RE: Gathering proposals for 2.1

2007-09-04 Thread Brian E. Fox
I'll email the user list. -Original Message- From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2007 5:41 AM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: Gathering proposals for 2.1 On 3 Sep 07, at 6:30 PM 3 Sep 07, Brian E. Fox wrote: > I'm leaning tha

Re: Gathering proposals for 2.1

2007-09-04 Thread John Casey
+1 -j On Sep 3, 2007, at 9:20 PM, Brian E. Fox wrote: Now that we're getting close to a 2.1 alpha-1 release, it's time to really look closely at what is going to be included in the final release. In my opinion, it's been far too long between 2.0 and 2.1 (almost 2 years) and we need to get a st

Re: Gathering proposals for 2.1

2007-09-04 Thread Jason van Zyl
ter. -Original Message- From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 03, 2007 9:27 PM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: Gathering proposals for 2.1 On 04/09/2007, at 11:20 AM, Brian E. Fox wrote: WDYT? +Integer.MAX_VALUE I've got all the ones in that

RE: Gathering proposals for 2.1

2007-09-03 Thread Brian E. Fox
lse, it provides the motivation now to get some proposals started for 2.2. -Original Message- From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 03, 2007 9:27 PM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: Gathering proposals for 2.1 On 04/09/2007, at 11:20 AM, Brian E

Re: Gathering proposals for 2.1

2007-09-03 Thread Brett Porter
On 04/09/2007, at 11:20 AM, Brian E. Fox wrote: WDYT? +Integer.MAX_VALUE I've got all the ones in that I care about, and my previous mail highlights the ones I think we should do. Cheers, Brett -- Brett Porter - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Blog: http://www.devzuz.org/blogs/bporter/

Gathering proposals for 2.1

2007-09-03 Thread Brian E. Fox
Now that we're getting close to a 2.1 alpha-1 release, it's time to really look closely at what is going to be included in the final release. In my opinion, it's been far too long between 2.0 and 2.1 (almost 2 years) and we need to get a stable release out sooner rather than later. I think that we