Re: svn commit: r940613 - /maven/shared/trunk/maven-reporting-api/pom.xml

2010-05-04 Thread Lukas Theussl
why? -Lukas hbout...@apache.org wrote: Author: hboutemy Date: Mon May 3 20:47:38 2010 New Revision: 940613 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=940613&view=rev Log: downgrade doxia-sink-api to 1.0 Modified: maven/shared/trunk/maven-reporting-api/pom.xml Modified: maven/shared/trunk/

Re: is this expected behaviour?

2010-05-04 Thread James C. McPherson
On 5/05/10 12:16 PM, James C. McPherson wrote: On 5/05/10 12:00 PM, Martin Gainty wrote: extract-assembly: Unable to delete directory /opt/local means 1)the directory does not exist..so create it 2)give yourself delete access to the folder usually chown of the folder gives all perms

Re: is this expected behaviour?

2010-05-04 Thread James C. McPherson
On 5/05/10 11:56 AM, Brett Porter wrote: You should set M2_HOME to /opt/local/apache-maven-2.2.1. It used to check the env var was correct before starting - I'm not sure why it didn't in this case. Thanks Brett, I'll give that a whirl. To assuage my curiosity, could you clue me in on why M2

Re: is this expected behaviour?

2010-05-04 Thread Brett Porter
You should set M2_HOME to /opt/local/apache-maven-2.2.1. It used to check the env var was correct before starting - I'm not sure why it didn't in this case. On 05/05/2010, at 11:09 AM, James C. McPherson wrote: > > Greetings one-n-all, > I pulled down the maven 2.2.1 source so I could build it

is this expected behaviour?

2010-05-04 Thread James C. McPherson
Greetings one-n-all, I pulled down the maven 2.2.1 source so I could build it into an OpenSolaris package, and then use it with a project that I'm lurking on. I don't install tools like this to my homedir, because I make sure that build tools are commonly available on my systems. I install my

Re: svn commit: r940318 - in /maven/plugins/branches/maven-site-plugin-3.x/src: main/java/org/apache/maven/plugins/site/ main/java/org/apache/maven/plugins/site/webapp/ test/java/org/apache/maven/plug

2010-05-04 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
Le mardi 04 mai 2010, Dennis Lundberg a écrit : > Hi, > > This is all great stuff, but we currently have two codebases to manage: > trunk and this branch. It would be good if refactorings like these could > wait until we have only one codebase to manage. I guess that you are not > planning to back

Re: Julia Antonova/Tumlare is out of office.

2010-05-04 Thread Brett Porter
On 05/05/2010, at 4:19 AM, John Casey wrote: > I thought we'd unsubscribed her before...at least once. Yeah, I'm pretty sure I did. - Brett -- Brett Porter br...@apache.org http://brettporter.wordpress.com/ - To unsubscri

Re: Julia Antonova/Tumlare is out of office.

2010-05-04 Thread Barrie Treloar
On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 6:46 AM, lukewpatterson wrote: > > > Tim O'Brien wrote: >> >> Ok, I'm glad we were all prepared for this.   I've made sure to update >> the Maven FAQ to include this info for others that might be confused: >> >> http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVENUSER/FAQs-1#FAQs-1-IsJuli

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Plugin Tools 2.6 and Maven Plugins Parent POM 18

2010-05-04 Thread Stephen Connolly
+1 -Stephen On 1 May 2010 15:30, Benjamin Bentmann wrote: > Hi, > > We solved 6 issues: > > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11139&version=16416 > > There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: > > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&pid=

Re: svn commit: r940318 - in /maven/plugins/branches/maven-site-plugin-3.x/src: main/java/org/apache/maven/plugins/site/ main/java/org/apache/maven/plugins/site/webapp/ test/java/org/apache/maven/plug

2010-05-04 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Hi, This is all great stuff, but we currently have two codebases to manage: trunk and this branch. It would be good if refactorings like these could wait until we have only one codebase to manage. I guess that you are not planning to backport this to trunk. On 2010-05-02 22:45, hbout...@apache.or

[ANN] Maven Javadoc Plugin version 2.7 Released

2010-05-04 Thread John Casey
The Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Maven Javadoc Plugin, version 2.7 This plugin uses the Javadoc tool to generate javadocs for your project. http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-javadoc-plugin/ You should specify the version in your project's plugin configuration: or

[ANN] Maven PMD Plugin 2.5 Released

2010-05-04 Thread Hervé Boutemy
he Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Maven PMD Plugin, version 2.5 The PMD plugin allows you to automatically run the PMD code analysis tool on your project's source code and generate a site report with its results. It also supports the separate Copy/Paste Detector tool (or C

Re: Incompatibilities between maven 2.2.1 and 3.0.0-beta-1

2010-05-04 Thread Stephen Connolly
looks like we're stuck walking the tree again (versions-maven-plugin also) On 4 May 2010 19:12, Benjamin Bentmann wrote: > Brian Fox wrote: > > MavenProject.getOriginalModel() for the raw model, i.e. as read from the >>> mere pom.xml. >>> >> >> The current pom only or with inheritence? >> > > T

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Maven PMD plugin version 2.5

2010-05-04 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
Hi, The vote has passed with the following result : +1 (binding): Benjamin, Jason, Arnaud, Olivier, Hervé? lukas, Benjalin +1 (non binding): Jeff I will promote the artifacts to the central repo. Regards, Hervé - To unsubscrib

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Plugin Tools 2.6 and Maven Plugins Parent POM 18

2010-05-04 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
+1 lø., 01.05.2010 kl. 16.30 +0200, skrev Benjamin Bentmann: > Hi, > > We solved 6 issues: > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11139&version=16416 > > There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&pid=1

Re: Julia Antonova/Tumlare is out of office.

