Re: What is Archiva.NEXT ?

2007-07-30 Thread Joakim Erdfelt
I'm tired. I'm tired of the confusion. I'm tired of the lack of decision. The ability to serve the repository information to multiple clients is exactly the reason for splitting this logic out. It's nearly impossible to have dynamic paths to resources and be a managed repository at the same

Re: What is Archiva.NEXT ?

2007-07-30 Thread Brett Porter
On 31/07/2007, at 12:43 PM, Joakim Erdfelt wrote: I'm tired. I'm tired of the confusion. I'm tired of the lack of decision. k, I have a proposal at the end, just working through the details. The ability to serve the repository information to multiple clients is exactly the reason for

Re: JUnit tests in intellij

2007-07-30 Thread Erik Drolshammer
LAMY Olivier wrote: I don't know how does it work on IntelliJ but on eclipse I had in my junit configuration this directory continuum-model/target/classes in the junit classpath. This directory includes META-INF/package.jdo. Didn't work unfortunately. Any other tips? Is anyone using

Re: some issues for rescheduling?

2007-07-30 Thread Brett Porter
Anyone have any thoughts on these, or should I just go ahead and make the changes? (Sorry Emmanuel, I know you've been offline a bit recently :) Cheers, Brett On 25/07/2007, at 5:13 PM, Emmanuel Venisse wrote: Thanks Brett, I'll review them. Emmanuel Brett Porter a écrit : Hi, I took a

Re: Design thoughts

2007-07-30 Thread Vincent Siveton
Hi, 2007/7/30, Dennis Lundberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Brett Porter wrote: I haven't been keeping track unfortunately, so maybe I'm missing a piece of the puzzle. How does a 'Markup' relate to a 'Parser', which is what I thought the terminology was for this? The Markup classes contain

Status of maven-scm-client

2007-07-30 Thread Gilles Scokart
When browsing the source of maven-scm, I found maven-scm-client. What's its status? What was the intention? I thought the goal was to have a unique command line working for any kind of providers. But the implemention is rather limited compared the the actual scm API, and seemed to not have

Re: Support for Merant ChangeMan Dimension

2007-07-30 Thread Gilles Scokart
FYI, I didn't manage to reach Jeroen. Gilles Gilles Scokart wrote: What's the status of the Dimension support? I saw an issue SCM-34, but this one is related to Merant PVCS, which is a totally different tool than Merant ChangeMan Dimension. I also saw in [1] that Jeroen Leenarts has

Re: JRE version for providers

2007-07-30 Thread Mike Perham
From http://maven.apache.org/download.html: JDK 1.4 or above (this is to execute Maven - it still allows you to build against 1.3 and prior JDK's) On 7/30/07, Gilles Scokart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What is the JRE that the providers should assume?

Re: Severe assembly plugin problem

2007-07-30 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 30 Jul 07, at 12:27 AM 30 Jul 07, John Casey wrote: I've added code in 2.2-beta-2-snap to address this problem...at least, it should address it. I added resolution to the plugin before 2.2-beta-1 because there were issues when people wanted to create an assembly that didn't require

Releases

2007-07-30 Thread Jason van Zyl
Just a heads up that I'm about to make a series of releases to try and make it possible to vote on and release Maven 2.1-alpha-1. I've fixed a critical flaw in Classworlds, the single plexus JAR is back and I'll release that, Modello (using plexus), plexus-utils (with encoding fixes by

Advice on defining an scm url format for dimension

2007-07-30 Thread Gilles Scokart
I started to experiment on the implementation of a dimension provider. And now, the question arrives. My first problem is about the scm url. To connect to a dimension server, my tool will need : 1. dimension user name 2. dimension password 3. hostname, 4. dbname, 5. datasourcename, 6. dbuser,

Re: Releases

2007-07-30 Thread Arnaud HERITIER
... Vincent/Dennis, if you guys are working on Doxia I will let you know when I push out the plexus release. If you can try it with the single plexus JAR then that should remove many of the problems you've seen and should facilitate the release of the site plugin. Hey Jason , You forgot that

Re: Releases

2007-07-30 Thread Stephane Nicoll
Please release doxia, the changes plugins is buggy and we can't update because of a doxia release missing. Thanks, Stéphane On 7/30/07, Arnaud HERITIER [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... Vincent/Dennis, if you guys are working on Doxia I will let you know when I push out the plexus release. If

JRE version for providers

2007-07-30 Thread Gilles Scokart
What is the JRE that the providers should assume? -- Gilles SCOKART

Re: Releases

2007-07-30 Thread Dan Tran
Please apply http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/PLXUTILS-34 This issue is preventing us from using the latest plexus-util on system without bash shell ( like AIX). Thanks -D On 7/30/07, Stephane Nicoll [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please release doxia, the changes plugins is buggy and we can't

Re: Releases

2007-07-30 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 30 Jul 07, at 10:06 AM 30 Jul 07, Dan Tran wrote: Please apply http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/PLXUTILS-34 This issue is preventing us from using the latest plexus-util on system without bash shell ( like AIX). To late for this cycle, but I'll be cutting releases every week for

