;> > propagated
> >> > > > to
> >> > > > > > >> > "java.util", nobody in the world care and nobody should
> see
> >> > as a
> >> > > > > > >> problem to
> >> > >
gt; >> > Universities would for instance implement only "java.lang"
>> and
>> > > > > embed
>> > > > > > it
>> > > > > > >> in
>> > > > > > >> > to JVM and develop a new programming lan
really did not help embedded systems and installations
> of
> > > > > > browsers.
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > >
Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: Building a Java9 project just using JDK9
Btw. Can be JRE/JDK configures after installation in terms not doing these
things and so that non-modular application would have access to java.se.ee
by default?
And second question, which would be cool feature to have, is some s
> > > >> > On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 8:51 AM, Enrico Olivelli <[hidden
> email]
> > > > <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5912520&i=4>
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> > wrote:
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >>
Btw. Can be JRE/JDK configures after installation in terms not doing these
things and so that non-modular application would have access to java.se.ee
by default?
And second question, which would be cool feature to have, is some script
which allows me to recreate a new JRE from installed one but mu
t; > > > >> > > This is based on a suggestion of Robert, its suggestion for
> the
> > > > >> > > javadoc plugin is working great with surefire too
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >&g
>> > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >
> org.apache.maven.plugins
> >
> > > >> > >
> &
--add-modules
> > >> > > ALL-SYSTEM
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > org.apache.maven.plugins
&g
Hi Gary,
as Robert already pointed out Maven can run fine on JDK 9...for a very
long time..
I'm working on support for jlink, jmod to support creation of run time
images with Maven simple (currently in its alpha states if this is
appropriate) ...which can be looked at the currenty example pr
On Tue, 15 Aug 2017 19:57:37 +0200, Gary Gregory
wrote:
I'm guessing that all the pain of doing this will not be fully known
until
Maven is Java 9-ified.
Not sure what you mean by this. Maven itself can run on Java 9, most
plugins work with Java 9, most Java 9 features are supported.
I'm guessing that all the pain of doing this will not be fully known until
Maven is Java 9-ified.
Gary
On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 10:16 AM, Enrico Olivelli
wrote:
> Il mar 15 ago 2017, 17:51 Gary Gregory ha
> scritto:
>
> > You will need the same tricks at runtime for the command line that Maven
Il mar 15 ago 2017, 17:51 Gary Gregory ha scritto:
> You will need the same tricks at runtime for the command line that Maven
> might hide at build time... :-( I guess hacks like --add-modules ALL-SYSTEM
> will become part of our daily grind...
>
Gary, I think you are right, scripts to launch ap
Il dom 13 ago 2017, 17:31 Tibor Digana ha
scritto:
> I found an issue. JDK printed this on std/out:
> WARNING: Using incubator modules: jdk.incubator.httpclient
>
IMHO This is because we are importing all system modules. Maybe importing
only java.se.ee would cover most of the cases.
I did not no
You will need the same tricks at runtime for the command line that Maven
might hide at build time... :-( I guess hacks like --add-modules ALL-SYSTEM
will become part of our daily grind...
Gary
On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 9:07 AM, Enrico Olivelli
wrote:
> Il mar 15 ago 2017, 00:03 Tibor Digana ha
>
Il mar 15 ago 2017, 00:03 Tibor Digana ha
scritto:
> I do not want to be too pessimistic but the inheritance of modules is
> crucial for all the world.
>
> The common sense tells me that I should not release Java 9 on September,
> 2017 unless Java EE application servers work properly.
>
> This wo
I do not want to be too pessimistic but the inheritance of modules is
crucial for all the world.
The common sense tells me that I should not release Java 9 on September,
2017 unless Java EE application servers work properly.
This would mean that JDBC is crucial as well as JAXB for JAX-WS/RS and
m
Il lun 14 ago 2017, 11:46 Tibor Digana ha
scritto:
> Hello Enrico,
>
> I fixed SUREFIRE-1403 and now Surefire works with Java 9.
> I need an approval for the Jira SUREFIRE-1403 for you and Robert. Thx in
> advance.
>
I will check as soon as I wil be back from vacation. Thank you very much.
For m
Hello Enrico,
I fixed SUREFIRE-1403 and now Surefire works with Java 9.
I need an approval for the Jira SUREFIRE-1403 for you and Robert. Thx in
advance.
I have added integration tests for Failsafe plugin, added documentation "
java9.md" and removed JAXB which is located in module *javax.xml.bind
Il dom 13 ago 2017, 17:31 Tibor Digana ha
scritto:
> I found an issue. JDK printed this on std/out:
> WARNING: Using incubator modules: jdk.incubator.httpclient
>
> It hapens after my test:
>
> import org.junit.Test;
>
> public class J9Test
> {
> @Test
> public void testMiscellaneousAPI()
I'll throw my 2c in here, too:
Java 9 runtime forces me to rewrite parts of my application because
non-root thread priority control is no longer available. Plenty of people
have relied on lines like this to achieve their desired behaviour:
java -jar -Xms128m -Xmx1024m *-XX:ThreadPriorityPolicy=42
I found an issue. JDK printed this on std/out:
WARNING: Using incubator modules: jdk.incubator.httpclient
It hapens after my test:
import org.junit.Test;
public class J9Test
{
@Test
public void testMiscellaneousAPI() throws java.sql.SQLException
{
System.out.println( "loaded
But why to add it? It's a hack. I do not use module-info.java and so there
is no reason to break the backwards compatibility.
This is no more about Maven. It is about entire Java world.
If we in Maven do it then everybody has to.
