On Mar 3, 2013, at 2:43 PM, Stuart McCulloch <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 3 Mar 2013, at 14:16, Jason van Zyl wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> No one seems to object to doing a release with the SLF4J support without the 
>> isolation so I wanted to discuss what happens when we integrate Eclipse 
>> Aether and suggest an alternate release path.
>> 
>> SLF4J may cause some issues, but the introduction of Eclipse Aether is 
>> almost certainly going to cause issues. In Eclipse Aether some internal 
>> representations have been changed and it's not completely backward 
>> compatible.
> 
> Apart from the "org.sonatype.aether" -> "org.eclipse.aether" package rename, 
> is there an overview of the client-facing changes? (or perhaps a jdiff 
> report?) There are various other Aether users who'll also need to know how to 
> upgrade, so if this information isn't captured somewhere then it's worth 
> putting it on the Eclipse wiki. Even if it's not possible to bridge between 
> the old and new APIs then this information will help people migrate their 
> existing code.
> 

Here you go: http://wiki.eclipse.org/Aether/New_and_Noteworthy

Thanks,

Jason

----------------------------------------------------------
Jason van Zyl
Founder & CTO, Sonatype
Founder,  Apache Maven
http://twitter.com/jvanzyl
---------------------------------------------------------

The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral 
philosophy; that is, 
the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.

 -- John Kenneth Galbraith





Reply via email to