This vote has been open for 4 days now so I'm going to close it.
Results:
+1 - dkulp, jvanzyl*, brianf*, jstrachan*, jdillon, dblevins
-1 - dfabulich (version number objection)
(*) Binding votes
There was also a +1 from mauro, but I could not determine if the +1 was
for the release or for th
i think you will find this is caused by broken metadata in third party
projects which seems to change somewhat at random depedending on the project
On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 15:23:44 dhoffer wrote:
> We are at a critical point with our usage of maven. We cannot update to
> 2.0.8 because 2.0.8 is broke
On 17-Jan-08, at 6:24 PM, Dan Fabulich wrote:
Responding out of order, techincal stuff first...
Daniel Kulp wrote:
The fact is MSHADE-9 is not something we can fix in maven-shade-
plugin. It's a bug in ASM and isn't fixable until they provide a
fix. (unless someone wants to jump into ASM
Milos Kleint wrote:
And some of them got hit by this one already:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-121
I've commited the hotfix.
I was a bit concerned about implementing SUREFIRE-121, but I only posted
about it on surefire-dev.
This hotfix switches from using System.getProperties t
On Sunday 20 January 2008, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> On 20-Jan-08, at 9:15 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
> > It probably should be switched to using the plexus
> > FileUtils.copyFile(...). We had the code in there while Dan F. and
> > I were trying to figure out why the renames were not working
> > (MSHADE
On 20-Jan-08, at 9:15 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
On Sunday 20 January 2008, Jason van Zyl wrote:
Why do we have huge chunks of logic for copying files in the shade
plugin? None of the utility libraries can copy a file correctly?
It probably should be switched to using the plexus
FileUtils.copyFi
On Sunday 20 January 2008, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> Why do we have huge chunks of logic for copying files in the shade
> plugin? None of the utility libraries can copy a file correctly?
It probably should be switched to using the plexus
FileUtils.copyFile(...). We had the code in there while Dan
On Dec 25, 2007 2:04 PM, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm personally not very interested in merging the plugins. I can
> explain more when I'm back from Thailand :-)
I use integration tests for 2 purposes:
* verifying
* documenting the use of the plugins
Such report would also allow
On Jan 13, 2008 5:39 AM, Dan Fabulich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Vote passed!
>
> PMC +1: Jason Van Zyl, Vincent Siveton, Brian Fox
>
> Non-binding +1: Dan Fabulich, Marat Radchenko, Dan Tran, Mauro Talevi,
> Jerome Lacoste, Oliver Lamy
>
> I'll update the repo (probably on Monday) and send out a
