Issue Subscription
Filter: Design & Best Practices (28 issues)
Subscriber: mavendevlist
Key Summary
MNG-2184Possible problem with @aggregator and forked lifecycles
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2184
MNG-612 implement conflict resolution techniques
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 12:11 AM, John Casey wrote:
> I had to include these files for the recent maven-assembly-plugin release.
> It was fairly simple, just take a look at this:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/plugins/trunk/maven-assembly-plugin/src/main/assembly/source-release.xml
Be a
On Jun 11, 2009, at 9:56 AM, David Jencks wrote:
On Jun 11, 2009, at 4:52 AM, Brian Fox wrote:
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 4:22 AM, David
Jencks wrote:
On Jun 10, 2009, at 6:59 PM, Brian Fox wrote:
Update:
The new assembly plugin and the regex in the source bundle seem
to be
working great
Well, I'm not sure what to say about that. I guess I could say if it's
not on the release docs, it's not policy? It's a little frustrating to
constantly chase a standard that isn't documented and which there are
many opinions of. I'll solve this particular problem of the source
release for now. I h
On 11-Jun-09, at 6:47 PM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
Jason van Zyl wrote:
I just did this to the request before processing:
request.getProperties().put( "${build.timestamp}", new
SimpleDateFormat( "MMdd-
hhmm" ).format( request.getStartTime() ) );
The problem with this appro
On Jun 11, 2009, at 4:52 AM, Brian Fox wrote:
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 4:22 AM, David
Jencks wrote:
On Jun 10, 2009, at 6:59 PM, Brian Fox wrote:
Update:
The new assembly plugin and the regex in the source bundle seem to
be
working great. I have just one thing to resolve that I had
prev
On 11-Jun-09, at 8:53 AM, Lukas Theussl wrote:
Hi Olivier,
How does this relate to MNG-3402?
This doesn't relate to anything in 3.x because it's not going to be an
issue because no doxia classes will be distributed with 3.x. Not sure
what you guys are planning for 3.x.
Just wondering
There's nothing Doxia specific in the core, that was just a lingering
element in the POM.
Plan in a nutshell is that the entire existing reporting mechanism
will be encapsulated in the site plugin and I will provide any hooks
in the lifecycle to make it work.
The mixture of reports and pl
Jason van Zyl wrote:
I just did this to the request before processing:
request.getProperties().put( "${build.timestamp}", new
SimpleDateFormat( "MMdd-hhmm" ).format( request.getStartTime() ) );
The problem with this approach is that the format should be customizable
by a pr
I had to include these files for the recent maven-assembly-plugin
release. It was fairly simple, just take a look at this:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/plugins/trunk/maven-assembly-plugin/src/main/assembly/source-release.xml
-john
Brian Fox wrote:
Update:
The new assembly plugin and
I created a bug report in JIRA on June 1 against the release plugin
which included a failing simple test case and a patch with a unit test
and code change to resolve the bug. I was wondering if a committer
could take a look at it.
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MRELEASE-449
Thanks.
---
Hi All,
I'm a bit new to the whole maven thing so bare with me please.
I'm having issues with the release plugin. I can release my "core"
library's with out any problems but I'm struggling with the multi module
project.
1. When I do a prepare for my project, the web module fails saying it
cant g
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 4:22 AM, David Jencks wrote:
>
> On Jun 10, 2009, at 6:59 PM, Brian Fox wrote:
>
>> Update:
>> The new assembly plugin and the regex in the source bundle seem to be
>> working great. I have just one thing to resolve that I had previously
>> overlooked: The source archive mus
On Jun 10, 2009, at 6:59 PM, Brian Fox wrote:
Update:
The new assembly plugin and the regex in the source bundle seem to be
working great. I have just one thing to resolve that I had previously
overlooked: The source archive must also contain license and notice
files, even if svn doesn't.
I d
Just in case, are you aware of these:
http://maven.apache.org/doxia/whatsnew-1.1.html#Binary_Incompatibility
http://maven.apache.org/doxia/developers/maven-integration.html
maybe it helps...
-Lukas
Olivier Lamy wrote:
Hi,
It looks related sure :-).
I didn't notice the existing jira entry.
I
Hi,
It looks related sure :-).
I didn't notice the existing jira entry.
I'm currently made some tests with current trunk on some projects
(company ones and oss ones) to test backward compatibility/
And I have noticed I couldn't run anymore : mvn site:site (just
generate the site works now all repo
16 matches
Mail list logo
