Hi Olivier,
How does this relate to MNG-3402?
Just wondering because we had a lot of discussions about this issue in the past
wrt Doxia release plan [1], and from other peoples' comments I always got the
impression that it will lead to trouble... even though I never noticed anything
myself.
Hi,
It looks related sure :-).
I didn't notice the existing jira entry.
I'm currently made some tests with current trunk on some projects
(company ones and oss ones) to test backward compatibility/
And I have noticed I couldn't run anymore : mvn site:site (just
generate the site works now all
Just in case, are you aware of these:
http://maven.apache.org/doxia/whatsnew-1.1.html#Binary_Incompatibility
http://maven.apache.org/doxia/developers/maven-integration.html
maybe it helps...
-Lukas
Olivier Lamy wrote:
Hi,
It looks related sure :-).
I didn't notice the existing jira entry.
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 4:22 AM, David Jencksdavid_jen...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Jun 10, 2009, at 6:59 PM, Brian Fox wrote:
Update:
The new assembly plugin and the regex in the source bundle seem to be
working great. I have just one thing to resolve that I had previously
overlooked: The source
Hi All,
I'm a bit new to the whole maven thing so bare with me please.
I'm having issues with the release plugin. I can release my core
library's with out any problems but I'm struggling with the multi module
project.
1. When I do a prepare for my project, the web module fails saying it
cant
I created a bug report in JIRA on June 1 against the release plugin
which included a failing simple test case and a patch with a unit test
and code change to resolve the bug. I was wondering if a committer
could take a look at it.
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MRELEASE-449
Thanks.
I had to include these files for the recent maven-assembly-plugin
release. It was fairly simple, just take a look at this:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/plugins/trunk/maven-assembly-plugin/src/main/assembly/source-release.xml
-john
Brian Fox wrote:
Update:
The new assembly plugin and
Jason van Zyl wrote:
I just did this to the request before processing:
request.getProperties().put( ${build.timestamp}, new
SimpleDateFormat( MMdd-hhmm ).format( request.getStartTime() ) );
The problem with this approach is that the format should be customizable
by a
On Jun 11, 2009, at 4:52 AM, Brian Fox wrote:
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 4:22 AM, David
Jencksdavid_jen...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Jun 10, 2009, at 6:59 PM, Brian Fox wrote:
Update:
The new assembly plugin and the regex in the source bundle seem to
be
working great. I have just one thing to
Well, I'm not sure what to say about that. I guess I could say if it's
not on the release docs, it's not policy? It's a little frustrating to
constantly chase a standard that isn't documented and which there are
many opinions of. I'll solve this particular problem of the source
release for now. I
On Jun 11, 2009, at 9:56 AM, David Jencks wrote:
On Jun 11, 2009, at 4:52 AM, Brian Fox wrote:
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 4:22 AM, David
Jencksdavid_jen...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Jun 10, 2009, at 6:59 PM, Brian Fox wrote:
Update:
The new assembly plugin and the regex in the source bundle
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 12:11 AM, John Caseyjdca...@commonjava.org wrote:
I had to include these files for the recent maven-assembly-plugin release.
It was fairly simple, just take a look at this:
Issue Subscription
Filter: Design Best Practices (28 issues)
Subscriber: mavendevlist
Key Summary
MNG-2184Possible problem with @aggregator and forked lifecycles
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2184
MNG-612 implement conflict resolution techniques
13 matches
Mail list logo