2010-05-04 Thread Jesse McConnell
but she brings us together every year...united in amusement -- jesse mcconnell jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 13:19, John Casey wrote: > I thought we'd unsubscribed her before...at least once. > > Anyway, I'm +1, and if we can _ban_ her, even better. > > On 5/4/10 2:01 PM, Br

Re: Julia Antonova/Tumlare is out of office.

2010-05-04 Thread John Casey
I thought we'd unsubscribed her before...at least once. Anyway, I'm +1, and if we can _ban_ her, even better. On 5/4/10 2:01 PM, Brian Fox wrote: Clearly she doesn't read this list or she would have known by now to stop doing that. Should we just unsub her? On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 1:57 PM, Mart

Re: Incompatibilities between maven 2.2.1 and 3.0.0-beta-1

2010-05-04 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
Brian Fox wrote: MavenProject.getOriginalModel() for the raw model, i.e. as read from the mere pom.xml. The current pom only or with inheritence? The current POM only. Benjamin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ma

Re: Julia Antonova/Tumlare is out of office.

2010-05-04 Thread Tim O'Brien
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 1:01 PM, Brian Fox wrote: > Clearly she doesn't read this list or she would have known by now to > stop doing that. Should we just unsub her? > (non-binding) +1 > On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 1:57 PM, Martin Gainty wrote: >> >> i dont know if they have internet there yet but yo

Re: Julia Antonova/Tumlare is out of office.

2010-05-04 Thread Paul Benedict
She probably deletes all emails when she returns. As they say around some offices, "if it was really important, they will follow back up." Saves checking hundreds -- or thousands -- of emails once returning from vacation. - To uns

Re: Julia Antonova/Tumlare is out of office.

2010-05-04 Thread Wayne Fay
I've been wondering that myself for months... nay years now. ;-) On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 1:01 PM, Brian Fox wrote: > Clearly she doesn't read this list or she would have known by now to > stop doing that. Should we just unsub her? > > On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 1:57 PM, Martin Gainty wrote: >> >> i

Re: Incompatibilities between maven 2.2.1 and 3.0.0-beta-1

2010-05-04 Thread Brian Fox
> MavenProject.getOriginalModel() for the raw model, i.e. as read from the > mere pom.xml. The current pom only or with inheritence? The latter would usually be more handy. In the enforcer I would need to get the original poms, but having inheritence baked in would save me from walking the tree an

Re: Julia Antonova/Tumlare is out of office.

2010-05-04 Thread Brian Fox
Clearly she doesn't read this list or she would have known by now to stop doing that. Should we just unsub her? On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 1:57 PM, Martin Gainty wrote: > > i dont know if they have internet there yet but you *might* want to check her > dacha outside of moscow > > Martin Gainty > ___

RE: Julia Antonova/Tumlare is out of office.

2010-05-04 Thread Martin Gainty
i dont know if they have internet there yet but you *might* want to check her dacha outside of moscow Martin Gainty __ Verzicht und Vertraulichkeitanmerkung Diese Nachricht ist vertraulich. Sollten Sie nicht der vorgesehene Empfaenger sein, so bit

Re: Julia Antonova/Tumlare is out of office.

2010-05-04 Thread Wayne Fay
Tim, this is a great addition to the FAQs! I especially like the calendar going back a few years. ;-) Wayne On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 2:33 PM, Tim O'Brien wrote: > Ok, I'm glad we were all prepared for this.   I've made sure to update > the Maven FAQ to include this info for others that might be c

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Maven Javadoc Plugin version 2.7

2010-05-04 Thread John Casey
This vote has passed with the following +1 votes: +1 binding: John, Herve, Vincent S., Benjamin, Lukas +1 non-binding: Evgeny I'll promote the artifacts, publish the site updates, and tidy up the rest. Thanks, -john On 4/30/10 3:09 PM, John Casey wrote: Hi, We solved 7 issues: http://jira.c

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Javadoc Plugin version 2.7

2010-05-04 Thread John Casey
FWIW, I found the examples page I had put in for the dependency-based javadoc aggregation: http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-javadoc-plugin-2.7/examples/aggregate-dependency-sources.html On 5/1/10 10:56 AM, Vincent Siveton wrote: Hi John, I guess you could easily create some APT files i

Re: Compilation problem with Maven 3.0-beta-1

2010-05-04 Thread Henrique Prange
Hi Jason, On 01/05/10 13:54, Jason van Zyl wrote: On May 1, 2010, at 10:31 AM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote: Jason van Zyl wrote: Didn't Henrique just remove the packaging element from the component definition of the artifact handler to get this to work? In fact, I have also changed the plu

Re: Incompatibilities between maven 2.2.1 and 3.0.0-beta-1

2010-05-04 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
David Jencks wrote: 1. We were calling org.apache.maven.artifact Artifact; //from dependencyNode.getRelatedArtifact() if not null, otherwise dependencyNode.getArtifact() artifact.getVersionRange().getRecommendedVersion().toString() [...] artifact.getVersionRange() is now null on, apparently, n

Re: Incompatibilities between maven 2.2.1 and 3.0.0-beta-1

2010-05-04 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
David Jencks wrote: 2. Plugin plugin = (Plugin) project.getModel().getBuild().getPluginsAsMap().get("org.apache.geronimo.buildsupport:car-maven-plugin"); plugin.getExecutions() has changed. [...] Now it contains elements for every mojo in the plugin. MavenProject.getModel() is