+1 :)
On Nov 26, 2007 10:13 AM, Maria Odea Ching [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 \o/
-Deng
On 11/23/07, Maria Odea Ching [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Everyone,
The Archiva 1.0 release candidate has been prepared. Regressions for m1
proxy requests found in 1.0-beta-4 have been fixed and
Below are the results of this vote:
+6 Binding Votes (Brett, Joakim, Wendy, Fabrice, John and Myself)
+0 Non-binding Vote (Nicolas)
Yay! Thanks to everyone's efforts to finally get 1.0 out :)
I'll finalize the release and will send an update again.
Thanks,
Deng
On 11/23/07, Maria Odea Ching
That works.
On 26/11/2007, at 5:14 PM, Dan Fabulich wrote:
In revisions 598168 and 598171 I added support for an aggregate
mode to the surefire-report plugin. In this mode, the plugin will
aggregate XML test results from multiple directories, just like the
javadoc and jxr plugins.
In
As you should all know by now, I've been on a hard sprint most of this
week to get a reasonable-looking Surefire 2.4 out the door. I think we're
basically where I want it to be.
Just three main areas remain.
1) useSystemClassLoader issues
2) Snapshot dependencies
3) Measuring code coverage
Heh, that'd be revision 598217.
Dan Fabulich wrote:
SUREFIRE-121 requests that system properties set on the Maven process get
passed along to the child process.
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-121
e.g. he wants to do mvn test -Dselenium.user=test32 and have the test see
the
I forgot, there's one more issue that should really get into Surefire 2.4:
SUREFIRE-303 http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-303 Ignored/Skipped
tests are not reported
Currently there's no standard on the ground for how JUnit 4 @Ignores
should be handled. TestNG has a reasonable
Hi,
where can i find that page?
After writing test cases i now know how to read the binary files, almost
without the code but i need at least two defined constants a long magic
number.
But as far as i know it is still called copying, if i used the original
code to see what it does.
Does the EPL
+1
-Lukas
Brian E. Fox wrote:
It's that time again, finally. The RC's have been floating for a few
weeks now and no new issues have surfaced. (the packaging issues with
the uber jar have been resolved since the last vote)
The release is staged at:
+1
-Lukas
Dennis Lundberg wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to release maven-help-plugin 2.0.2.
This release fixes a couple of bugs and improves the documentation.
There are still improvements and feature requests left in JIRA, but I
feel that they can be schedules for a future 2.1 release.
The last
+1, works fine for me :)
-Deng
On 11/23/07, Brian E. Fox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's that time again, finally. The RC's have been floating for a few
weeks now and no new issues have surfaced. (the packaging issues with
the uber jar have been resolved since the last vote)
The release is
I put the team in copy because it's important to not do a bad choice.
On Nov 26, 2007 12:10 PM, Richard van Nieuwenhoven [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
i just asked Cliff (see attachment) and he says that only binary
redistribution is an option.
So four options left:
- extraction during
On 23/11/2007, Dennis Lundberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please report this in JIRA, as attachment to mailing lists have a nasty
habit of being forgotten.
Done,
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MASSEMBLY-250
I was hoping for some preliminary discussion, so as to be able to
create more precise
ouch, I didn't notice.
It's a maven 2 repository but not the central one.
Carlos, Jason, do you know why the content of http://repo1.maven.org/eclipse/
http://repo1.maven.org/eclipse/org/eclipse/core/org.eclipse.core.resources/3.2.1/isn't
available in http://repo1.maven.org/maven2
AFAIK this one is an experimental repository created by carlos.
(http://marc.info/?l=turbine-maven-devm=117393683323837w=2)
2007/11/26, Arnaud HERITIER [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
ouch, I didn't notice.
It's a maven 2 repository but not the central one.
Carlos, Jason, do you know why the content of
that's right, I still have to polish the eclipse plugin to generate
the Eclipse repo using some conventions
On Nov 26, 2007 10:04 PM, nicolas de loof [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
AFAIK this one is an experimental repository created by carlos.
This vote has passed:
Results:
Binding: +6 Brian, Lukas, Vincent, Stephane, Jason, Dennis
Non Binding: +6 Maria, Mauro, Nicolas, Olivier, Raphael, Fabrice
I will proceed with the merging of the artifacts tonight.
--Brian
-Original Message-
From: Brian E. Fox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ah, so we are back in the maven-eclipse-plugin to generate repository
from which a dependency we need in the maven-eclipse-plugin.
What are the open issues in the repository generation?
Ritchie
Carlos Sanchez wrote:
that's right, I still have to polish the eclipse plugin to generate
the
Can we upload some jars in the central repo and more precisely this one :
http://repo1.maven.org/eclipse/org/eclipse/core/org.eclipse.core.resources/3.2.1/
??
Arnaud
On Nov 26, 2007 4:15 PM, Carlos Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
that's right, I still have to polish the eclipse plugin to
Hi,
but it would be better to start with version 3.3.x even if the source we
need now is unchanged. I checked some other workspace reading stuff
and there was a rather good backward compatibility's stuff.
Ritchie
Arnaud HERITIER wrote:
Can we upload some jars in the central repo and more
On Nov 25, 2007, at 8:06 PM, Carl Trieloff wrote:
yes and no.
You can NOT copy files from EPL into an ASL project, or modify them
in an ASL project. However you can take a binary (jar) dependency on
an EPL binary. So you would have to copy the jar that the source is
in. However, the
Do you think there's a chance to get also the eclipse 3.3.1 binary jars
into this repository?
Thanks
Felix
Can we upload some jars in the central repo and more precisely this one :
http://repo1.maven.org/eclipse/org/eclipse/core/org.eclipse.core.resources/3.2.1/
??
Arnaud
On Nov 26, 2007
I don't want to mix all problems.
I'm not aware about problems of eclipse jars deployments on the central
repository.
Actually I just want one jar and I would like to know if it's possible to do
it
Arnaud
On Nov 26, 2007 5:23 PM, Felix Knecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you think there's a
That page was published on 30 Jan 2006, so at least it wasn't this
version of the plugin.
Wayne Fay wrote:
I'm not sure what version of site-plugin is responsible for the FAQ
page, but if its this version, there seem to be some issues...
http://maven.apache.org/faq.html
Wayne
On 11/25/07,
I'm not familiar with using a proxy and/or a mirror, but you also need
org.apache.maven.doxia:doxia-1.0-alpha-10 and
org.apache.maven.doxia:doxia-sitetools-1.0-alpha-10. Those are
dependencies of the site-plugin.
William Ferguson wrote:
OK, I'm trying to validate but I guess I have some bad
Hmm .. very frustrated now ..
I removed the mirror and still see it attempting to download the POM
from central (which it obviously can't).
It then downloads the plugin from the staging repository.
But then never looks for the POM in the staging repository and hence
fails with:
[ERROR] BUILD
put this in your ~/.m2/settings.xml
profile
iddennisl-staging/id
pluginRepositories
pluginRepository
idRemote resources plugin staging repository/id
urlhttp://people.apache.org/~dennisl/staging-repository-site-plugin/url
snapshots
You're right. This popped up on Google search, but it seems to be a
*very* old page. We should probably remove it completely!
The correct url is:
http://maven.apache.org/general.html
Perhaps we can eliminate this page, and forward faq.html to
general.html to avoid breaking the Google search?
OK, that embarrasing.
It had nothing to do with repository config.
I'd forgotten to change the version of the site-plugin in my pom to
2.0-beta-6
+1 [non binding]
William
-Original Message-
From: Dan Tran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 27 November 2007 11:59 AM
To: Maven
28 matches
Mail list logo
