Hi all,
We just finished the meeting, here are some notes and next steps:
- There were 6 persons in the meeting
- We all agree Marvin scope should be simplified, we want to give more
focus on things Marvin is already doing well and there are no similar
solutions in the community
- We want to
+1
Em sex., 5 de nov. de 2021 às 14:16, Zhang Yifei
escreveu:
> +1
>
> Em sex., 5 de nov. de 2021 às 08:25, Mario de Sá Vera
> escreveu:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Em qui., 4 de nov. de 2021 às 21:03, Lucas Bonatto Miguel <
> > lucasb...@apache.org> escreveu:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > As the current
+1
Em sex., 5 de nov. de 2021 às 08:25, Mario de Sá Vera
escreveu:
> +1
>
> Em qui., 4 de nov. de 2021 às 21:03, Lucas Bonatto Miguel <
> lucasb...@apache.org> escreveu:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > As the current version of Marvin is not getting enough traction in both
> > usage and development, some
+1
Em qui., 4 de nov. de 2021 às 21:03, Lucas Bonatto Miguel <
lucasb...@apache.org> escreveu:
> Hi,
>
> As the current version of Marvin is not getting enough traction in both
> usage and development, some action needs to be taken. After discussing with
> a few stakeholders, we believe that the
+1 I think it's a good plan to discuss these changes.
On Thu, Nov 4, 2021 at 6:03 PM Lucas Bonatto Miguel
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As the current version of Marvin is not getting enough traction in both
> usage and development, some action needs to be taken. After discussing with
> a few stakeholders,
Hi,
As the current version of Marvin is not getting enough traction in both
usage and development, some action needs to be taken. After discussing with
a few stakeholders, we believe that the scope of the problem Marvin is
trying to solve should be simplified. One of the ideas that I would like