Re: 2.0.5 and MNG-2794

2007-02-12 Thread Trygve Laugstøl
I would like to see this additional requirement too. -- Trygve Kenney Westerhof wrote: Yup, I agree. but still the case where 2 matches are equally near should be solved; I think atm. this is either random or first/last-encountered-wins; this should be latest (so nearest wins, if equal

Re: 2.0.5 and MNG-2794

2007-02-12 Thread Vincent Siveton
Hope it will be in the next 2.0.6 Cheers, Vincent 2007/2/12, Trygve Laugstøl [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I would like to see this additional requirement too. -- Trygve Kenney Westerhof wrote: Yup, I agree. but still the case where 2 matches are equally near should be solved; I think atm. this

Re: 2.0.5 and MNG-2794

2007-02-12 Thread Fabrice Bellingard
Hi Jason, the aim of this particular test case I implemented was to reproduce the bug. I made it simple to show the issue, and I agree that if you use a class for compilation, you should specify it as a dependency in your POM. However, the problem I had when I found this issue was slightly

2.0.5 and MNG-2794

2007-02-11 Thread Jason van Zyl
Hi, After looking at MNG-2794 I don't think it's something we should fix change. The 2.0.4 release was working in a way contrary to our documentation in that the nearest with 2.0.4 was not being selected and it is with 2.0.5. So we either fix it and then it conflicts with what we

Re: 2.0.5 and MNG-2794

2007-02-11 Thread Brett Porter
Sounds right to me. Needs something mentioned in the announcement/ release notes, though. - Brett On 12/02/2007, at 9:25 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote: Hi, After looking at MNG-2794 I don't think it's something we should fix change. The 2.0.4 release was working in a way contrary to our

Re: 2.0.5 and MNG-2794

2007-02-11 Thread Kenney Westerhof
Yup, I agree. but still the case where 2 matches are equally near should be solved; I think atm. this is either random or first/last-encountered-wins; this should be latest (so nearest wins, if equal distance then fallback to latest). But this could go in at 2.0.6 IMHO. -- Kenney Brett

Re: 2.0.5 and MNG-2794

2007-02-11 Thread Rahul Thakur
+1 Yep, i guess this is going to become a FAQ on the list and on IRC :-) Rahul Brett Porter wrote: Sounds right to me. Needs something mentioned in the announcement/release notes, though. - Brett On 12/02/2007, at 9:25 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote: Hi, After looking at MNG-2794 I don't

Re: 2.0.5 and MNG-2794

2007-02-11 Thread Jörg Schaible
Hi Jason, Jason van Zyl wrote: Hi, After looking at MNG-2794 I don't think it's something we should fix change. The 2.0.4 release was working in a way contrary to our documentation in that the nearest with 2.0.4 was not being selected and it is with 2.0.5. So we either fix it and then