Re: [VOTE] formally end support for Maven 1

2013-03-04 Thread Arnaud Héritier
It was with a great pleasure I released Maven 1.1 almost 6 years ago http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/maven-announce/200706.mbox/%3c262c6c680706250248m46d1b285i1792a19fb7c2b...@mail.gmail.com%3E As you noticed it was so perfect that it didn't require any maintenance ;-) The king is dead lon

[VOTE] Apache Maven PMD Plugin 3.1

2013-03-04 Thread Olivier Lamy
Hi, I'd like to release PMD Plugin 3.1. It's a bug fix release. We fixed 1 issue: https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=18929&styleName=Text&projectId=11140&Create=Create Staging repository: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-325/ Staged site: http://mave

Re: The next major release of Maven: 4.0.0

2013-03-04 Thread Arnaud Héritier
I have no more time to spend on maven sadly. I pushed here some things I would like to see in a new major version https://gist.github.com/olamy/5081375 And for sure as an end user I have really nothing to do about SLF4J, aether, Guice or any other component used within the product. I understand ver

Re: The next major release of Maven: 4.0.0

2013-03-04 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Mar 4, 2013, at 2:52 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > some more personal thoughts and questions to make myself an opinion > > - about determining whether Aether API is biased or not: there was an > argument > for not developing Aether in Maven that was "Aether API will be more generic > to cove

Re: The next major release of Maven: 4.0.0

2013-03-04 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Mar 3, 2013, at 2:43 PM, Stuart McCulloch wrote: > On 3 Mar 2013, at 14:16, Jason van Zyl wrote: >> Hi, >> >> No one seems to object to doing a release with the SLF4J support without the >> isolation so I wanted to discuss what happens when we integrate Eclipse >> Aether and suggest an alt

Re: Desupport Maven 1

2013-03-04 Thread Rahul Thakur
+1 On 2/28/2013 1:15 AM, Stéphane Nicoll wrote: +1 Sent from my iPhone On 27 Feb 2013, at 19:34, Benson Margulies wrote: I think it's long overtime for us to officially disclaim support for Maven 1. - To unsubscribe, e-ma

Re: security with Maven

2013-03-04 Thread Manfred Moser
This page is completely out of date. Nowadays you would use a repository manager like Nexus and have most of the issue taken care of.. manfred > Hi all, > > Many projects still don't use maven that for me is the best build > tool, but have several problems with security, a summary in > http://doc

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Changes Plugin version 2.9

2013-03-04 Thread Olivier Lamy
+1 2013/3/1 Benson Margulies : > Hi, > > We solved some issues: > > ** Bug > * [MCHANGES-276] - TracDownloader does not set issue key to ticket id > * [MCHANGES-293] - XML Parser error backtraces from, presumably, > malformed JIRA responses > * [MCHANGES-299] - ClassNotFoundException w

[VOTE] Release Maven Indexer 5.1.1

2013-03-04 Thread Tamás Cservenák
Hi, We solved 2 issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12112&version=18988 There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: http://jira.codehaus.org/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20MINDEXER%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Open%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC Staging repo:https:

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven PMD Plugin 3.1

2013-03-04 Thread Robert Scholte
Let's try to follow the version-convention: if it's only a bugfix, it should be 3.0.1 Robert Op Mon, 04 Mar 2013 11:59:42 +0100 schreef Olivier Lamy : Hi, I'd like to release PMD Plugin 3.1. It's a bug fix release. We fixed 1 issue: https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=1

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Changes Plugin version 2.9

2013-03-04 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
+1 Regards, Hervé Le vendredi 1 mars 2013 14:56:15 Benson Margulies a écrit : > Hi, > > We solved some issues: > > ** Bug > * [MCHANGES-276] - TracDownloader does not set issue key to ticket id > * [MCHANGES-293] - XML Parser error backtraces from, presumably, > malformed JIRA response

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Indexer 5.1.1

2013-03-04 Thread Igor Fedorenko
+1 -- Regards, Igor On 2013-03-04 12:21 PM, Tamás Cservenák wrote: Hi, We solved 2 issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12112&version=18988 There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: http://jira.codehaus.org/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20MINDEXER%20AND%20

Re: [VOTE] formally end support for Maven 1

2013-03-04 Thread Dennis Lundberg
+1 from me On 2013-03-02 16:18, Benson Margulies wrote: > Based on the sentiment on the discussion thread, I call a formal vote > to end support for Maven 1.x. This is a vote to: > > 1: Remove maven 1 release materials from the primary distribution > area, leaving them only on the archive. > > 2

Re: [VOTE] formally end support for Maven 1

2013-03-04 Thread Wayne Fay
My +1. On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 9:18 AM, Benson Margulies wrote: > Based on the sentiment on the discussion thread, I call a formal vote > to end support for Maven 1.x. This is a vote to: > > 1: Remove maven 1 release materials from the primary distribution > area, leaving them only on the archive

Re: svn commit: r1452051 - in /maven/doxia/doxia-sitetools/trunk/doxia-decoration-model: pom.xml src/main/java/org/apache/maven/doxia/site/decoration/inheritance/DefaultDecorationModelInheritanceAssem

2013-03-04 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Hi Olivier, Previously I aligned the model versions with the product versions. This commit doesn't follow that path. Unless you plan for the next version of doxia-sitetools to be 1.3.1, then I suggest changing the model version to 1.4.0. On 2013-03-03 16:06, ol...@apache.org wrote: > Author: olam

Re: Trade mark attribution in project sites with fluido skin.....

2013-03-04 Thread Olivier Lamy
Have a look at here http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/archiva/site/src/site/site.xml 2013/3/4 Kristian Rosenvold : > It turns out the missing trade marks from the surefire site > (http://maven.apache.org/surefire/maven-surefire-plugin/) are because > the attributions seem to be hard coded into the

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven PMD Plugin 3.1

2013-03-04 Thread Olivier Lamy
agree. So vote cancel. 2013/3/4 Robert Scholte : > Let's try to follow the version-convention: if it's only a bugfix, it should > be 3.0.1 > > Robert > > Op Mon, 04 Mar 2013 11:59:42 +0100 schreef Olivier Lamy : > >> Hi, >> I'd like to release PMD Plugin 3.1. >> It's a bug fix release. >> We fixed

[VOTE] Apache Maven PMD Plugin 3.0.1

2013-03-04 Thread Olivier Lamy
Hi, I'd like to release PMD Plugin 3.0.1. It's a bug fix release. We fixed 1 issue: https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=18929&styleName=Text&projectId=11140&Create=Create Staging repository: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-328/ Staged site: http://ma

Re: svn commit: r1452051 - in /maven/doxia/doxia-sitetools/trunk/doxia-decoration-model: pom.xml src/main/java/org/apache/maven/doxia/site/decoration/inheritance/DefaultDecorationModelInheritanceAssem

2013-03-04 Thread Olivier Lamy
2013/3/4 Dennis Lundberg : > Hi Olivier, > > Previously I aligned the model versions with the product versions. This > commit doesn't follow that path. Unless you plan for the next version of > doxia-sitetools to be 1.3.1, then I suggest changing the model version > to 1.4.0. agree I just fixed tha

configuring maven profile to replace web.xml values

2013-03-04 Thread rr
I am trying to replace a attribute in my web.xml by using the maven replacer plugin but it seems to not be doing anything bec. when I look at my generated war file the web.xml contains the orginal attribute that I had wanted to replace - I only want to replace it during a specific build profile -