This new feature is really cool: it justifies a release.
Skip (JXR-86) should be accessible.
But if you ask for my wish-list, I'd like JXR-15, JXR-63.
And if Vincent is around, having a look at JXR-54 and his work in sandbox a
few years ago, which was not pushed to trunk I don't know why.
Thank y
I went on a developmental stroll through JXR at the instigation of
Hervé's call to arms. I suppose that the next step would be a release
so that he or someone could put the aggregate stuff to work. Anyone
else want to put do anything else? I suppose that 'skip' would be
trivial, I should at least d
Tony Chemit wrote:
On Thu, 7 Jul 2011 21:22:43 +0200
Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
I forgot we had this great Jenkins instance with lots of OSes and
configuration combinations, and improved ITs to cover a lot of cases
(more than +50% over 3.0-beta-3)
Then I'm now confident that we can release a good
On 12/07/2011, at 8:13 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> Brett,
>
> I'm not working on a problem -- well, to be exact, there was an NPE in
> the code in question, but that's fixed. I happened to see this code
> while working on 'aggregate' and I wondered if it was entirely
> satisfactory.
Cool - it
Brett,
I'm not working on a problem -- well, to be exact, there was an NPE in
the code in question, but that's fixed. I happened to see this code
while working on 'aggregate' and I wondered if it was entirely
satisfactory.
--benson
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 3:03 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
>
> On 11
Hello,
Should be better in the future. I have fixed the repo id used for
deploying snapshots.
2011/7/12 Benson Margulies :
> I think this job needs some help:
>
> https://builds.apache.org/job/maven-jxr/6/console
>
> -
> To unsubs
+1
It was said several times and many people are agree to simplify / cleanup /
improve our web site
If someone is volunteer :-)
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 9:06 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
> I think you'll find in the archives of this list plenty of agreement and
> thoughts about how to change /
I think you'll find in the archives of this list plenty of agreement and
thoughts about how to change / simplify. It just needs someone willing to start
:)
- Brett
On 09/07/2011, at 8:24 PM, Robert Scholte wrote:
>
>
> I agree with Tim here. Compare the maven[1] and gradle[2] homepages. The
On 11/07/2011, at 9:04 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
>>
>> Why is it doing this at all?
>
> Jörg,
>
> Honestly, I have no idea -- I just happened to spot it on the way by.
> And when I thought some more, I realized that my question is
> mis-stated. The issue here isn't classpath, it's more relat