Re: Releases

2007-07-30 Thread Vincent Siveton
Hi Jason, 2007/7/30, Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Just a heads up that I'm about to make a series of releases to try and make it possible to vote on and release Maven 2.1-alpha-1. I've fixed a critical flaw in Classworlds, the single plexus JAR is back and I'll release that, Modello

Re: Design thoughts

2007-07-30 Thread Vincent Siveton
Hi Jason, 2007/7/30, Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On 30 Jul 07, at 5:06 AM 30 Jul 07, Dennis Lundberg wrote: Brett Porter wrote: I haven't been keeping track unfortunately, so maybe I'm missing a piece of the puzzle. How does a 'Markup' relate to a 'Parser', which is what I thought

Plugin development: how to get the phase

2007-07-30 Thread John Petritis
I need to be able to get the phase my plugin is run in. I will probably make it run in multiple phases. I would prefer to get the phase from an @parameter expression=${???} But I cannot figure out what variable name to use in it. (I am basically trying to make a logger that tracks when maven

Re: Releases

2007-07-30 Thread Jason van Zyl
I've already bumped everything to 1.4.5 which I will release first. Everything uses the new plexus I'm about to release which also uses the new release of plexus-utils. On 30 Jul 07, at 12:37 PM 30 Jul 07, Vincent Siveton wrote: Hi Jason, 2007/7/30, Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Just

Re: Design thoughts

2007-07-30 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 30 Jul 07, at 12:41 PM 30 Jul 07, Vincent Siveton wrote: Hi Jason, 2007/7/30, Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On 30 Jul 07, at 5:06 AM 30 Jul 07, Dennis Lundberg wrote: Brett Porter wrote: I haven't been keeping track unfortunately, so maybe I'm missing a piece of the puzzle. How

Re: Plugin development: how to get the phase

2007-07-30 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 30 Jul 07, at 1:18 PM 30 Jul 07, John Petritis wrote: I need to be able to get the phase my plugin is run in. Why? There is no way to get the phase a plugin is running in as you generally declare that from the outside i.e. a workflow that the mojo takes part in. I will probably

Re: Plugin development: how to get the phase

2007-07-30 Thread John Petritis
Here is why: It (my plugin) will be be run in multiple phases, and needs to log: - what pom is being made - what phase it is in - the time my plugin is run There are parts of our build that can take a very long time to run if certain problems occur. By monitoring a log of when some various

Re: What is Archiva.NEXT ?

2007-07-30 Thread Joakim Erdfelt
Both of those choices do not provide the ability for the client to identify itself. Maven doesn't do it. Wagon doesn't do it. Ivy doesn't do it. So we are left with having some identification of the client via the URL. The long term future direction of Archiva is to support as many clients as

Re: Plugin development: how to get the phase

2007-07-30 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 30 Jul 07, at 2:59 PM 30 Jul 07, John Petritis wrote: Here is why: Sure, I'm just saying that to do any of this the plugin doesn't need to know anything about the phase it's running in. This is definitely something you would want to do from a lifecycle perspective. If you want the

[VOTE] Release maven-docck-plugin 1.0-beta-2

2007-07-30 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Hi, I'd like to release maven-docck-plugin 1.0-beta-2. It has been 9 months since the last release. Release Notes: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11361styleName=Htmlversion=13021 Tag:

Re: it0088 broken

2007-07-30 Thread Kenney Westerhof
Hi, *Phew*, boy, did I open a can of worms when fixing this.. Short: it's fixed. Long: I broke it... Though I only broke an obscure hack.. This code shouldn't have been committed though I understand why it's done. (below jdcasey's comments, there's a long piece I wrote explaining what goes

Re: it0088 broken

2007-07-30 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 30 Jul 07, at 6:51 PM 30 Jul 07, Kenney Westerhof wrote: Hi, *Phew*, boy, did I open a can of worms when fixing this.. Short: it's fixed. Nice hunting. Long: I broke it... Though I only broke an obscure hack.. This code shouldn't have been committed though I understand why it's

Re: 1.0-beta-1 Release Date and Jiras..

2007-07-30 Thread Maria Odea Ching
Brett Porter wrote: On 27/07/2007, at 7:53 PM, Maria Odea Ching wrote: Hi All, Do you guys agree on the 1.0-beta-1 release next week (probably at the end of the week)? Sounds great! Anyway, here are some of the issues that were already resolved and will be included: - MRM-326

Re: Severe assembly plugin problem

2007-07-30 Thread John Casey
On Jul 30, 2007, at 8:18 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote: I've added code in 2.2-beta-2-snap to address this problem...at least, it should address it. I added resolution to the plugin before 2.2-beta-1 because there were issues when people wanted to create an assembly that didn't require

Re: Releases

2007-07-30 Thread Jason van Zyl
If you guys want to try the releases that would be good. I made the releases of p-u and plexus as a first stabilizing step. I have built doxia and the tests work fine but that's not necessarily representative of the site plugin working in 2.0.x and 2.1. I expect there might be some