Re: Suggested change to site / release

2009-07-10 Thread Arnaud HERITIER
+1 for all that improve our horrible website.Your proposal is good, giving a better management of // branches, thus +1 Cheers, Arnaud # Arnaud Héritier # Software Factory Manager # eXo Platform # http://www.exoplatform.com # http://blog.aheritier.net On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 7:48 AM, Brett

Re: Why is ear:generate-application-xml used by eclipse:eclipse?

2009-07-10 Thread jdboer
baerrach wrote: On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 6:19 AM, J. den Boerjdb...@diversit.eu wrote: I'm trying to find the problem why no Eclipse project files can be generated of an Ear project without installing the required dependencies first. I've seen that it's caused by the

Re: Suggested change to site / release

2009-07-10 Thread Emmanuel Venisse
+1 for all Emmanuel On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 7:48 AM, Brett Porter br...@apache.org wrote: Hi, I've committed some changes that I'd like reviewed to go forward with which makes Maven releases easier. 1) see http://maven.apache.org/docs/2.0.11-RC1-SNAPSHOT/release-notes.html (may not be

[VOTE] Release Maven Checkstyle Plugin version 2.3

2009-07-10 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Hi, The main reason for this release is to get the current trunk out to our users. This will be the last release that will work with Java 1.4. The next release after this one will be upgraded to Checkstyle 5.0 and will therefor require Java 5. We solved 5 issues:

[VOTE] Release Maven Site Plugin version 2.0.1

2009-07-10 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Hi, The main reason for this release is to get the current trunk out to our users. This will be the last release using Doxia 1.0. The next release after this one will use Doxia 1.1.x. We solved 3 issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11146styleName=Htmlversion=15076

[VOTE] Release Maven EJB Plugin version 2.2

2009-07-10 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Hi, It has been well over two years since the last release, so it's about time... We solved 6 issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11134styleName=Htmlversion=13201 There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:

[VOTE] Release Maven Stage Plugin version 1.0-alpha-2

2009-07-10 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Hi, I'd like to release this to help projects that hasn't switched over to using Nexus yet. We solved 2 issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11695styleName=Htmlversion=13937 There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:

Re: Suggested change to site / release

2009-07-10 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 10-Jul-09, at 1:48 AM, Brett Porter wrote: Hi, I've committed some changes that I'd like reviewed to go forward with which makes Maven releases easier. 1) see http://maven.apache.org/docs/2.0.11-RC1-SNAPSHOT/release-notes.html (may not be present yet due to proxying), and relevant

Re: svn commit: r792795 - in /maven/maven-2/branches/maven-2.2.x: ./ maven-artifact-manager/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/artifact/manager/ maven-core/ maven-core/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/exten

2009-07-10 Thread John Casey
Hi Brett, my responses are inline: Brett Porter wrote: + +private String getWagonHint( String protocol, String repositoryId ) +{ +// TODO: Implement a better way to get the hint, via settings.xml or something. While this effectively is the same, I think it could be

Re: Suggested change to site / release

2009-07-10 Thread Jesse McConnell
2) see commits in site branch. The basic approach is this: * push all release notes into docs/$version/release-notes.html instead of the consolidated older format and add a page to list them in order So if someone wants to see the historical list of changes they will need to look at N

Re: Suggested change to site / release

2009-07-10 Thread Brian Fox
I think jira should remain the consolidated list of bugs fixed during a release. Having it on the site is important, but specifically I don't want to have yet another file to update each time i fix a bug. Grabbing the release notes from jira and updating the site is nice and efficient and pretty

Re: Suggested change to site / release

2009-07-10 Thread Brett Porter
sorry, these changes should have been on a branch. I'll move that across now so that trunk is still deployable. I'm heading out now but I can respond to these issues later. On 11/07/2009, at 12:27 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote: On 10-Jul-09, at 1:48 AM, Brett Porter wrote: Hi, I've committed

Re: Why is ear:generate-application-xml used by eclipse:eclipse?

2009-07-10 Thread Barrie Treloar
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 6:17 PM, jdboerjdb...@diversit.eu wrote: I know about the lifecycle and I've seen the ear lifecycle. Because the ear:generateApplicationXml goal is causing the problem (probably) I created a custom Ear plugin with version 2.3.2-TEST in which I removed the