Re: svn commit: r785347 - /maven/components/trunk/pom.xml

2009-06-17 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 17-Jun-09, at 1:04 AM, Brett Porter wrote: On 17/06/2009, at 5:18 AM, jvan...@apache.org wrote: Author: jvanzyl Date: Tue Jun 16 19:18:18 2009 New Revision: 785347 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=785347view=rev Log: o adding changes to provide dynamic mapping to m2e lifecycle

maven-site-plugin for current core trunk was [ Re: svn commit: r783525 - /maven/components/trunk/maven-core/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/DefaultArtifactFilterManager.java ]

2009-06-17 Thread Olivier Lamy
Hi, Thanks for the tip. But as I see you have patched the trunk to fix that (thanks again :-) ). Just FYI, as I have started some work on maven-site-plugin [1], I have discovered we can't use anymore the current plugin testing harness when a plugin depends on the core artifacts trunk so I have

Re: maven-site-plugin for current core trunk was [ Re: svn commit: r783525 - /maven/components/trunk/maven-core/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/DefaultArtifactFilterManager.java ]

2009-06-17 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 17-Jun-09, at 7:55 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote: Hi, Thanks for the tip. But as I see you have patched the trunk to fix that (thanks again :-) ). Just FYI, as I have started some work on maven-site-plugin [1], I have discovered we can't use anymore the current plugin testing harness when a

Re: [m2eclipse-user] Re: Maven, M2Eclipse, Nexus @ Eclipse DemoCamp in Budapest

2009-06-17 Thread Stevo Slavić
When in Szeged, why not come by to Novi Sad as well? :) Regards, Stevo. 2009/6/16 Tamás Cservenák ta...@cservenak.net Also, two of us will be at University of Szeged on Friday 19th, doing the same we'll be doing some demos and chatting with folks. The beer will came later, most probably at

Friday Maven Call

2009-06-17 Thread Jason van Zyl
Same time of the day as a couple days ago. http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingdetails.html?year=2009month=6day=19hour=15min=0sec=0p1=250p2=224p3=195p4=240 We'll sort out another bridge as we need more room. I'll get that published tomorrow and we'll pick one we can just use every

Re: Friday Maven Call

2009-06-17 Thread Brett Porter
Any chance of rotating it? I'm not sure I can take two late night calls in a week (unless I happen to be up with the baby, but then you don't want me off mute :). I also didn't see any notes posted from the last one? That really has to be an essential part of doing this - particularly for

Re: Friday Maven Call

2009-06-17 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 17-Jun-09, at 9:02 AM, Brett Porter wrote: Any chance of rotating it? No, I don't want to rotate it. Let's just find a time that works for everyone. It's too hard for people to schedule when it's changing all the time. Seems to work best at Eclipse when people can plan ahead several

Re: maven-site-plugin for current core trunk was [ Re: svn commit: r783525 - /maven/components/trunk/maven-core/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/DefaultArtifactFilterManager.java ]

2009-06-17 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 17-Jun-09, at 7:55 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote: Hi, Thanks for the tip. But as I see you have patched the trunk to fix that (thanks again :-) ). Just FYI, as I have started some work on maven-site-plugin [1], I have discovered we can't use anymore the current plugin testing harness when a

Re: Friday Maven Call

2009-06-17 Thread Brett Porter
On 17/06/2009, at 6:44 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote: On 17-Jun-09, at 9:02 AM, Brett Porter wrote: Any chance of rotating it? No, I don't want to rotate it. Let's just find a time that works for everyone. It's too hard for people to schedule when it's changing all the time. Seems to work

Re: Friday Maven Call

2009-06-17 Thread Olivier Lamy
Hi, I'd like to participate but I have some job constraints. (in some countries this time is happy hour time but not in France :-) ). I have made some various tests with the trunk (with our projects and with companies build) (thanks to benjamin for some quick fixes). So for the record, I have the

FW: release plugin?

2009-06-17 Thread Nord, James
No response on the users list. Should I file a bug for this or is it expected behaviour? /James -Original Message- From: Nord, James [mailto:jn...@nds.com] Sent: 16 June 2009 11:21 To: Maven Users List Subject: release plugin? Hi all, Why if I specify exactly what versions to use

Re: Friday Maven Call

2009-06-17 Thread Brian Fox
I have the recording, any particular place I should check it in? On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 4:44 AM, Jason van Zyl jvan...@sonatype.com wrote: On 17-Jun-09, at 9:02 AM, Brett Porter wrote: Any chance of rotating it? No, I don't want to rotate it. Let's just find a time that works for

Re: Friday Maven Call

2009-06-17 Thread Ralph Goers
I have a meeting conflict this week and won't be able to attend. Ralph On Jun 17, 2009, at 12:55 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote: Same time of the day as a couple days ago. http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingdetails.html?year=2009month=6day=19hour=15min=0sec=0p1=250p2=224p3=195p4=240

[CANCELED] [VOTE] Maven 2.2.0

2009-06-17 Thread John Casey
*SIGH* It looks like we have a bug in the currently staged Maven 2.2.0 version. The problem seems to stem from the fact that the non-lightweight http wagon depends on log4j. Since log4j is shaded into the eventual Maven distribution, the log4j properties file seems to lose track of the

[VOTE] Maven 2.2.0 (Second Attempt)

2009-06-17 Thread John Casey
Hi, I'm opening a new vote for Maven 2.2.0 after closing: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-4169 http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-4207 All URLs below have been updated where appropriate. --- Okay, it looks like there haven't been many problems with the latest RC of Maven 2.2.0.

Re: Problem with multi-module archetype

2009-06-17 Thread Bill Milligan
Hi Jason, I hit the same issue. I hope you raised a JIRA! Since I'm impatient and can't wait for a resolution, I'm planning on getting around it by renaming directories and module names in my root pom via an ant task bound to the process-sources phase of my archetype build. Here's hoping it