, 2008 10:15, Vikram Gaur wrote:
> That will not be an issue if we decide to do.
>
> On Wed, 2008-12-17 at 10:02 +, Richard Rothwell w
That will not be an issue if we decide to do.
On Wed, 2008-12-17 at 10:02 +, Richard Rothwell wrote:
> 2008/12/17 Ian Lynch :
> > On Wed, 2008-12-17 at 14:54 +0530, Vikram Gaur wrote:
> >> Web version has limited future because of bandwidth. Google will take
> >> care of that.
> >
> > That is
2008/12/17 Ian Lynch :
> On Wed, 2008-12-17 at 14:54 +0530, Vikram Gaur wrote:
>> Web version has limited future because of bandwidth. Google will take
>> care of that.
>
> That is like saying MS will take care of the desktop for us!
>
> At the moment there are bandwidth limitations but they will g
On Wed, 2008-12-17 at 14:54 +0530, Vikram Gaur wrote:
> Web version has limited future because of bandwidth. Google will take
> care of that.
That is like saying MS will take care of the desktop for us!
At the moment there are bandwidth limitations but they will gradually
ease and those that go i
Vikram Gaur wrote:
> We should not consider what microsoft says.
> Openoffice.org is certainly a better option now.
Especially in regards to the loads of legacy formats that are now
blocked by MSO.
On Wed, 2008-12-17 at 09:27 +0100, Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
> We ought to be more cunning here. As
Web version has limited future because of bandwidth. Google will take
care of that.
Still if we want to compete with that we can convert openoffice.org to
web version.
On Wed, 2008-12-17 at 09:20 +, Ian Lynch wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-12-17 at 14:11 +0530, Vikram Gaur wrote:
> > We should not co
On Wed, 2008-12-17 at 14:11 +0530, Vikram Gaur wrote:
> We should not consider what microsoft says.
> Openoffice.org is certainly a better option now.
The question is how to get all those MS Office users to know about it.
As MS is about to launch a web version of MS Office what have we got to
comp
We should not consider what microsoft says.
Openoffice.org is certainly a better option now.
On Wed, 2008-12-17 at 09:27 +0100, Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> Le 16/12/08 19:43, Lars Noodén a écrit :
> > John McCreesh wrote:
> >
> >> "Microsoft wants the world to believe that in t
Hello,
Le 16/12/08 19:43, Lars Noodén a écrit :
John McCreesh wrote:
"Microsoft wants the world to believe that in these enlightened days it
operates an open Office policy to all comers... sort of.
Ouch. The "sort of" part there refers to the DRM'd, MS-only, clunky PDF
imitation X
John McCreesh wrote:
> "Microsoft wants the world to believe that in these enlightened days it
> operates an open Office policy to all comers... sort of.
Ouch. The "sort of" part there refers to the DRM'd, MS-only, clunky PDF
imitation XFS. It looks like MS will try to piggyback an attack on
Ado
"Microsoft wants the world to believe that in these enlightened days it
operates an open Office policy to all comers... sort of.
"And thats why its decided to publish documentation that details its
implementation of OASIS Open Document Format (ODF) version 1.1 support in
MS Office 2007 Service P
14 matches
Mail list logo
