t; -Original Message-
> From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 6. mars 2006 11:39
> To: scm-dev@maven.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Tests of 1.0
>
>
> Torbjørn Smørgrav wrote:
>>> Currently, the Bazaar provider tests fail for me under Windows (I have
>>
It runs fine for me on linux, cygwin and WinXP.
Can you give me the junit log?
Regards
Torbjørn
-Original Message-
From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 6. mars 2006 11:39
To: scm-dev@maven.apache.org
Subject: Re: Tests of 1.0
Torbjørn Smørgrav wrote:
>> Currentl
I updated the matrix : http://docs.codehaus.org/display/SCM/SCM+Matrix
Emmanuel
Torbjørn Smørgrav a écrit :
- since Bazaar, VSS, etc are "partially implemented", according to the
site, should they be omitted from this release? Or do they do enough to
be useful? Can we list what is implemented a
> - since Bazaar, VSS, etc are "partially implemented", according to the
> site, should they be omitted from this release? Or do they do enough to
> be useful? Can we list what is implemented and what is not?
We should at least define when a provider is implemented and not only
partially implement
Torbjørn Smørgrav wrote:
>> Currently, the Bazaar provider tests fail for me under Windows (I have
>> Bazaar installed in Cygwin).
>
> What version of bazaar do you use?
> (Version 0.7 is the current stable, pre 0.7 is failing on *nix like systems)
$ bzr --version
bzr (bazaar-ng) 0.7
Copyright 20
> Currently, the Bazaar provider tests fail for me under Windows (I have
> Bazaar installed in Cygwin).
What version of bazaar do you use?
(Version 0.7 is the current stable, pre 0.7 is failing on *nix like systems)
> I'd actually like to have the tests not require svn, cvs, bzr installed
> to pa
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 04, 2006 10:49 PM
To: scm-dev@maven.apache.org
Subject: Re: Tests of 1.0
- there's some javadoc missing. Can this be added to the public facing
classes? (eg, ScmFile, ScmResult, and the manager, provider and
repository interfaces)
