Re: [proposal] plugin oversight

2005-08-16 Thread Rinku
List' dev@maven.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 9:11 AM Subject: RE: [proposal] plugin oversight -Original Message- From: Eric Pugh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: lundi 15 août 2005 23:06 To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: [proposal] plugin oversight +1 I think

Re: [proposal] plugin oversight

2005-08-16 Thread Carlos Sanchez
:06 To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: [proposal] plugin oversight +1 I think that this is key. It is also a good way to distribute the work, and incentivise people... As long as some people don't end up with the garbage can! I think it's better to say these plugins need

Re: [proposal] plugin oversight

2005-08-16 Thread Jason van Zyl
] Sent: lundi 15 août 2005 23:06 To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: [proposal] plugin oversight +1 I think that this is key. It is also a good way to distribute the work, and incentivise people... As long as some people don't end up with the garbage can! I think it's

Re: [proposal] plugin oversight

2005-08-15 Thread Eric Pugh
+1 I think that this is key. It is also a good way to distribute the work, and incentivise people... As long as some people don't end up with the garbage can! I think it's better to say these plugins need adoption then just to assign them all to one person. Eric On Aug 14, 2005, at

RE: [proposal] plugin oversight

2005-08-15 Thread Vincent Massol
-Original Message- From: Eric Pugh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: lundi 15 août 2005 23:06 To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: [proposal] plugin oversight +1 I think that this is key. It is also a good way to distribute the work, and incentivise people... As long