Whatever tool you are using for this is not setting a resolution when
you close it (which is impossible from the web UI).
- Brett
On 08/06/2007, at 2:01 PM, Jason van Zyl (JIRA) wrote:
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPA-51?
page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-t
On 8 Jun 07, at 12:37 AM 8 Jun 07, Brett Porter wrote:
Why don't we just use the "in progress" flag in jira?
We certainly can but this provides another set of more detailed
information where the description just transitions to a feature
summary. No one will see it in JIRA. Especially uns
Why don't we just use the "in progress" flag in jira?
- Brett
On 08/06/2007, at 2:19 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
Hi,
Just trying to keep track of work in progress so people can see
what's going on. Currently I'm working with Eric the work he and
Kenney did to support 1.5 annotations for Plug
Hi,
Just trying to keep track of work in progress so people can see
what's going on. Currently I'm working with Eric the work he and
Kenney did to support 1.5 annotations for Plugins:
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVEN/Work+In+Progress
It's not documented but I think as part of the dev
On 08/06/2007, at 3:55 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
On 7 Jun 07, at 1:45 PM 7 Jun 07, Brett Porter wrote:
+1, I was almost going to jfdi this afternoon when I was looking
at that JIRA.
You said in the issue you didn't want it created so I waited.
That was in March last year, though :) Giv
For anyone who wants to know what's happening in 2.1 and what
features have been implemented already you can take a look here:
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVEN/New+Feature+Summaries
We're trying to ease off completely on adding things until we sort
some issues out but for what's been d
Unless anyone has any reservations I'm going to stage 2.0.7.
Thanks,
Jason
--
Jason van Zyl
Founder and PMC Chair, Apache Maven
jason at sonatype dot com
--
--
Was this fixed, or won't fix? I couldn't really tell from your
statement, and there's no version.
On 08/06/2007, at 5:54 AM, John Casey (JIRA) wrote:
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2577?
page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
John Casey closed MNG-
Issue Subscription
Filter: Design & Best Practices (32 issues)
Subscriber: mavendevlist
Key Summary
MNG-2184Possible problem with @aggregator and forked lifecycles
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2184
MNG-612 implement conflict resolution techniques
htt
Hi,
I've written something here:
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVEN/Maven+2.1+Artifact+Resolution+Specification
The title of the document does not match the first chapter, which is
'Dependency Conflict Resolution',
as that's what I'm talking about in that page. I think artifact resolution
On 7 Jun 07, at 4:28 PM 7 Jun 07, John Casey wrote:
Sorry, I'm not really following.
I understand that this is about integration-testing for Maven itself
That's all I was making clear.
-john
On Jun 7, 2007, at 3:36 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
On 7 Jun 07, at 3:00 PM 7 Jun 07, John Casey w
Sorry, I'm not really following.
I understand that this is about integration-testing for Maven itself,
but IMO the best way to integration-test any Maven system - be it the
core or a plugin - is to create a series of builds that use the
feature under test. Therefore, core integration-tests
Hi,
I've got some plugins, which currently do have static dependencies:
The maven-jaxme-plugin, the Axis 2 plugins, the rat-maven-plugin, and
some inhouse plugins at my employers site. I've always disliked these
static dependencies and recently I have written some code for an
inhouse project that
You want to work through some of these issues as I'm going to stage
2.0.7 today and there's a couple things I need to fix up.
On 4 Jun 07, at 1:22 PM 4 Jun 07, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
Hi
I've tried to get the maven-stage-plugin working. Currently the -
DrepositoryId parameter is not working,
On 7 Jun 07, at 3:00 PM 7 Jun 07, John Casey wrote:
I'll take the integration-testing tasks. Kenney and I have talked a
bit about some of this stuff, so it'd be a natural extension to
those discussions.
These are specifically out integration tests for Maven itself, not
the plugin integ
I'll take the integration-testing tasks. Kenney and I have talked a
bit about some of this stuff, so it'd be a natural extension to those
discussions.
-john
On Jun 6, 2007, at 10:56 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
Ok, I pushed all these into the MPA JIRA:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavi
On 7 Jun 07, at 1:45 PM 7 Jun 07, Brett Porter wrote:
+1, I was almost going to jfdi this afternoon when I was looking at
that JIRA.
You said in the issue you didn't want it created so I waited.
Only caveat: I don't want to instantly move all the MNG
documentation issues over there. Sti
+1, I was almost going to jfdi this afternoon when I was looking at
that JIRA.
Only caveat: I don't want to instantly move all the MNG documentation
issues over there. Still believe site != documentation, and for
versioned documentation it probably still belongs in the original JIRA.
(I'm
Jason van Zyl wrote:
I have built a snapshot for 2.0.7 and put it here:
http://people.apache.org/~jvanzyl/
I figure are going to try and squeeze in more issues so what I plan is
let people state their case and I'll slot those into 2.0.8 and push
back whatever I can into 2.0.7 but I would like
+1
On 07/06/07, Andrew Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yeah, sounds like a plan
On 7 Jun 2007, at 14:59, Brian E. Fox wrote:
> +1
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2007 4:41 AM
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: M
Yeah, sounds like a plan
On 7 Jun 2007, at 14:59, Brian E. Fox wrote:
+1
-Original Message-
From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2007 4:41 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Maven Project Website JIRA
For folks like myself, Eric, Tim and Brett who
+1
On 6/7/07, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1
-Original Message-
From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2007 4:41 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Maven Project Website JIRA
For folks like myself, Eric, Tim and Brett who are looking at
c
+1
-Original Message-
From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2007 4:41 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Maven Project Website JIRA
For folks like myself, Eric, Tim and Brett who are looking at
cleaning up the website and integration with the wiki I
On 07/06/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Not in the long run :-) The ROI for a MAC is 10 minutes if you
consider the mental health costs.
