On 04/08/2008, at 2:11 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
Put it somewhere better if you want it to be useful. It's just
taking up space otherwise.
How about adding this to the bottom of the front page:
If you want to put it higher that's fine. No one will see it down
there. I'm all for giving the
Hi,
Does anyone mind if I integrate the Ant component factory code over
here in maven-ant? I'm cleaning up Plexus in preparation for a move
here and the ant factory code is not used anywhere but here, and it's
unlikely anyone would write components outside a build system in Ant
script. It
On 3-Aug-08, at 9:05 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
On 04/08/2008, at 1:46 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
Look at the analytics, zero traffic.
I didn't expect them to be high on traffic, but you should put them
somewhere else before dumping them outright.
They are not low, they are zero.
Put
On 04/08/2008, at 1:46 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
Look at the analytics, zero traffic.
I didn't expect them to be high on traffic, but you should put them
somewhere else before dumping them outright.
Put it somewhere better if you want it to be useful. It's just
taking up space otherwis
Look at the analytics, zero traffic.
Put it somewhere better if you want it to be useful. It's just taking
up space otherwise.
On 3-Aug-08, at 8:37 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
On 04/08/2008, at 1:32 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-
-
- http://www.apache.org/foundation/sponsorship.html
On 04/08/2008, at 1:32 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-
-
- http://www.apache.org/foundation/sponsorship.html
" />
- http://www.apache.org/foundation/thanks.html
" />
-
These were requested by the PRC some time back.
- Brett
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.
+1
Vincent
2008/8/3 Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> This release is to prepare for the release of Maven WAR Plugin.
>
> This is a new shared component, based on code from Maven Resources Plugin,
> so there are no issues fixed or left in JIRA. The goal of this component is
> to prov
Hi Dennis,
Did you redeploy the site? I don't see r682147... Maybe it is the
sync, wait and see.
Cheers,
Vincent
2008/8/3 Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> Second try, this time with a license header in the POM.
>
> Note: there is one error in the Clirr report. It was necessary to
Hi Hervé,
IMHO, this survey should be also on user@
Cheers,
Vincent
2008/8/3 Hervé BOUTEMY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> While working on "Report Encoding Configuration" proposal [0], 2 options were
> discussed lately for default value [1]:
>
> a) use fixed UTF-8 encoding
>
> b) use same encod
Hi guys,
Any idea about this failure ?
Now I fixed the build, it fails with a deployment error :-(
Arnaud
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 12:31 AM, Hudson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> See
> http://ci.sonatype.org/job/maven-eclipse-plugin-trunk/org.apache.maven.plugins$maven-eclipse-plugin/3/changes
If there is a good way to make it work, the source files sounds "best"
as it is reproducible and gives a default that should work in most
instances. However, I think there are some reports that would have
multiple source files, and they could be of mixed encodings, right? If
that would be a
+1
Thanks!
--
Olivier
2008/8/3 Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> This release is to prepare for the release of Maven WAR Plugin.
>
> This is a new shared component, based on code from Maven Resources Plugin,
> so there are no issues fixed or left in JIRA. The goal of this component is
Hi,
Second try, this time with a license header in the POM.
Note: there is one error in the Clirr report. It was necessary to make
that change to solve the testing for IDEA-102, so it's by design.
We solved 8 issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11135&styleName=
+1
--
Olivier
2008/8/3 Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> It's time to release the Deploy plugin.
>
> We solved 3 issues and added 1 new feature:
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=13110&styleName=Text&projectId=11131&Create=Create
>
>* [MDEPLOY-45] - Classifier not sup
+1
--
Olivier
2008/8/3 Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> This release is to prepare for the release of Maven Invoker Plugin, which is
> needed by many projects.
>
> We solved 1 issue:
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11761&styleName=Html&version=14369
>
> T
Le dimanche 03 août 2008, Jason van Zyl a écrit :
> What about the default system encoding?
At the moment, most plugins have a fixed value (ISO-8859-1 for site and jxr
plugins, UTF-8 for corbertura plugin)
Changing for default system encoding would be a build reproducibility
regression: not a goo
Jason van Zyl wrote:
What about the default system encoding?
It would be part of the show for approach b). The effective encoding
would be determined by this chain:
report encoding -> source encoding -> system encoding
i.e. if report output encoding is not specified, fallback to source f
Vote canceled. The POM was missing a license header.
Dennis Lundberg wrote:
Hi,
We solved 8 issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11135&styleName=Html&version=13580
There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.j
Hi,
This release is to prepare for the release of Maven WAR Plugin.
This is a new shared component, based on code from Maven Resources
Plugin, so there are no issues fixed or left in JIRA. The goal of this
component is to provide a common tool for maven plugins to filtering
resources.
Stagi
What about the default system encoding?
On 3-Aug-08, at 1:20 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
Hi,
While working on "Report Encoding Configuration" proposal [0], 2
options were
discussed lately for default value [1]:
a) use fixed UTF-8 encoding
b) use same encoding as source files
Both options s
Hi,
While working on "Report Encoding Configuration" proposal [0], 2 options were
discussed lately for default value [1]:
a) use fixed UTF-8 encoding
b) use same encoding as source files
Both options seem viable: choosing between them will be a question of taste.
Hence this poll: what is your
Hi
It's time to start releasing our parent POMs:
1. Maven Parent 9
2. Maven Plugins 12 and Maven Shared Components 10
If someone has something they want to add to them, now is the time to do
it. I'll start the first release vote on Tuesday evening GMT+1, so you
have 48+ hours to scratch your
There were no objections to the promotion from the sandbox.
One -1 vote on the release, by dennisl. Olivier agreed to cancel the
release vote because of that. A new vote for the release will come later on.
I'll start working on the promotion from sandbox.
Olivier Lamy wrote:
Hi,
In preparati
John,
regression has been fixed on Pico build.
Cheers
John Casey wrote:
Hi,
Here's your daily dose of Maven 2.0.10! I've fixed the regressions
pointed out in RC4, and added integration tests to guard against their
reintroduction. The new release candidate can be found here:
http://people.
Yes (after my week-end ;-) ).
--
Olivier
2008/8/3 Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 6:48 AM, Benjamin Bentmann
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> So, I assume your local POM states 2.4 as the version, right?
>
> Perhaps when it failed during the release, but not when I was
25 matches
Mail list logo
