RE: site nav

2005-10-31 Thread Arnaud HERITIER
> > On Sun, 2005-10-30 at 23:57 +0100, Arnaud HERITIER wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, 2005-10-27 at 18:33 -0700, Brett Porter wrote: > > > > Hey, great job on the new sites for subprojects and the new > > > continuum > > > > logo everyone! > > > > > > > > I just noticed that the links on the m1 site

RE: site nav

2005-10-31 Thread Arnaud HERITIER
> > > > I didn't find articles in m2 site ? Is it already published ? > > http://maven.apache.org/articles.html > > But they weren't linked in. I'll link them into the > documentation page for now and deploy the site again. Ok, it's why I didn't find it. I didn't take a look at the docs in SVN

RE: site nav

2005-10-30 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Sun, 2005-10-30 at 23:57 +0100, Arnaud HERITIER wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2005-10-27 at 18:33 -0700, Brett Porter wrote: > > > Hey, great job on the new sites for subprojects and the new > > continuum > > > logo everyone! > > > > > > I just noticed that the links on the m1 site don't match > >

RE: site nav

2005-10-30 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Sun, 2005-10-30 at 23:53 +0100, Arnaud HERITIER wrote: > Ok. > Breadcrumbs aren't supported in m2 ? > I find this very useful to navigate in the site ? > Is it planned to support them ? They aren't currently there, but I agree that they are useful. http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-991 >

RE: site nav

2005-10-30 Thread Arnaud HERITIER
> > On Thu, 2005-10-27 at 18:33 -0700, Brett Porter wrote: > > Hey, great job on the new sites for subprojects and the new > continuum > > logo everyone! > > > > I just noticed that the links on the m1 site don't match > the others - > > can we sort that out. > > I think Arnaud and I can sor

RE: site nav

2005-10-30 Thread Arnaud HERITIER
> > On Fri, 2005-10-28 at 07:39 +0200, Arnaud HERITIER wrote: > > +1 for me. > > > > I think I don't have the needed rights to begin to move > some docs from > > m1 to m2 but if you need my help for something else .. Let me know. > > I think having access to move the doco around would be fine.

Re: site nav

2005-10-28 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Thu, 2005-10-27 at 18:33 -0700, Brett Porter wrote: > Hey, great job on the new sites for subprojects and the new continuum > logo everyone! > > I just noticed that the links on the m1 site don't match the others - > can we sort that out. I think Arnaud and I can sort that out. I will let so

RE: site nav

2005-10-28 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Fri, 2005-10-28 at 07:39 +0200, Arnaud HERITIER wrote: > +1 for me. > > I think I don't have the needed rights to begin to move some docs from m1 to > m2 but if you need my help for something else .. Let me > know. I think having access to move the doco around would be fine. How about we give

RE: site nav

2005-10-27 Thread Arnaud HERITIER
+1 for me. I think I don't have the needed rights to begin to move some docs from m1 to m2 but if you need my help for something else .. Let me know. For the links in m1 I can use the same as in m2 but : - I would like to keep the access to the pdf documentation (where can we place it?) - I oft

RE: site nav, style as artifacts? new POM elements?

2004-11-13 Thread Carlos Sanchez
Hi, IMHO there should be a composition of projects. This way I could create a project that actually is a composition of one or more projects or composition of projects, and calling e.g. site in that one would call site in each of the projects and integrate the results. I don't know if this is al