There is a serious regression in the maven-javadoc-plugin: MJAVADOC-116. It
has been open for quite some time now, and has 21 votes. A test case is
attached to the issue.
I believe many users are forced to still use the 2.0 version as long as this
issue is open. The related MJAVADOC-111 has
Stephen Connolly wrote:
B
With the following proviso:
I'd like to see main Maven releases more often, and have those main
releases specify a suite of endorsed plugin versions for that Maven
release.
That way, if I want a stable reproducible build, I just continue to use
the
Hi everybody,
from a corporate user's point of view, I believe, the following points are
important:
1. Corporate users want to be completely decoupled from what's happening on
repo1. Many even don't want to proxy repo1 but instead manage their own
repository. This is especially true for build
Jason,
thanks a lot for your answer.
I did not want to suggest that every Maven user should be forced to work
decoupled from repo1. But currently it is much harder than it should be, and
this should be improved. And I do agree that the separation of the Maven
core and the plugins has its
Dear Maven committers,
there is an issue in JIRA to make the Javadoc-Plugin support running Javadoc
from a JDK other than the one in JAVA_HOME. This is necessary if you e.g.
run your build with JDK 1.4, because it's the default JDK in an
organization, and want to build some JDK 1.5 projects on
Emmanuel,
I've additionally filed the following issues that further improve the
usability and documentation of the ClearCase SCM provider:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SCM-289
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SCM-290
Is it possible to stage the new site somewhere?
Other ClearCase users
Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
I'll look at them, thanks. But for Maven-SCM diiscussion, I'd prefer to do
it on scm-dev@maven.apache.org
Oh, sorry, I wasn't aware that there's a scm-dev list. The reason is that I
am using nabble.com, and scm-dev doesn't seem to be listed there... I'll ask
the
Jason van Zyl-2 wrote:
Arne,
Do you have any plans for ClearCase UCM?
Jason.
No, sorry, I don't. I am doing this for a customer who is using ClearCase
SCM, but not UCM. Currently they use ClearCase dynamic views together with
scm-local. But they want to have the full ClearCase (SCM)
Emmanuel,
I filed the following issue. Could you please have a look at it:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SCM-288
Thanks
- Arne
Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
Emmanuel Venisse a écrit :
ArneD a écrit :
Hi Emmanuel,
after SCM-287 has been applied, I still see the following problem
Hi Emmanuel,
after SCM-287 has been applied, I still see the following problem with the
Maven/Continuum and ClearCase integration.
The ClearCase implementation of the checkout command for ClearCase creates a
ClearCase snapshot view. Such a snaphsot view is very similiar to a CVS or
Subversion
Hi Emmanuel and others,
I implemented the above mentioned feature. Please have a look at the patch,
and apply it. If you apply it, it would be great if you could deploy a new
maven-scm SNAPSHOT version to the apache snapshots repository as well.
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SCM-287
Thanks
-
11 matches
Mail list logo
