ous ne pouvons accepter aucune responsabilité
pour le contenu fourni.
> Subject: RE: Re : Moving to TestNG JUnit4?
> Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 21:25:35 +0200
> From: daniel.siegm...@fja-us.com
> To: dev@maven.apache.org
>
> No, there's no need to "fork" for different unit tes
nit tests using new features
(@Test annotation and such).
~Daniel
-Original Message-
From: Martin Gainty [mailto:mgai...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2010 10:11 AM
To: dev@maven.apache.org
Subject: RE: Re : Moving to TestNG JUnit4?
Dan and crew
i have seen junit configured a
ligatoire. Étant donné que les email peuvent facilement
être sujets à la manipulation, nous ne pouvons accepter aucune responsabilité
pour le contenu fourni.
> Subject: RE: Re : Moving to TestNG JUnit4?
> Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 15:52:24 +0200
> From: daniel.siegm...@fja-us.com
> To
I have similar experience. I upgraded a couple of projects to JUnit 4.8.1 (from
3.x) in the past few months. Leaving the old tests as-is has worked fine, while
allowing me to write new tests in the new style, just as you propose.
Seems like the best approach to me.
~Daniel Siegmann
-Origin
