Re: [Proposal] Documenting Maven

2006-06-15 Thread Edwin Punzalan
Definitely deserves +1 However, I'm still torn between using apt and a wiki site but whichever wins I think the obvious casualty will be the site-plugin. If we continue on using the pages generated by the site plugin, and based from John Casey's "Core Documentation" point #2, it will be a m

[jira] Subscription: Design & Best Practices

2006-06-15 Thread jira
Issue Subscription Filter: Design & Best Practices (34 issues) Subscriber: mavendevlist Key Summary MNG-612 implement conflict resolution techniques http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-612 MNG-1508Need a process-test-classes phase http://jira.codehaus.org/b

Re: Rights for JIRA

2006-06-15 Thread Fabrice Bellingard
Thx Brett :o) On 6/16/06, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: done Fabrice Bellingard wrote: > Hi guys, > > I've just figured out that I can't edit JIRA issues for Maven projects > (only > for the MOJO project). Can someone give me the rights to edit JIRA issues > please? > > Thx in advanc

Re: Rights for JIRA

2006-06-15 Thread Brett Porter
done Fabrice Bellingard wrote: Hi guys, I've just figured out that I can't edit JIRA issues for Maven projects (only for the MOJO project). Can someone give me the rights to edit JIRA issues please? Thx in advance! Cheers, Fabrice. -- Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Apache Maven - http:

Rights for JIRA

2006-06-15 Thread Fabrice Bellingard
Hi guys, I've just figured out that I can't edit JIRA issues for Maven projects (only for the MOJO project). Can someone give me the rights to edit JIRA issues please? Thx in advance! Cheers, Fabrice.

Re: [VOTE] Release maven-project-info-reports-plugin 2.0.1

2006-06-15 Thread Brett Porter
+1 Carlos Sanchez wrote: I'd like to release the 2.0.1 with only one bug fix, http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPIR-2 I know there are some pending issues but until somebody has time to go for them releasing 2.0.1 will help avoid the innumerable times people had reported this bug. -- Brett P

Re: [vote] Release all wagons (was Re: [vote] Release wagon-webdav 1.0-beta-1)

2006-06-15 Thread Brett Porter
+1 Emmanuel Venisse wrote: I'd prefer to release all wagons. We have actually three open issues that will be fixed in beta-2 Emmanuel Emmanuel Venisse a écrit : hi, wagon-webdav providers works fine and it is required for some release of mojo and plexus projects. here my +1 Emmanuel -

Re: [vote] Release all wagons (was Re: [vote] Release wagon-webdav 1.0-beta-1)

2006-06-15 Thread Carlos Sanchez
+1 On 6/15/06, Emmanuel Venisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'd prefer to release all wagons. We have actually three open issues that will be fixed in beta-2 Emmanuel Emmanuel Venisse a écrit : > hi, > > wagon-webdav providers works fine and it is required for some release of > mojo and plexus

Re: [vote] Release all wagons (was Re: [vote] Release wagon-webdav 1.0-beta-1)

2006-06-15 Thread Vincent Siveton
+1 Vincent 2006/6/15, Emmanuel Venisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: I'd prefer to release all wagons. We have actually three open issues that will be fixed in beta-2 Emmanuel Emmanuel Venisse a écrit : > hi, > > wagon-webdav providers works fine and it is required for some release of > mojo and plex

Re: [VOTE] Release maven-project-info-reports-plugin 2.0.1

2006-06-15 Thread Vincent Siveton
+1 Vincent 2006/6/15, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: I'd like to release the 2.0.1 with only one bug fix, http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPIR-2 I know there are some pending issues but until somebody has time to go for them releasing 2.0.1 will help avoid the innumerable times people had

RE: [VOTE] Release maven-project-info-reports-plugin 2.0.1

2006-06-15 Thread Mike Perham
+1 Sounds reasonable. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Carlos Sanchez > Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2006 3:42 PM > To: Maven Developers List > Subject: [VOTE] Release maven-project-info-reports-plugin 2.0.1 > > I'd like to release the

Re: [VOTE] Release maven-project-info-reports-plugin 2.0.1

2006-06-15 Thread Emmanuel Venisse
+1 Emmanuel Carlos Sanchez a écrit : I'd like to release the 2.0.1 with only one bug fix, http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPIR-2 I know there are some pending issues but until somebody has time to go for them releasing 2.0.1 will help avoid the innumerable times people had reported this bug.

[VOTE] Release maven-project-info-reports-plugin 2.0.1

2006-06-15 Thread Carlos Sanchez
I'd like to release the 2.0.1 with only one bug fix, http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPIR-2 I know there are some pending issues but until somebody has time to go for them releasing 2.0.1 will help avoid the innumerable times people had reported this bug. -- I could give you my word as a Spaniar

RE: [vote] Release all wagons (was Re: [vote] Release wagon-webdav 1.0-beta-1)

2006-06-15 Thread Mike Perham
+1 > -Original Message- > From: Emmanuel Venisse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2006 2:51 PM > To: Maven Developers List > Subject: Re: [vote] Release all wagons (was Re: [vote] > Release wagon-webdav 1.0-beta-1) > > we want to keep them all in the same version (a

Re: [vote] Release all wagons (was Re: [vote] Release wagon-webdav 1.0-beta-1)

2006-06-15 Thread Emmanuel Venisse
we want to keep them all in the same version (at least for now) so it's more easy to update them in projects that use them. Emmanuel Mike Perham a écrit : Can you summarize why? Do they all have outstanding fixes deserving of a release? Or are you just keeping them all versioned with the sa

Snapshot of maven-changes-plugin?

