Re: last review of Reproducible Builds proposal

2019-10-10 Thread Christofer Dutz
Just a small question. I have been following this thread with great interest. I think this is going to be a big thing when it makes the changes available to the main maven system. So as far as I understand the core part will be a fixed timestamp which will then be used throughout the build by m

Re: last review of Reproducible Builds proposal

2019-10-10 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 10/10/2019 à 19:28, Hervé BOUTEMY a écrit : > the only little mis-interpretation is that it is a pure build information, > then I don't see why this property would appear in a consumer POM Thank you for the clarification, that makes perfectly sense. And I now see the benefit of using a proper

Re: last review of Reproducible Builds proposal

2019-10-10 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
Le jeudi 10 octobre 2019 17:17:07 CEST, vous avez écrit : > Hi Hervé, > > >> - We already have maven.build.timestamp [1], so I wonder whether it > >> should be maven.build.outputTimestap, too. Although one may argue that > >> this *output* timestamp is a property of the project being built, not >

[maven-compiler-plugin] Possibly bug: annotationProcessorPath assuming classifier=processor

2019-10-10 Thread Cristiano
Hello, I just faced a problem here using maven 3.6.1 and java11. The compiler-plugin is assuming the classifier of a declared annotationProcessorPath as "processor". I've set my pom using this: >     >     >     >     maven-compiler-plugin >    

Re: Surefire 3.0.0-M4 release?

2019-10-10 Thread Tibor Digana
I have to try to merge the fix because it avoids a situation when the VM hanged. It is very important for the users. The remaining fixes may go to M5. I will adjust Jira release notes, oki? I have time to cut the release, no problem. The only problem was to find some spare time for coding the fixes

Standard http proxy environment variable evaluation

2019-10-10 Thread FOD Economie - SPF Economie
Hello, By looking at this over the internet I don't find much informations. Apparently the sole reliable way to configure proxy usage is trough ".m2/settings.xml" which annoys me when using CI/CD and docker behind proxies. We do set standard environment variables for proxies in the builds that n

Re: Surefire 3.0.0-M4 release?

2019-10-10 Thread Olivier Lamy
We can release now 3.0.0-M4 and then release later with your remaining fixes/new features. As far I know we do not have a fix release content we can easily move the remaining fixes to a 3.0.0-M5 I'm happy to release it myself if you don't have time. On Thu, 10 Oct 2019 at 21:11, Tibor Digana wrot

Re: Surefire 3.0.0-M4 release?

2019-10-10 Thread Tibor Digana
I understood the wish from JUnit5 fans e.g. Olivier Lamy but still we have important fixes for the stability and it is hard to find new developers. I was thinking about this release/3.0.0-M4 and adding one more milestone too but there is fix on my PC that I have a problem to merge without new TCP/I