Hi,
We solved 39 issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=16089
There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&pid=10500&status=1
Staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/reposito
+1
Wee!
On Apr 19, 2010, at 10:50 AM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 39 issues:
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=16089
>
> There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=tr
+1
On 19 April 2010 19:12, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> +1
>
> Wee!
>
> On Apr 19, 2010, at 10:50 AM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > We solved 39 issues:
> >
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=16089
> >
> > There are still a couple of issues left
Just a question, without voicing an opinion: I notice the "beta". What
is the meaning? Are there any plans of a schedule towards a 3.0 final?
Thanks,
Jochen
--
Germanys national anthem is the most boring in the world - how telling!
-
What project are you a committer on?
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 10:42 PM, Delos wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to set up a staging site with "mvn release:perform". The process
> seems blocked when I saw the message below.
>
> [INFO] [INFO] Generating "Dependency Convergence" report.
> [INFO] [INFO] [si
+1
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 7:50 PM, Benjamin Bentmann <
benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 39 issues:
>
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=16089
>
> There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
>
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Issu
+1
Glad to see a movement to beta
Shane
+1
ma., 19.04.2010 kl. 19.50 +0200, skrev Benjamin Bentmann:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 39 issues:
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=16089
>
> There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&pid=
+1
Thus we start only bug fixes releases ?
Guice won't be included in 3.0 ?
Arnaud Héritier
Software Factory Manager
eXo platform - http://www.exoplatform.com
---
http://www.aheritier.net
2010/4/19 Tamás Cservenák
> +1
>
> On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 7:50 PM, Benjamin Bentmann <
> benjamin.bentm..
On Apr 19, 2010, at 12:19 PM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
> Just a question, without voicing an opinion: I notice the "beta". What
> is the meaning? Are there any plans of a schedule towards a 3.0 final?
>
When there's a long enough period where users don't report any serious issues
it will be 3.0.
If Stuart finishes the work it will go in.
I have 100% confidence in the ITs and that we'll find anything before users do
as a result of switching the container. We have had very few problems with
flipping Nexus from Plexus to Guice and Stuart was able to fix those very
quickly. Stuart is like
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 12:11 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
>
> On Apr 19, 2010, at 12:19 PM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
>
>> Just a question, without voicing an opinion: I notice the "beta". What
>> is the meaning? Are there any plans of a schedule towards a 3.0 final?
>>
>
> When there's a long enough pe
On Apr 19, 2010, at 3:41 PM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 12:11 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
>>
>> On Apr 19, 2010, at 12:19 PM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
>>
>>> Just a question, without voicing an opinion: I notice the "beta". What
>>> is the meaning? Are there any plans of a sche
On 20/04/2010, at 8:48 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> On Apr 19, 2010, at 3:41 PM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 12:11 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
>>>
>>> On Apr 19, 2010, at 12:19 PM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
>>>
Just a question, without voicing an opinion: I notice the "be
+1 works ok here.
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 2:34 PM, Stephen Connolly
wrote:
> +1
>
> On 19 April 2010 19:12, Jason van Zyl wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> Wee!
>>
>> On Apr 19, 2010, at 10:50 AM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
>>
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > We solved 39 issues:
>> >
>> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/
Ok thx.
I agree that we have a good tests coverage to be quiet to switch.
Is there something which could be integrated before 3.0 final ? I
remember I saw a twit from you several weeks ago about replacing the
dl/ul layer to use a non-jetty stuff.
Arnaud
On Tuesday, April 20, 2010, Jason van Zyl
16 matches
Mail list logo