On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 10:41 AM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 6:45 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
> > In what instances do you find you need to use them? I thought for plugins,
> > with the use of @since and similar descriptive text it wasn't needed.
>
> Count me -0 on removing them.
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 6:45 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
> In what instances do you find you need to use them? I thought for plugins,
> with the use of @since and similar descriptive text it wasn't needed.
Count me -0 on removing them. We keep versioned docs around for a lot
of things and I think t
Brett Porter wrote:
Staging repo: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-010/
Staging site: http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-help-plugin-2.1.1/
+1
Benjamin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@m
On 24/03/2010, at 5:43 AM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 10:43 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
>> In the release docs [1], there is nothing about removing the staged
>> documentation directory after it is completed. This means we have a lot of
>> versioned directories of plugin sites, b
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 10:43 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
> In the release docs [1], there is nothing about removing the staged
> documentation directory after it is completed. This means we have a lot of
> versioned directories of plugin sites, but they are never linked to. Should
> they be remove
On 2010-03-23 03:43, Brett Porter wrote:
> In the release docs [1], there is nothing about removing the staged
> documentation directory after it is completed. This means we have a lot of
> versioned directories of plugin sites, but they are never linked to. Should
> they be removed?
+1
> Perh
Hi. I have a requirement to use a javaagent and system properties in the same
test run. I found out about the properties mentioned in the title, but here
is what I noticed (mvn 2.2.1):
- to be able to use the agent () JVM has to be forked, but then
are not set
- when never javaagent naturally doe
2010/3/23 Brett Porter :
> In the release docs [1], there is nothing about removing the staged
> documentation directory after it is completed. This means we have a lot of
> versioned directories of plugin sites, but they are never linked to. Should
> they be removed?
IMHO yes
>
> Perhaps it w
+1
2010/3/21 Benjamin Bentmann :
> Hi,
>
> We solved 3 issues:
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11540&version=16164
>
> There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&pid=11540&status=1
>
> Staging repo:
