Re: Trouble with 'mvn site' for archiva/trunk

2008-02-03 Thread Brett Porter
Just coming back to this - it is working for me now. (Perhaps this is because the site plugin was downgraded again, since the docs were broken with the latest release) On 31/12/2007, at 6:06 AM, Wendy Smoak wrote: I'm having trouble running 'mvn site' from archiva/trunk. (Also from the

Archiva 1.1 Roadmap

2008-02-03 Thread James William Dumay
Hey guys, Just wanted to help kick off our way to a 1.1 release Here have been a few things that have been at the back of my mind. I think this is a list we should pick and choose from: * Reduce memory consumption * Preemptive artifact synchronisation * Eliminate client side blocking when

Please avoid non-backward compatible API changes - Was: Re: svn commit: r617944 - in /maven/artifact/trunk/src: main/java/org/apache/maven/artifact/ main/java/org/apache/maven/artifact/deployer/ main/

2008-02-03 Thread Milos Kleint
Hello Jason, Please revert this change or make it backward comaptible. Removing getArtifactHandler() from Artifact interface might be conceptually right, but it breaks lots of thing. 1. a few tests are broken in the maven components. 2. More important is that every plugin have ever made that

Re: How to get the compile class path for a project?

2008-02-03 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Thanks for the tip Brian. You lead be on a path to find the answer, which was not obvious to me before I dove into the dependency-plugin code. I couldn't understand why I always got 0 artifacts back from project.getArtifacts(). Finally I found the answer: @requiresDependencyResolution

MNG-3284

2008-02-03 Thread Nigel Magnay
Hi. In our work projects, we're *constantly* being bitten by the 'first version of a plugin used wins' problem, which seems variously described in particular MNG JIRA items, mine in particular being MNG-3284. I've had a go at fixing it as it didn't seem that complicated - but - some of the

Re: Please avoid non-backward compatible API changes - Was: Re: svn commit: r617944 - in /maven/artifact/trunk/src: main/java/org/apache/maven/artifact/ main/java/org/apache/maven/artifact/deployer/ m

2008-02-03 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 3-Feb-08, at 3:45 AM, Milos Kleint wrote: Hello Jason, Please revert this change or make it backward comaptible. Removing getArtifactHandler() from Artifact interface might be conceptually right, but it breaks lots of thing. Not intentional, I ran everything on this side and the ITs so

Re: Please avoid non-backward compatible API changes - Was: Re: svn commit: r617944 - in /maven/artifact/trunk/src: main/java/org/apache/maven/artifact/ main/java/org/apache/maven/artifact/deployer/ m

2008-02-03 Thread Jason van Zyl
I rolled them back for the time being and put them on a branch as I'm headed out today. I'll put an aspect in, and then add a test for the artifact handler use in maven-artifact and make an IT like one of the plugins. I've got a few branches here in GIT, that didn't go in correctly but I

RE: MNG-3284

2008-02-03 Thread Brian E. Fox
This is fixed in 2.1, but if you are constantly having this problem, it sounds like maybe you need to use pluginManagement in a corp pom to resolve this issue. -Original Message- From: Nigel Magnay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2008 8:44 AM To: dev@maven.apache.org

Re: MNG-3284

2008-02-03 Thread Nigel Magnay
The problem is that putting it in pluginManagement doesn't help because the builds genuinely do want to use different versions, particularly of internally-developed mojos that change in different (and sometimes incompatible ways). A typical case is a base library uses a fixed, stable release, but

verifier 1.1 release?

2008-02-03 Thread Brett Porter
Hi, The current trunk of verifier is 1.2-SNAPSHOT, and a 1.1 release was tagged here: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrevision=573467 However, I see no vote for it in Nov and it never made it to the release repository. Jason? Should we just roll back the tag? - Brett

Re: Install maven 20.8 on maven.zones.a.o

2008-02-03 Thread Brett Porter
You have a log in on the machine so should be able to install it - ore are you referring to have it included in the Continuum profiles? - Brett On 02/02/2008, at 8:01 AM, Arnaud HERITIER wrote: Nobody ? No idea ? I would like to be sure that the build is good before to release the plugin

[Discuss] MPLUGIN-40

2008-02-03 Thread Vincent Siveton
Hi, I realize that the fix for MPLUGIN-40 (All plugins should by default have an auto-generated goal 'help') is definitely *not* intuitive for the end user. Background: I created a plugin-plugin goal which generates an Help mojo. This generated mojo just displays the goals and their

Re: [Discuss] MPLUGIN-40

2008-02-03 Thread Vincent Siveton
Hi Brett, What do you propose for cmd line switch? Personally, I am fine with mvn my-plugin:help which seems more common. A lot of tools (all?) have an help option. Cheers, Vincent 2008/2/3, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Would a different lifecycle or command line switch be more intuitive

