On 7 Dec 07, at 6:59 PM 7 Dec 07, Daniel Kulp wrote:
Dan,
I think I just fixed MSHADE-5 (we were not closing the jarFile when
done
reading so it probably remained locked). I don't have a way to
test it
though. (No windows boxes)
MSHADE-9 is definitely an issue. I'll try and dig int
Dan,
I think I just fixed MSHADE-5 (we were not closing the jarFile when done
reading so it probably remained locked). I don't have a way to test it
though. (No windows boxes)
MSHADE-9 is definitely an issue. I'll try and dig into that, but most
of that seems to be done by asm. Not sur
Dan Fabulich wrote:
I didn't realize that shade had a JIRA project at the time, so I didn't file
bugs... I'll file them now.
OK, I've filed bugs MSHADE-5 through MSHADE-9. MSHADE-9 [failure to shade
plexus-archiver (interfaces not properly shaded)] is the absolute
show-stopper, though MSHAD
We had to revert back to the codehaus version to do 2.0.8 because
something in the apache version was definitely hosed.
-Original Message-
From: Dan Fabulich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2007 5:58 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: Status of maven-shade-plug
Daniel Kulp wrote:
2) What issues are known that still need fixing? (I fixed all the JIRAs
at http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSHADE)
Last time I used alpha-14 it was seriously broken. Specifically, it was
unable to shade plexus-archiver due to bugs in translating the interface.
I didn't
I just wanted to enquire about the status of the maven-shade-plugin.
I've fixed a bunch of things in it and added a few features and such.
I'd like to use it for my projects so I'd like to get a release, but the
fact that it's still in the sandbox kind of concerns me.
So:
1) Is it ready to m
I hope this is the right forum to ask this question. When writing a
maven Mojo the maven @component annotation allows you to inject a plexus
component. My question is how can I configure this plexus component to
use a custom components.xml instead of the default components.xml in the
component'
+1
Brett Porter wrote:
per the thread on [EMAIL PROTECTED] - should Archiva have it's own
[EMAIL PROTECTED] list?
[ ] +1
[ ] 0
[ ] -1
Cheers,
Brett
Hi Mauro,
Also, I would prefer an enforcer rule on the java version for the
junit4 provider instead of getting javac error. BTW, is it really
useful to compile with 1.4 this provider?
Cheers,
Vincent
2007/12/7, Mauro Talevi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Dan Fabulich wrote:
> >
> > Nope. SUREFIRE-347
Dan Fabulich wrote:
Nope. SUREFIRE-347 is "regression: plexus is not properly isolated"
which is what I'd wish we'd fix before we release 2.3.1.
Rolled back commits for 2.3.1 staging release and added regression issue
to 2.3.1 target again. Any other issue that can be fixed by weekend
s
10 matches
Mail list logo