2006-06-15 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
Hi, is there a snapshot of the maven-changes-plugin available somewhere? I would like to do a release Apache XML-RPC, where I am using this snapshot to generate the site. Obviously, this only makes sense, if someone else is able to rebuild the site without too many hazzle. If not: Could someone

Re: [vote] Release all wagons (was Re: [vote] Release wagon-webdav 1.0-beta-1)

2006-06-15 Thread Arnaud HERITIER
+1 In the m1 artifact plugin we are using beta 6 or 7 versions. If there are some interesting fixes in wagon since theses releases it could be useful for use to release a new version of the artifact plugin to bundle it in m1 beta 3. Arnaud On 6/15/06, Mike Perham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Can

RE: [vote] Release all wagons (was Re: [vote] Release wagon-webdav 1.0-beta-1)

2006-06-15 Thread Mike Perham
Can you summarize why? Do they all have outstanding fixes deserving of a release? Or are you just keeping them all versioned with the same version (1.0-beta-1)? > -Original Message- > From: Emmanuel Venisse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2006 9:22 AM > To: Maven D

Re: [vote] Release all wagons (was Re: [vote] Release wagon-webdav 1.0-beta-1)

2006-06-15 Thread jerome lacoste
On 6/15/06, Emmanuel Venisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'd prefer to release all wagons. We have actually three open issues that will be fixed in beta-2 +1 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands,

[vote] Release all wagons (was Re: [vote] Release wagon-webdav 1.0-beta-1)

2006-06-15 Thread Emmanuel Venisse
I'd prefer to release all wagons. We have actually three open issues that will be fixed in beta-2 Emmanuel Emmanuel Venisse a écrit : hi, wagon-webdav providers works fine and it is required for some release of mojo and plexus projects. here my +1 Emmanuel --

Re: [vote] Release wagon-webdav 1.0-beta-1

2006-06-15 Thread Mark Hobson
+1 Been using it internally since it appeared. Mark On 15/06/06, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: +1 On 6/15/06, Emmanuel Venisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hi, > > wagon-webdav providers works fine and it is required for some release of mojo and plexus projects. > > here my +1 >

Re: [vote] Release wagon-webdav 1.0-beta-1

2006-06-15 Thread jerome lacoste
On 6/15/06, Emmanuel Venisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hi, > > wagon-webdav providers works fine and it is required for some release of mojo and plexus projects. > > here my +1 +1 Won't you release the full wagon-providers module? Jerome ---

Re: [vote] Release wagon-webdav 1.0-beta-1

2006-06-15 Thread Carlos Sanchez
+1 On 6/15/06, Emmanuel Venisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: hi, wagon-webdav providers works fine and it is required for some release of mojo and plexus projects. here my +1 Emmanuel - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECT

Re: [vote] Release wagon-webdav 1.0-beta-1

2006-06-15 Thread Milos Kleint
+1 managed to deploy the site for mevenide2 easily. Milos On 6/15/06, Emmanuel Venisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: hi, wagon-webdav providers works fine and it is required for some release of mojo and plexus projects. here my +1 Emmanuel

[vote] Release wagon-webdav 1.0-beta-1

2006-06-15 Thread Emmanuel Venisse
hi, wagon-webdav providers works fine and it is required for some release of mojo and plexus projects. here my +1 Emmanuel - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Proposal] Documenting Maven

2006-06-15 Thread jerome lacoste
On 6/15/06, John Casey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi everyone, I know we've talked about this quite a bit already. Actually, I'm having trouble finding the past threads on this topic in my email...can someone who knows please link them in? Basically, I've talked to Brett, Jason, and a few other

Re: [Proposal] Documenting Maven

2006-06-15 Thread John Casey
[SNIP] It will come as no surprise that I think you should encourage more user-contributed documentation. (Aside from submitting patches for the apt source-- that's too high a barrier if you just want to share a plugin configuration example that works for you.) Agreed. I'd like to see if we

Re: [Proposal] Documenting Maven

2006-06-15 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 6/14/06, John Casey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Basically, I've talked to Brett, Jason, and a few other Maven developers, and I think it's time we started making website documentation a top priority for Maven. General thoughts -- I never navigate the Maven site, I go straight to Google. (So

Re: [Proposal] Documenting Maven

2006-06-15 Thread Raphaël Piéroni
Hi John, Here are inlined some propositions. 2006/6/15, John Casey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Hi everyone, [SNIP] I've put my ideas here: http://www.commonjava.org/~jdcasey/maven-documentation-proposal.html I apologize if it looks like I ripped off someone else's ideas...I honestly cannot fin

test

2006-06-15 Thread Jason van Zyl
Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

source:jar-with-dependencies?

2006-06-15 Thread Ovidio Mallo
Hi, a few days ago I have posted a request on the Maven user list for some way to create a source bundle for an artifact which not only includes the artifact's source (as produced by source:jar) but also the sources of its transitive dependencies. I was told that the closest approach to this is u

Maven 1.0.2 on z/OS

2006-06-15 Thread Anuradha Weeraman
Hi, When I run maven 1.0.2 under USS and I'm encountering a character set conversion issue. It outputs some gibberish which when you convert from ISO8859-1 to IBM-1047 appears to be environment variables. From what I gather, this happens when you use in maven.xml. It seems that maven expects the

Re: suggestions for handling native libraries

2006-06-15 Thread Richard van der Hoff
Hi Dan, dan tran wrote: Hi Richard, The native-maven-plugin JNI example shows that you can have your native project depends on a java jar project that has java jni interfaces. This way you can use native plugin to generate jni native include files before building the native artifacts. This is

Re: Fw: [plexus-dev] Plexus Website

2006-06-15 Thread Rinku
Yep, I am on that task to get them organized and published. Cheers, Rahul - Original Message - From: "Brett Porter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Maven Developers List" Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2006 6:09 PM Subject: Re: Fw: [plexus-dev] Plexus Website That's a good idea too :) I was ac