I don't disagree, just that the bank manager says no.. :(
Mark
-
To unsubs
On 6/7/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Not in the long run :-) The ROI for a MAC is 10 minutes if you
consider the mental health costs.
+1 ;-)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
On 7 Jun 07, at 9:31 AM 7 Jun 07, Mark Hobson wrote:
On 07/06/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As in the next few hours, and you're reasonably sure it's all good? I
do the ITs and about 20 projects and feedback from another 20 or so
projects so if you're happy with this stuff then
On 07/06/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As in the next few hours, and you're reasonably sure it's all good? I
do the ITs and about 20 projects and feedback from another 20 or so
projects so if you're happy with this stuff then I'll start up
another cycle.
As far as I can tell it's
On 7 Jun 07, at 8:51 AM 7 Jun 07, Mark Hobson wrote:
Hi Jason,
On 07/06/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Patrick how are you making out with MNG-2289?
And Mark and Brett, how are you making out with MNG-2988?
Brett's applied and closed MNG-2988. MNG-3039 needs to be applied
be
Hi Jason,
On 07/06/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Patrick how are you making out with MNG-2289?
And Mark and Brett, how are you making out with MNG-2988?
Brett's applied and closed MNG-2988. MNG-3039 needs to be applied
before another 2.0.7 release is staged.
I'm going to try
Hi,
Patrick how are you making out with MNG-2289?
And Mark and Brett, how are you making out with MNG-2988?
I'm going to try and sort out the build at Sun today and by the end
of the day stage the release and put it up for a vote.
Thanks,
Jason
---
On 7 Jun 07, at 8:01 AM 7 Jun 07, Kenney Westerhof wrote:
I wanted to get some feedback first, flesh it out on the dev list
and then
jot it down. Need some feedback as to how it's supposed to work now
and what we want.
As long as you keep track of it that's fine. Eventually shove it here:
I wanted to get some feedback first, flesh it out on the dev list and then
jot it down. Need some feedback as to how it's supposed to work now
and what we want.
If there's no response within a reasonable amount of time I'll just put
it in the wiki.
Thanks,
Kenney
Jason van Zyl wrote:
For the
On 07/06/2007, at 7:46 PM, Mark Hobson wrote:
+//suite.addTestSuite
( MavenIT0121TransitiveDepManVersion.class ); -- MNG-2998
Should this not be MNG-3038?
Just testing ;) Fixed.
Thanks
- Brett
-
To unsubscribe, e
For folks like myself, Eric, Tim and Brett who are looking at
cleaning up the website and integration with the wiki I think it
would be a good idea to create the JIRA project for now. There is
really no place for users to raise complaints about the organization
of the site and anything we h
Erik Bengtson wrote:
Quoting David Goemans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
@ Erik Bengtson
I see one problem in your JPOX implementation? How do you validate pwds?
The problem is that there are many different algorithms like (md5, crypt
etc). I solved it by validating on LDAP.
In the ldap query
On 6 Jun 07, at 11:28 PM 6 Jun 07, Brett Porter wrote:
On 07/06/2007, at 12:09 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
- we will have to retain runtime compatibility in 2.1, but not
necessarily API compatibility which is fine
For plugins yes, for sanity. Not any other APIs. Plugins using
older artifac
On 6 Jun 07, at 4:25 PM 6 Jun 07, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
Hi
I've spent the day learning the ins and outs of swizzle. It's
really an awesome tool for aggregating data from JIRA. There are
some hoops you need to jump through to get what you want, but the
results are exciting.
David Ble
For the love of god put this in the wiki. Use it as the start of the
spec.
On 6 Jun 07, at 9:46 PM 6 Jun 07, Kenney Westerhof wrote:
I think it's a matter of scope and ordering.
Some brainstorming on specifying this out to the letter:
> > > | A -> B -> C -> D
> > > |
> > > | C depends on
On 6 Jun 07, at 11:15 PM 6 Jun 07, Brett Porter wrote:
On 07/06/2007, at 1:02 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
On 6/6/07, John Casey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Since this is not urgent, as you mentioned, we can afford to wait
until a time when we don't have two active branches in development
that s
On 07/06/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Author: brett
Date: Thu Jun 7 02:29:21 2007
New Revision: 545125
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=545125
Log:
[MNG-3023] apply integration test for issue (not yet fixed)
[snip]
Modified:
maven/core-integration-testing/t
On 01/06/07, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Mark,
Sure, jump on in your morning (or grab me on google talk, yahoo,
skype :). I'll still be here. Emmanuel should be around then too, and
he's done the most work on the release plugin recently.
We can post back with what we figure out..
41 matches
Mail list logo
