On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 1:02 AM, Brian Fox wrote:
>
> Ok, we'll cancel the oss.sonatype.org request, unless you still want
> us to host the repo for you. I left a comment on the upload request,
> we need the artifacts to be signed, everything else looks good.
cool
more generally, i know of a num
Ok, we'll cancel the oss.sonatype.org request, unless you still want
us to host the repo for you. I left a comment on the upload request,
we need the artifacts to be signed, everything else looks good.
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 11:15 PM, David Hook wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I think we now have a correctly s
Hi,
I think we now have a correctly setup repository that can be synced
with. I've added a jira issue:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MAVENUPLOAD-2479
For it to be tried out.
At the moment the repository just has the 1.43 provider jars in it, once
I've confirmed that's working and fixed an er
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 3:37 PM, Brian Fox wrote:
> ok create a "new project" issue here:
> https://issues.sonatype.org/browse/OSSRH and those interested in maintaining
> it can add a comment to the issue to get privs.
please take a quick look at
https://issues.sonatype.org/browse/OSSRH-39 and see
ok create a "new project" issue here:
https://issues.sonatype.org/browse/OSSRH and those interested in maintaining
it can add a comment to the issue to get privs.
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 7:30 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin <
robertburrelldon...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 3:18 PM, Brian
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 3:18 PM, Brian Fox wrote:
> If someone is interested in maintaining the poms and tracking their
> releases, we can set up a repository at oss.sonatype.org.
a lot of apache projects rely on bouncy castle releases for crypto.
i'd be willing to help maintain an off shore reposi
If someone is interested in maintaining the poms and tracking their
releases, we can set up a repository at oss.sonatype.org.
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 6:57 AM, Brian Fox wrote:
> Just don't use their stuff then, clearly they don't want to make it easy
> for users.
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 5:19
Just don't use their stuff then, clearly they don't want to make it easy for
users.
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 5:19 AM, Tim Pizey wrote:
> Hi Carlos,
>
> I passed what you said on to the Bouncy Castle guys, but they said:
>
> > It's pretty simple. We publish to our website. That's it. We don't
>
Hi Carlos,
I passed what you said on to the Bouncy Castle guys, but they said:
> It's pretty simple. We publish to our website. That's it. We don't
> particularly mind that other people might want to publish via Maven.
>
> The fact that others might want to use Maven is excellent, however w
You'd have to go through the Maven repository upload process described
in http://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-central-repository-upload.html
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 5:17 PM, Tim Pizey wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have asked the Bouncy Castle guys if they will push to a Maven Repository
> and they
> r
Hi,
I have asked the Bouncy Castle guys if they will push to a Maven Repository and
they
replied that they publish only to
http://www.bouncycastle.org/latest_releases.html
So could someone at the Maven end ensure that all those jars are synched with?
thanks
Tim
--
We are in dialogue.
11 matches
Mail list logo
