I have the same isssue. You need to write a Mock object for the
project and specify the implementation in your config. See confluence
for more details (and the javadoc plugin as Vincent S. suggested
yesterday).
Let's discuss this here because it seems I'll came accross the same
issues soon :)
Ch
On 12 Sep 06, at 4:17 AM 12 Sep 06, Brian E. Fox wrote:
Must have been a psychic connection here. I finally started working on
this tonight and have resolved many issues before seeing this email. I
have also finally been using 2.0 in production with no problems...it's
at least as stable as 1.0 f
I think you may be right about a shared component. Most of the
refactoring from 1.0 to 2.0 has been around cleaning up the plugin and
creating some more generic objects to allow better code reuse and
paramater consistency among the various mojos in this plugin. My main
concern right now is to get s
You now have the validation in there twice - it should be removed
from execute() shouldn't it?
I think I'd construct the cron expression using a method as needed
rather than sticking it in a field, too.
What do you think?
On 13/09/2006, at 8:11 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: oching
+1 to release a beta
then
+1 componentize it
On 9/13/06, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think you may be right about a shared component. Most of the
refactoring from 1.0 to 2.0 has been around cleaning up the plugin and
creating some more generic objects to allow better code reuse
Now that we have the sandbox open to anyone, should we do this?
On 10/08/2006, at 3:02 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
I guess we don't have any jdeveloper users out there. Should we
bring it into the Maven sandbox as something available for
interested parties to pick up and run with if they later c
Hi everybody,
I'm starting to write the provider for Synergy CM, and the first
(expected) problem is how to deal with Synergy tasks. This is a notion
you can't find in CVS/SVN, but it's very important for Synergy users.
I'm a newbie in Synergy, but here is a typical usecase I understood:
1) y
ok, after a couple of hectic days working on plexus-security and
archiva in tandem joakim and I ironed out the remaining issue that we
know of dealing with login issues and a host of other weird
strangeness that was cropping up.
The root cause was plexus security ui actions were not getting set a
We are currently testing maven2 with jdeveloper and if we are happy, we definitely will start using
that a whole lot :)
Although I approach this more from the maven site, it would definitely be a benefit to work on the
plugin (assuming it needs work that is :)
Mvgr,
Martin
Brett Porter wrote:
Ok guys, It's for me !
I'm going back to the bed ;-)
I didn't noticed that we find with mvnrepository POMs used for relocation
like for acegi.
For the 2 others, I don't understand how I found these versions ..
Thanks
Arnaud
On 9/13/06, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 9/12/06,
Hi All
Only just joined the list and I was just reading the recent posts on
Serena PVCS support. It looks like work is well on the way on this and
there is also some potential code from Serena if they can resolve their
partner issues. Good news.
I am personally interested in a provider for Ser
Hi Steve,
Welcome! It seems Australia is a hotbed of PVCS users :)
The current status seems to be that Peter Ineson is looking into it -
hopefully he'll chime in shortly.
Since we're all on the same timezone we might be able to catch up and
figure out where to go next. Would be great to se
Hi,
I am trying to find the surefire repository at
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/surefire/trunk/surefire
and wanted to ask, if anonymous project access is disabled.
Best regards
Johannes
Yes, I agree. I think its better to have the cron expression constructed
using a method.
Sorry about the validation, I forgot to remove it from execute().
Brett Porter wrote:
You now have the validation in there twice - it should be removed
from execute() shouldn't it?
I think I'd construc
I'm using the project stub in the testing-harness project. I'm curious
about the decision to default all collections to return strings:
public Set getArtifacts()
{
return Collections.singleton( "" );
}
Wouldn't it make more sense to return an empty set than a set with a
stri
Yes, I think it is incorrect.
On 14/09/2006, at 12:49 PM, Brian E. Fox wrote:
I'm using the project stub in the testing-harness project. I'm curious
about the decision to default all collections to return strings:
public Set getArtifacts()
{
return Collections.singleton( "" );
I was thinking about extending the harness to read in the dependencies
and update the project stub to populate the getDependencyArtifacts()
results with those values. I then started thinking that the next thing
I'll need is to populate getArtifacts() with some pretend transitive
dependencies.
Is
17 matches
Mail list logo
