Hi,
try with this svn path
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/sandbox/trunk/plugins/maven-scm-publish-plugin/
2012/5/19 Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com:
Hello all,
is this plugin sill in development?
http://maven.apache.org/sandbox/plugins/asf-svnpubsub-plugin/
I tried to find
I'd appreciate spinning a release of this. When staged I can test on
my real corporate use cases. Should be very similar to my test on the
snapshot though, so I don't expect any issues.
/Anders
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Anders Hammar and...@hammar.net wrote:
It's not that easy. The
Thanks for the polished ping :-)
I will take care of that this week.
2012/5/21 Anders Hammar and...@hammar.net:
I'd appreciate spinning a release of this. When staged I can test on
my real corporate use cases. Should be very similar to my test on the
snapshot though, so I don't expect any
2012/5/21 Brett Porter br...@apache.org:
On 21/05/2012, at 3:45 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
here, the end-user is a plugin developer, then someone who should be able to
create a (Plexus) component when necessary
Yes, I liked @Component too but as soon as you write a component and inject
Hi,
I'd like to release Apache Maven Invoker plugin 1.6.
We fixed 16 issues ( release notes: http://s.apache.org/MINVOKER-1.6 )
Staging repository:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-104/
Staging site: http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-invoker-plugin-1.6/
(wait sync)
+1 non-binding
Regards,
Garvin LeClaire
garvin.lecla...@gmail.com
On May 21, 2012, at 9:51 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to release Apache Maven Invoker plugin 1.6.
We fixed 16 issues ( release notes: http://s.apache.org/MINVOKER-1.6 )
Staging repository:
On 21/05/2012, at 9:03 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
2012/5/21 Brett Porter br...@apache.org:
On 21/05/2012, at 3:45 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
here, the end-user is a plugin developer, then someone who should be able to
create a (Plexus) component when necessary
Yes, I liked @Component too
2012/5/21 Brett Porter br...@apache.org:
On 21/05/2012, at 9:03 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
2012/5/21 Brett Porter br...@apache.org:
On 21/05/2012, at 3:45 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
here, the end-user is a plugin developer, then someone who should be able
to
create a (Plexus) component when
Nothing is done at maven execution time (as we will need some core
changes for that) and IMHO this could slow execution.
This depends on whether we do a full ClassPath scan or still have some parts in
the XML.
With e.g. CDI it would also be possible to use the existing plugin.xml and
provide
On 5/21/12 7:03 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
2012/5/21 Brett Porterbr...@apache.org:
On 21/05/2012, at 3:45 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
here, the end-user is a plugin developer, then someone who should be able to
create a (Plexus) component when necessary
Yes, I liked @Component too but as soon as
I understand the point
but I don't think reworking javadoc tags too much now is a good idea: javadoc
tags are not easy to check when using them
instead, it is important to carefully choose java 5 annotations, which are
checked at compile time, with IDE completion when writing source
@Parameter(
that was my point:
for Plexus annotations, @Component is on the component itself (I mean
org.codehaus.plexus.component.annotations.Component [1])
but for Maven Plugin Tools, @Component is on the injection point
(org.apache.maven.plugins.annotations.Component [2])
same annotation name at
MSHADE-115 reports the unpleasant consequences of putting the
dependency-reduced-pom into the basedir instead of target.
I'm working on a fix. The fix needs a function that can relativize one
pathname to another. I'm surprised that there doesn't seem to be one
of those lying about ... is there
Le lundi 21 mai 2012 20:58:08 Mark Struberg a écrit :
Nothing is done at maven execution time (as we will need some core
changes for that) and IMHO this could slow execution.
This depends on whether we do a full ClassPath scan or still have some parts
in the XML. With e.g. CDI it would
On 05/11/2012 04:15 AM, Kristian Rosenvold wrote:
I have been considering fixing classworlds and m3 core to exploit the
parallel classloading abilities of java 7. The idea would be to load
plugin classloaders in parallel to increase performance.
You can load classes in multiple threads in
in J7 the lock is done by loaded class where it was synchronized on the
classloader itself before.
- Romain
2012/5/22 Jesse Glick jesse.gl...@oracle.com
On 05/11/2012 04:15 AM, Kristian Rosenvold wrote:
I have been considering fixing classworlds and m3 core to exploit the
parallel
On 22/05/2012, at 6:37 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
I understand the point
but I don't think reworking javadoc tags too much now is a good idea: javadoc
tags are not easy to check when using them
instead, it is important to carefully choose java 5 annotations, which are
checked at compile
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=truemode=hidejqlQuery=project+%3D+MSHADE+AND+fixVersion+%3D+%221.6%22
Looks clear.
On 22/05/2012, at 9:08 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
Version 1.6 wasn't marked released, and 1.7 wasn't created, until just
now. So, if anyone closed any
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/204784/how-to-construct-a-relative-path-in-java-from-two-absolute-paths-or-urls
http://plexus.codehaus.org/plexus-utils/apidocs/org/codehaus/plexus/util/FileUtils.html#resolveFile(java.io.File,
java.lang.String)
I was sure there was one around called
Brett, I wrote the code today.
On May 21, 2012, at 6:51 PM, Brett Porter br...@apache.org wrote:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/204784/how-to-construct-a-relative-path-in-java-from-two-absolute-paths-or-urls
On 22/05/2012, at 12:22 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
Brett, I wrote the code today.
I saw that... but didn't you send this afterwards? I thought you were looking
for a way to trim it back again to avoid extra maintenance/risk of os-specific
bugs.
On May 21, 2012, at 6:51 PM, Brett Porter
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 10:58 PM, Brett Porter br...@apache.org wrote:
On 22/05/2012, at 12:22 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
Brett, I wrote the code today.
I saw that... but didn't you send this afterwards? I thought you were looking
for a way to trim it back again to avoid extra
On 22/05/2012, at 1:35 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 10:58 PM, Brett Porter br...@apache.org wrote:
On 22/05/2012, at 12:22 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
Brett, I wrote the code today.
I saw that... but didn't you send this afterwards? I thought you were
looking
23 matches
Mail list logo