Re: [Discuss] MPLUGIN-40

2008-02-03 Thread Brett Porter
Something like mvn -H idea:idea or mvn -H idea which is akin to what Subversion has, for example. this would allow the CLI to translate to the appropriate help:describe goal and then exit, which is pretty clean, as compared to modifying the lifecycle executor. - Brett On 04/02/2008, at

Re: Install maven 20.8 on maven.zones.a.o

2008-02-03 Thread Arnaud HERITIER
yep, the second one. I would like to be able to configure the eclipse plugin to use it when I'll install it. Arnaud On Feb 3, 2008 11:43 PM, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You have a log in on the machine so should be able to install it - ore are you referring to have it included in

Re: [Discuss] MPLUGIN-40

2008-02-03 Thread Brett Porter
Would a different lifecycle or command line switch be more intuitive than this? On 04/02/2008, at 9:55 AM, Vincent Siveton wrote: Hi, I realize that the fix for MPLUGIN-40 (All plugins should by default have an auto-generated goal 'help') is definitely *not* intuitive for the end user.

Re: Install maven 20.8 on maven.zones.a.o

2008-02-03 Thread Arnaud HERITIER
Finally I already did it but I have a question about continuum. Can I ask to one project to use a different profile of the one defined in the group ? It seems to not be possible. I can add a new build for the eclipse plugin with this profile but it will continue to be built (and to fail) with

Re: Install maven 20.8 on maven.zones.a.o

2008-02-03 Thread Arnaud HERITIER
yes it's good, I can administrate profiles. thanks. I'll do the setup tomorrow cheers On Feb 4, 2008 1:28 AM, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: you should be able to add that now On 04/02/2008, at 10:29 AM, Arnaud HERITIER wrote: yep, the second one. I would like to be able to

Re: Install maven 20.8 on maven.zones.a.o

2008-02-03 Thread Brett Porter
It's kind of like Maven inheritence, you can't block inheriting things from the group. I would be ok with building all the plugins with 2.0.8 as the latest release... On 04/02/2008, at 11:47 AM, Arnaud HERITIER wrote: Finally I already did it but I have a question about continuum. Can I

Re: Install maven 20.8 on maven.zones.a.o

2008-02-03 Thread Brett Porter
you should be able to add that now On 04/02/2008, at 10:29 AM, Arnaud HERITIER wrote: yep, the second one. I would like to be able to configure the eclipse plugin to use it when I'll install it. Arnaud On Feb 3, 2008 11:43 PM, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You have a log in on the

Upgrade the version of maven to build all plugins on m.z.a.o was Re: Install maven 2.0.8 on maven.zones.a.o

2008-02-03 Thread Arnaud HERITIER
Everybody is ok to upgrade the version of maven used to build all our plugins on maven.zones.apache.org (from 2.0.7 to 2.0.8) ? Arnaud On Feb 4, 2008 1:50 AM, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's kind of like Maven inheritence, you can't block inheriting things from the group. I would

[ANNOUNCE] Archiva 1.0.1 Released

2008-02-03 Thread Maria Odea Ching
Hi Everyone, The Maven Archiva team is pleased to announce the release of Archiva 1.0.1 Archiva is a build artifact repository manager for use with build tools such as Maven, Continuum and Ant. It has features like repository search and browse, securing repositories, identifying unknown

[Results] [VOTE] Release Archiva 1.0.1 (Take 2)

2008-02-03 Thread Maria Odea Ching
Below are the results of this vote: +5 Binding Votes (Brett, Fabrice, Arnaud, Wendy and Myself) +1 Non-binding Vote (Nicolas) I'll finalize the release and will send an update again. Thanks, Deng On Jan 29, 2008 7:11 PM, Maria Odea Ching [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Everyone, The Archiva

Re: [Discuss] MPLUGIN-40

2008-02-03 Thread Jason van Zyl
I think keeping this out of the core, be that the lifecycle executor or the CLI would be a far better option. Vincent, just to be clear you have taken the logic that already exists in the help plugin? On 3-Feb-08, at 3:17 PM, Brett Porter wrote: Something like mvn -H idea:idea or mvn -H

Re: [Discuss] MPLUGIN-40

2008-02-03 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 3-Feb-08, at 2:55 PM, Vincent Siveton wrote: Hi, I realize that the fix for MPLUGIN-40 (All plugins should by default have an auto-generated goal 'help') is definitely *not* intuitive for the end user. Background: I created a plugin-plugin goal which generates an Help mojo. This generated