I have one specific request for new POM model.
element should allow the combine attribute. I am fine with
the same behavior and names that are on plugin configuration elements.
Above construct would allow switching resource folders with profiles,
instead of default merging.
Can anyone add it t
I see namespaces as useful in distinguishing 'core maven' content from
content for consumption by other tools, like m2e.
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 7:38 PM, Jesse Glick wrote:
> On 08/02/2011 08:52 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
>>
>> Adding explicit elements next to xs:any is a far more user-friendly
>
On 08/02/2011 08:39 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
The schema is being generated from the Modello model so if you see things that
are incorrect...
For the record, XsdGenerator.java explains:
// Usually, would only do this if the field is not "required", but due to
inheritance, it may be
// present
On 08/02/2011 08:52 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
Adding explicit elements next to xs:any is a far more user-friendly
extensibility mechanism than creating a hodgepodge of namespaces and
prefixes.
Agreed. But if ease of hand editing trumps validation and other tool support,
do you really want to
d Héritier wrote:
>
> > From: Arnaud Héritier
> > Subject: Re: More POM5 writing
> > To: "Maven Developers List"
> > Date: Tuesday, August 2, 2011, 1:32 PM
> > No Jason moved it some months ago
> > with plexus(*) to sonatype github account
> > I
that's bad news. Why not pull them back?
codehaus has a nice git hosting service too...
I don't like to get another area of troubles...
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Tue, 8/2/11, Arnaud Héritier wrote:
> From: Arnaud Héritier
> Subject: Re: More POM5 writing
> To: "Maven
aus project?
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
> --- On Tue, 8/2/11, Jason van Zyl wrote:
>
> > From: Jason van Zyl
> > Subject: Re: More POM5 writing
> > To: "Maven Developers List"
> > Date: Tuesday, August 2, 2011, 12:39 PM
> >
> > On Aug 2,
Jesse,
I don't agree with your analysis.
My view is as follows:
1) POM5 should have strategically located xs:any and xs:anyAttribute
elements that give tools fair warning of future extensions. I wish
POM4 had them, but such is life. As things are, the community seems in
general to be comfortable
Just wondering about the sonatype github URL. Isn't modello still a codehaus
project?
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Tue, 8/2/11, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> From: Jason van Zyl
> Subject: Re: More POM5 writing
> To: "Maven Developers List"
> Date: Tuesday, August 2, 2011, 1
On Aug 2, 2011, at 8:00 AM, Jesse Glick wrote:
> Worse, Maven seems to have a different idea of what valid content is than the
> schema says. For example, the schema says minOccurs="0" ...> but Maven will report "'modelVersion' is missing." as a
> fatal error. Certainly there will be some sema
On 07/31/2011 05:12 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Moving+forward+with+the+POM+data+model
"It would [...] be a bad idea to try to use namespaces as a versioning technique." - if you want to allow Schema validation of the entire POM, I think you hav
By popular request, I've expanded
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Moving+forward+with+the+POM+data+model
(and changed its name). It now reflects our recent reflections on
attributes, plus some thoughts on namespaces.
Please break out your darts and start throwing.
--
12 matches
Mail list logo