And I am sure that the voices says that Kotlin is better and Scala i
Is there a Maven way to add ALL-SYSTEM to everything? Using plugin specific
tags like below is going to be painful.
Gary
On Aug 13, 2017 07:30, "Tibor Digana" wrote:
> Hi @Enrico,
>
> I am very unhappy with Java 9 status and very afraid.
> I do not like the style how Oracle has changed Java to
Hi @Enrico,
I am very unhappy with Java 9 status and very afraid.
I do not like the style how Oracle has changed Java to Java 9 and forced
all the world to use additional effort to adapt to Oracle activities.
I am facing more unhappy Java development teams with Java 9 in the future.
For instance
I would like to share my current pom configuration which lets me to
build and test java8 apps on latest and greatest jdk9
This profile is activated when using jdk9.
This is based on a suggestion of Robert, its suggestion for the
javadoc plugin is working great with surefire too
jdk9
Hi,
yes I will do within this week...
Kind regards
Karl Heinz Marbaise
On 23/04/17 21:37, Enrico Olivelli wrote:
Thank you Robert,
I saw that you have merged my patch.
Is there any plan to release the new version of the war plugin?
Enrico
Il gio 13 apr 2017, 12:21 Paul Hammant ha scritto:
Thank you Robert,
I saw that you have merged my patch.
Is there any plan to release the new version of the war plugin?
Enrico
Il gio 13 apr 2017, 12:21 Paul Hammant ha scritto:
> >
> >
> >> I don't see any activity either, so my idea is to replace XStream, see
> > MWAR-397[1]
> >
>
> Just for
>
>
>> I don't see any activity either, so my idea is to replace XStream, see
> MWAR-397[1]
>
Just for the record, Jörg is working through the Java9 issues for XStream
presently - https://github.com/x-stream/xstream/commits/master
- Paul
Yes, I think that makes sense. Will do so.
Robert
On Wed, 12 Apr 2017 03:15:41 +0200, Hervé BOUTEMY
wrote:
Robert,
Should this war plugin be added to the Java 9 - Jigsaw Wiki page in the
plugins section?
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Java+9+-+Jigsaw
Regards,
Hervé
L
I have created the JIRA to better track my proposal
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MWAR-405
2017-04-12 3:15 GMT+02:00 Hervé BOUTEMY :
> Robert,
>
> Should this war plugin be added to the Java 9 - Jigsaw Wiki page in the
> plugins section?
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAV
Robert,
Should this war plugin be added to the Java 9 - Jigsaw Wiki page in the
plugins section?
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Java+9+-+Jigsaw
Regards,
Hervé
Le mardi 11 avril 2017, 10:14:12 CEST Enrico Olivelli a écrit :
> Thank you all for your quick answers
>
> @Robert
@Jörg
I have updated the PR with your proposal of registering only a bunch of
converters.
https://github.com/apache/maven-plugins/pull/112
It is working very well (with a very simple webapp) !
I think it is the most simple solution for the Java9 problem actually. It
does not require invasive code
Hi Enrico,
Enrico Olivelli wrote:
> Thank you all for your quick answers
>
> @Robert
> I have checked out the code and took a deeper look:
> the implementation of MWAR-397 is complex and will take some time, on the
> mid term I agree that it will an awesome solution
> https://issues.apache.org/j
Thank you all for your quick answers
@Robert
I have checked out the code and took a deeper look:
the implementation of MWAR-397 is complex and will take some time, on the
mid term I agree that it will an awesome solution
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MWAR-397
@Jörg
The option --permit-ill
Enrico Olivelli wrote:
> Il lun 10 apr 2017, 18:57 Karl Heinz Marbaise ha
> scritto:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 10/04/17 17:37, Enrico Olivelli wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> > I would like be able to build an existing project developed for java8
>> > by simple running Maven on jdk9.
>> >
>> > Actually it is not pos
Il lun 10 apr 2017, 22:32 Robert Scholte ha scritto:
> On Mon, 10 Apr 2017 22:23:27 +0200, Enrico Olivelli
> wrote:
>
> > Il lun 10 apr 2017, 18:57 Karl Heinz Marbaise ha
> > scritto:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On 10/04/17 17:37, Enrico Olivelli wrote:
> >> > Hi,
> >> > I would like be able to buil
On Mon, 10 Apr 2017 22:23:27 +0200, Enrico Olivelli
wrote:
Il lun 10 apr 2017, 18:57 Karl Heinz Marbaise ha
scritto:
Hi,
On 10/04/17 17:37, Enrico Olivelli wrote:
> Hi,
> I would like be able to build an existing project developed for java8
by
> simple running Maven on jdk9.
>
> Actual
Il lun 10 apr 2017, 18:57 Karl Heinz Marbaise ha
scritto:
> Hi,
>
> On 10/04/17 17:37, Enrico Olivelli wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I would like be able to build an existing project developed for java8 by
> > simple running Maven on jdk9.
> >
> > Actually it is not possible, I am aware of that and I am cur
Hi,
On 10/04/17 17:37, Enrico Olivelli wrote:
Hi,
I would like be able to build an existing project developed for java8 by
simple running Maven on jdk9.
Actually it is not possible, I am aware of that and I am currently
following all the news about Maven and Java9
What is not possible ? Do yo
Hi,
I would like be able to build an existing project developed for java8 by
simple running Maven on jdk9.
Actually it is not possible, I am aware of that and I am currently
following all the news about Maven and Java9
So I would like to "help" in order to "get things working" as Java9 now
reache
41 matches
Mail list logo