Re: Another take on [MRESOLVER-7] Download dependency POMs in parallel

Hi Tibor, It took a while (and a few attempts :)), but I've prepared a branch with a few independent minimalistic commits. It's still a work in progress(tests and comments are missing), but I would love to run some thoughts by you before I

Re: reviewing Maven Wrapper before releasing

ITs updated to run mvnw MWRAPPER-22 proven to require to reapply the fix: done (surprising that nobody found that bug in Wrapper 0.5.6 and previous for more than 2 years...) release ready to be done: I'll launch it tonight Regards, Hervé Le dimanche 12 décembre 2021, 19:05:33 CET Robert

Re: reviewing Maven Wrapper before releasing

Robert, I’m actually not sure what you are implying. Are you saying that you’re going to block the release until someone ports your tests over? Or you’re going to block the release of the separate wrapper? I don’t think anyone disagrees that the tests can be fully automated.I don’t think it’s

Re: reviewing Maven Wrapper before releasing

> > Yes, that is said, we have seen this with Maven 3.8.x recently, but we > can't change people. Let's get over with and just push a release. Let it > soak in and continue with bugfixes. > > +1

Re: reviewing Maven Wrapper before releasing

Am 2021-12-12 um 19:05 schrieb Robert Scholte: Jason, my point is that i DID write integration tests as part of the donation to better understand the code, improve the codebase and its reliability. While writing them I did find several issues, some caused because the scripts didn't get in

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Doxia Sitetools version 1.11.1

+1 niedz., 12 gru 2021, 19:23 użytkownik Tamás Cservenák napisał: > +1 > > On Sun, Dec 12, 2021, 18:42 Michael Osipov wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > We solved 3 issues: > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317320=12351046 > > > > There are still a couple of

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Doxia Sitetools version 1.11.1

+1 On Sun, Dec 12, 2021, 18:42 Michael Osipov wrote: > Hi, > > We solved 3 issues: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317320=12351046 > > There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Doxia Sitetools version 1.11.1

Am 2021-12-12 um 18:41 schrieb Michael Osipov: Hi, We solved 3 issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317320=12351046 There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Doxia Sitetools version 1.11.1

thank you for respinning this time, no problem found :) +1 Reproducible Build checked: reference build was done with JDK 8 on Windows Regards, Hervé Le dimanche 12 décembre 2021, 18:41:57 CET Michael Osipov a écrit : > Hi, > > We solved 3 issues: >

Re: reviewing Maven Wrapper before releasing

Jason, my point is that i DID write integration tests as part of the donation to better understand the code, improve the codebase and its reliability. While writing them I did find several issues, some caused because the scripts didn't get in sync with the Maven core scripts. So it is possible

[VOTE] Release Apache Maven Doxia Sitetools version 1.11.1

Hi, We solved 3 issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317320=12351046 There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%2012317320%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Open Staging repo:

Re: [DISCUSS] Move maven caching to an external repository

I've split git repos before and using filter-branch is the key to keep the desired and purge the rest. >From my notes, these two posts helped me: * https://docs.github.com/en/get-started/using-git/splitting-a-subfolder-out-into-a-new-repository *

Re: [DISCUSS] Move maven caching to an external repository

nice work done I published the result to https://maven.apache.org/ref/caching-LATEST/ now, on moving source to a separate Git repository, I did a basic test pushing to a new repository: https://github.com/hboutemy/maven-build-cache-extension this leads to getting quite a lot of Maven history

Re: reviewing Maven Wrapper before releasing

Clearly no one here disagrees with the goal of having robust testing for software that is made available to users. As to the timing of that testing being complete for the wrapper, to the satisfaction of those objecting to a release, I will argue. Do we wait four years for adequate testing? I’m

Re: reviewing Maven Wrapper before releasing

sure, having ITs is our best bet for maintenance, particularly with the OS- dependant scripts notice that with wrapper releases being back independent from Maven core releases, the impact of any issue is not definitive: newer releases of wrapper will fix bugs and permit new features for every

[GitHub] [maven-site-plugin] michael-o closed pull request #62: MSITE-876 require at least Maven 3.6.1

michael-o closed pull request #62: URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-site-plugin/pull/62 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [VOTE] [CANCELED] Release Apache Maven Doxia Sitetools version 1.11

Am 2021-12-12 um 10:05 schrieb Hervé BOUTEMY: sorry, -1 this releases pulls Doxia 1.11 instead of 1.11.1 see https://ci-maven.apache.org/job/Maven/job/maven-box/job/maven-doxia-sitetools/job/master/ The good news is that Doxia Sitetools 1.11.1 will use Doxia 1.11.1, which is easier to guess

Re: reviewing Maven Wrapper before releasing

Chiming in a little late, but here are my 2 cents nevertheless. I would not feel confident releasing something that we cannot test in an automated way. Not having an integration test suite means we don't know for sure if it works. And if we know it works and we change something, we're back to

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Doxia Sitetools version 1.11

sorry, -1 this releases pulls Doxia 1.11 instead of 1.11.1 see https://ci-maven.apache.org/job/Maven/job/maven-box/job/maven-doxia-sitetools/job/master/ The good news is that Doxia Sitetools 1.11.1 will use Doxia 1.11.1, which is easier to guess Regards, Hervé Le vendredi 10 décembre 2021,