Re: [VOTE] Name our mascot: "Shotgun" vs "The Maven Owl"

Same here, good point. -gun. B Le 16 déc. 2014 22:46, "Matt Stephenson" a écrit : > A > > On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 2:39 AM, Stephen Connolly < > stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > After the run-off round, we are left with two names standing. > > > > This second vote will be a straight a

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Maven 3.2.5

+1 from Jason, Stephen, and Karl I'll promote the release, let it trickle out, and do the announcement tomorrow. On Dec 14, 2014, at 7:00 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote: > Hi, > > Time to release Maven 3.2.5! > > Here is a link to Jira with 22 issues resolved: > https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Rele

Re: MNG-1683: Zip packaging

On Wednesday, December 17, 2014, Paul Benedict wrote: > With regards to the mythical "assembly" type, just like other artifact > types, there is just only one primary artifact. Unlike running > assembly:single, which can output multiple files (.zip, .gz, etc.), the > output here will be just one

Re: MNG-1683: Zip packaging

With regards to the mythical "assembly" type, just like other artifact types, there is just only one primary artifact. Unlike running assembly:single, which can output multiple files (.zip, .gz, etc.), the output here will be just one artifact. Does anyone disagree with that perspective? If multipl

Re: [VOTE] Name our mascot: "Shotgun" vs "The Maven Owl"

A On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 2:39 AM, Stephen Connolly < stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote: > After the run-off round, we are left with two names standing. > > This second vote will be a straight and simple majority wins. > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours (with the potential of an

Re: Releases, Continuous Delivery and the Future

Great wording, although I really hope that nobody read 3.1.1 as 311, as if 3.1.2 (or 312) must be the next version. 3.2.0 was very valid. We're talking about major.minor.bugfix, each having its own value. Just like people saying that 0.99 would be the final draft. Why? 0.100 (or 0.999 if you

Re: [VOTE] Name our mascot: "Shotgun" vs "The Maven Owl"

B david jencks On Dec 15, 2014, at 5:39 AM, Stephen Connolly wrote: > After the run-off round, we are left with two names standing. > > This second vote will be a straight and simple majority wins. > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours (with the potential of an > extension until I

Re: [VOTE] Name our mascot: "Shotgun" vs "The Maven Owl"

On 15 Dec 2014, at 23:39, Stephen Connolly wrote: > [A]: Shotgun > [B]: The Maven Owl B. -- Mark Derricutt http://www.theoryinpractice.net http://plus.google.com/+MarkDerricutt http://twitter.com/talios http://facebook.com/mderricutt signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven 3.2.5

On 16 Dec 2014, at 2:38, Jason van Zyl wrote: > At first glance that does not look like a valid OSGi version: > > http://www.osgi.org/javadoc/r4v43/core/org/osgi/framework/Version.html > > In Tycho something like: > > 1.0-SNAPSHOT in the POM and 1.0.qualifier in the MANIFEST.MF would turn into >

Re: MNG-1683: Zip packaging

I like this approach as well. Having to have an attached artifact to have a zip or tar.gz with a meaningless pom or jar always seemed a bit weird. manfred Stephen Connolly wrote on 11.12.2014 07:14: > either mojo or a pull request against the assembly plugin (as you may need > to tweak the asse

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven 3.2.5

Whew. On Dec 16, 2014, at 7:09 AM, Sievers, Jan wrote: > thanks Stuart, I will fix the test project. > > With this, I can confirm all Tycho ITs are passing using staged maven 3.2.5. > > Regards, > Jan > >> -Original Message- >> From: Stuart McCulloch [mailto:mccu...@gmail.com] >> Sent

[GitHub] maven-site pull request: removed reference to maven-archetype-simp...

GitHub user tygerpatch opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/maven-site/pull/1 removed reference to maven-archetype-simple Based on the archetype-catalog.xml file in the maven-archetype repository, it appears that the archetype maven-archetype-simple no longer exists. Yo

Early Access builds for JDK 9 b42, JDK 8 b18 & JDK 7 b03 are available on java.net

Hi Robert & Kristian, Now that JDK 9 Early Access build images are modular [1], there is a fresh Early Access build for JDK 9 b42 available on java.net. The summary of changes are listed here In additi

RE: [VOTE] Release Maven 3.2.5

thanks Stuart, I will fix the test project. With this, I can confirm all Tycho ITs are passing using staged maven 3.2.5. Regards, Jan > -Original Message- > From: Stuart McCulloch [mailto:mccu...@gmail.com] > Sent: Dienstag, 16. Dezember 2014 12:31 > To: Maven Developers List > Subject:

RE: [VOTE] Release Maven 3.2.5

On 16 Dec 2014 10:45, "Sievers, Jan" wrote: > > I ran all Tycho ITs using the staged version. > I still see one error related to toolchains. > > The IT is using the toolchains.xml attached and fails the build with error below. > Not sure if that's a regression in toolchains or our test needs to be

RE: [VOTE] Release Maven 3.2.5

I ran all Tycho ITs using the staged version. I still see one error related to toolchains. The IT is using the toolchains.xml attached and fails the build with error below. Not sure if that's a regression in toolchains or our test needs to be adapted. I have extracted a small standalone sample f

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven 3.2.5

+1 On 14 December 2014 at 18:00, Jason van Zyl wrote: > > Hi, > > Time to release Maven 3.2.5! > > Here is a link to Jira with 22 issues resolved: > > https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=20819 > > Staging repo: > https://repository.apache.org/content/reposito

[GitHub] maven-surefire pull request: Run individual methods with junit48

GitHub user jhorstmann opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/75 Run individual methods with junit48 This implements a method filter for the junit 4.8 provider that supports the same syntax as discussed in